"Human Cooking" makes me think of "To Serve Man"(Damon Knight?)
and Soylent Green
and Soylent Green
Technically Zonal ones I'm sure, but given that most Zones aren't fully liberated in practice yesDo the Sicietists have regionally specific commands?
There's this dark hunch of mine that this whole Diversitarian system is also made to distract from the deteriorating material conditions of this world, even in a way that is not too different from the OTL culture wars. Perhaps, it may even explain the curious lack of materialist focus even back into TTL's 19th century, at least as far as ITTL's Watson is concerned. It's only that - instead of the entire thing being done around the interests of megacorporations and the globalised market - it's done for the maintenance of the increasingly sclerotic Diversitarian world order.It's so weird how people seem to have become way worse at discerning that other countries and cultures can have different perspectives, like how so many of these audiences get angry when a speaker refers to a historical figure from another country as a "hero" or otherwise hints that their own narrative isn't always right. Maybe it's exaggerated for dramatic effect about the influence of Diversitarianism, but it doesn't speak well of how much casual xenophobia is normalized. I'm surprised that a world where "heritage points of controversy" are an institutional form of mudslinging and violence doesn't have conflicts left, right, and center. Then again, with how performative it sometimes is, the people in charge who participate in international institutions (though they'd never call them that) must be able to recognize that the world can't function peacefully without cooperation. If the way to do that is by paying lip service to these feuds and encouraging a safe level of passive violence and intolerance, they're clearly willing to do so. It stands to reason that other groups, like the Mentians whose far-left wing presumably shares socialists' belief in internationalism, would also use that strategy of pretending to stand alone if it means they can have unity by a different name.
That would make sense, we've already seen that Diversitarianism's stated goal is a the erosion of a common perception of shared experience, it would make sense that that enforced social alienation combined with an overwhelmingly antimaterialist stance of omnipresent narrative TTL and scaremongering about Societism would all be potent tools to not only prevent the rise of Mentian international solidarity but also inculcate the idea that they never had any possible chance of succeeding in the first place.There's this dark hunch of mine that this whole Diversitarian system is also made to distract from the deteriorating material conditions of this world, even in a way that is not too different from the OTL culture wars. Perhaps, it may even explain the curious lack of materialist focus even back into TTL's 19th century, at least as far as ITTL's Watson is concerned. It's only that - instead of the entire thing being done around the interests of megacorporations and the globalised market - it's done for the maintenance of the increasingly sclerotic Diversitarian world order.
Basically - leftists and liberals found themselves generally hard-pressed to realise, proselytise, and organise their respective emphases on class consciousness and republican democracy initially due to the strong conservative - mainly monarchist - bent of ITTL's 19th century, and only more so when much of those monarchies have started to get their own properly-democratic parliaments. After which, the Pandoric war happened and gave rise to the Combine and evenworsemore intensified Diversitarian nuttery.
Who knows? Such movements may even actually be quite active during those times, only to be suppressed not only by the more intense policing, but also by spinning and edition not only by their contemporaries, but also by modern-day historians intent to destroy written objectivity.
Switzerland I guess? Did they do anything horrible TTL?Are there examples of The Good Republic ITTL that republicans can point to?
Corsica and the UPSA before the corporations took control.Are there examples of The Good Republic ITTL that republicans can point to?
I don't think anyone ITTL would see many positive qualities in the UPSA with hindsight.Corsica and the UPSA before the corporations took control.
So nominally who decides which Rejes rotate where?behind the Zonal Rejes supposedly in charge
False; Meridian corporatocracy is certainly the greatest thing that happened since sliced bread!I don't think anyone ITTL would see many positive qualities in the UPSA with hindsight.
People IOTL see positives in the Russian Empire, who were a heck of a lot worse.I don't think anyone ITTL would see many positive qualities in the UPSA with hindsight.
Anyways, I've been going through rereading the Societism updates (as they're far and away my favorite aspect of the TL) and I came up with DBSR** where Mentianism is more successful but Societism forms a third ideological pole!That would make sense, we've already seen that Diversitarianism's stated goal is a the erosion of a common perception of shared experience, it would make sense that that enforced social alienation combined with an overwhelmingly antimaterialist stance of omnipresent narrative TTL and scaremongering about Societism would all be potent tools to not only prevent the rise of Mentian international solidarity but also inculcate the idea that they never had any possible chance of succeeding in the first place.
Probably not, though if I decide to make a post for it over in the flag thread I might flesh it out a bit more 🤔 I mainly created it as a discussion piece about Mentianism and the material effects of Distributism in the broader timeline proper.@Born in the USSA Do you want to write more about the GBHE in another thread?
Good point, but not much as defense of absolute monarchy as such, I suppose.People IOTL see positives in the Russian Empire, who were a heck of a lot worse.
I find it funny that Societism's more Asian centre have made for ITTL's version of the Asian Co-Prosperity Sphere. Perhaps, it will make for a more chauvinistic culture than the one that we have seen in the Combine in the canon timeline as the entire thing becomes a Crypto-nationalist project centred around the concept of the ancient Middle Kingdom.SNIP
Societism with Chinese CharacteristicsIt makes more sense for China to be the core of a *Pan-Asian (or in this case pan-Humanist with Asian overtones) movement than Japan.
Wasn't Japan so utterly subjugated by Russians, and then became so enmeshed with the Societist ideology that they and their culture became the stuff of jokes ITTL? While it may not be the case with this scenario, the entire canon have made for one hell of an unreliable account in regards to that country.It makes more sense for China to be the core of a *Pan-Asian (or in this case pan-Humanist with Asian overtones) movement than Japan.