What if the development of the nuclear bomb is delayed by around one year? How would the Pacific theater play out? Would Japan still be fighting in August 1946?
What if the development of the nuclear bomb is delayed by around one year? How would the Pacific theater play out? Would Japan still be fighting in August 1946?
https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:794584/FULLTEXT01.pdf
Just posting some excerpts from this
TL: DR:
>be shitter Japanese units
>filled with chinese and manchu conscripts
> barely any equipment
>face off against battle hardened Red Army divisions
>absolutely bitchslap them and force them to retreat
>only surrender because High Command are cowards who can't find a way out conditionally and the Emperor tells you to stop
Why could the Soviets pull off an invasion of Hokkaido before the Americans could do one of Kyushu?One big factor was fear of Soviet invasion to Hokkaido.
Why could the Soviets pull off an invasion of Hokkaido before the Americans could do one of Kyushu?
Because the Soviets don't care about sacrificing all their forces on the first couple tries?
Pretty much, and also because Hokkaido was very lightly defended. The Hokkaido cupboard was practically stripped bare to stock up Kyushu.Why could the Soviets pull off an invasion of Hokkaido before the Americans could do one of Kyushu?
Because the Soviets don't care about sacrificing all their forces on the first couple tries?
With Japan surrendering without a bomb, how would this affect how the world sees it's development? It would probably still be made and tested, but without the large scale deaths would it be seem as such a threat?