I'm not sure, there's some lands that were well north of the Arctic Circle (or below the Antarctic one) that were practically subtropical in the Cretaceous.
Really? Huh! You learn more about the nature of prehistoric climate every day, I guess. (jokes aside, looks like I'll have to read up some more about how polar climate works!) Thanks for the protip all the same, beedok.
Your thoughts on glacial dynamics seem solid! That comment about rivers (aside from the impacts it will have on a region liable to be the heartland of the tropics) does point towards a general theme here, this is going to be a very wet world, at least in comparison to ours. Might be an idea to mark down the main mountain regions and the currents, to have an idea where those few deserts that will pop up will be. (I feel as if any dry areas in newly-southern-asia will still be pretty well watered. Maybe a great eurasian steppe analagous to OTL's?)Thanks for the kudos, lowtuff!
My theory was that Tibet would retain an ice-cap, but the Himalayas would still peek/peak out above it. The plateau itself would be a few hundred meters higher than on Earth thanks to the ice, an Antarctic landscape. Most of the rain would be coming up from the south during the summer, and a lot of it would fall on the ice-cap after having been elevated. The Great Siberian Rivers would flood dramatically.
Just as an aside, I have started to prefer retaining OTL geographical names as much as possible, except when they're explicit directions. North America becomes West America, West Africa becomes South Africa, the East Indies are the North Indies; Australia remains Australia, not Borealia (it does mean southern, but it's already translated); The Arctic Sea remains the Arctic Sea, not the Tropical Sea, Antarctica remains Antarctica, not Tropica (Arctic comes from arctos, for bear, it has cold weather connotations, but a tropical sea could easily be named after bears). And just to complete the examples; China is still China (there was no Qing here), and America is still America (there was no Amerigo Vespucci here).
Totally on board with what you're saying about placenames. What with the world _literally_ turned on its head and all the geographic and climate-wise changes, some familiarity is needed to keep your grasp on things steady.
Lots of islands that'd probably remain above the waves were too small to be marked on the basemap this is derived from, and I've been trying to add some via eyeballing the map, but this only goes so far. Just an FYI in advance if anyone tries using a tilted map only to find a lack of, say, the azores.
Current wip is here: Only have South America, Antarctica (most liable to be redone later, but at least will be a starting point) to go, thankfully. This is being traced by hand and climate, projection caused distortion and various slights of hand tend to mess things up. If anyone thinks anything looks off here, please point it out!
_________________________________________________
In addition to that, 1925 in the hemicycle-verse's North America.
Last edited: