What about the POD? Is this satisfactory?
Umm, Sorry lack of Knowledge can make an total judgement.. but still Juarez and his ego is a problem(that was one in OTL), but think can work.
In general will be interesting how all will change
What about the POD? Is this satisfactory?
How does Maximillian be independent when what put him on the throne were French bayonets on French rifles, backed by a phony "poll of the people" that makes Florida 2000 look fair and just? Was he a "bad" man? No. But he has no independence from France. What could he do? And then there's the fact that Spain unloaded her Caste system of all of South/Central America... That I hate the Spanish for. And he was a Hapsburg! I LOATH those people!
With the help of Chihuahua's governor Luis Terrazas, liberal national leader Benito Juárez (1806–1872) resisted the French occupation in Chihuahua in the mid-1860s.
Maximillian could never equal President Benito Juarez.
President Benito Juarez once answered a letter sent by Maximillian.
He told Maximillian that because of his principales and that because he had sworn to uphold the integrity of Mexico, its sovereignty and independence, that he had to work with much activity, multiply his efforts, to finally carryout the sacred trust that the nation, exercising its faculties of sovereignty, had confided on him.
It is a miracle his government survived. He was once forced to flee to Panama then from there to Cuba and on to New Orleans where he was well received. But when he went back to Mexico, Veracruz, he never went back outside Mexico. Twice he was advised to cross into the US since the French troops were behind him but he said he would not leave. Story goes that while in present day Juarez City, then called Paso del Norte, he pointed to some Sierra in the distance and asked if that still was free Mexican territory. His military leaders said yes but that there was nothing there. That did not stop him from setting up his government there.
His political skills and public skills out did Maximillian.
French never totally controlled Chihuahua State where Juarez City is located even thought they did control for a short while Juarez City which went by the name of Paso del Norte. French also managed to take Chihuahua City twice after fierce fighting but always pulled out after a while. Someone once commented that he who controls Chihuahua State controls Mexico.
The letter http://www.lospobresdelatierra.org/textos/juarezcartamaximiliano.html
School kids sing about Juarez
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4bT2aM5yLHY&feature=related
Found a map of French intervention in 1862
http://www.lib.utexas.edu/maps/atlas_mexico/french_intervention_1862.jpg
Can anyone find any evidence to the contrary? Metro brings up good points here but I cannot think of a single other potential leader to replace Juarez but serve as his analog while still accepting the Hapsburgs.
Perhaps Diaz? Any feedback is appreciated.
Thank you, Metro.
I just read that Diaz ended up being anther dictator, so he might be a poor choice. There are two other generals that served under Juarez http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignacio_Zaragoza and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mariano_Escobedo.
Maybe Zaragoza as the commander-in-chief of the army of the Mexican empire and Escobedo as PM/Preisdent?
Taking those two away from Juarez would seriously destroy his support and make it easier to crush his rebellion.
Zargoza was too dedicated to the cause but I'm not sure about Escobedo. Diaz was a dictator because he had to have absolute power to organize the corrupt fledgling government but became power hungry and arrogant once it was organized. With the stability of Maximilian's new pro-Mexican government, Diaz may have become a very good (if a little greedy) first president.
Any attempt to undermine Juarez should be taken if he is adamant in standing against Max, in the form of bringing Escobedo over to the Imperial camp might even the odds or even tip the scales in his favor if Diaz comes over as well.
I now see that Diaz, albeit ruling with an iron fist, brought much needed industrialization to Mexico, so under Max he might be a good PM/President like you said.
I definitely don't see the French and Americans working together. The ACW is however an important event happening just across the border.
I do see a bloodier Civil War with a severely weakened Union in the aftermath (regardless if the south wins or not) helping Max's case as no support for Juarez. So going with Fremont winning the election might be your best bet for a PoD.
ASB: Max allies the CSA (Austria and France recognize its independence) and they crush the Union, Mexico gets California back
The last suggestion is ASB... but... it's... so... AWESOME.
I think I'm just going to kill Juarez off and butterfly some pro Hapsburg sentiment due to propaganda. Sound good?
You should totally do it anyways
Looks like you've got what you need to start, I can't wait for the TL to start.