Gracias.
Have the Gunnagal ever met a back they wouldn't stab?
Gunnagals are the type of people to stab their mother in the womb to get an early way out.
Well put. That said, as with anything involving the Gunnagal, the situation is rather complex.
It is quite true that in a
metaphorical sense, Gunnagal would quite happily backstab anyone if they thought it gave them a bigger advantage. Where it gets more complex, though, is that Gunnagal operate within a set of unwritten, but nevertheless quite real rules. Gunnagal do not assassinate each other, at least not if they think there's any risk of getting caught. Or even if they think there's a significant risk of getting
blamed, even if no-one can prove it.
The reasons for this are far more pragmatic than they are ethical. Gunnagal have been playing the Endless Dance for centuries. If they start encouraging assassinations, well, anyone can be assassinated. There's no enjoyment or even lasting gains in the Endless Dance if it ends with the death of too many of the participants. So the unwritten rule evolved into
"Thou shalt not kill thy foe by assassination." People who are suspected of breaking that rule tend to find that it brings everyone against them, and that can be very, very bad. (As an aside, there are occasionally open squabbles between factions, although these are exceedingly rare nowadays. But an open squabble is seen as better than a knife in the dark, simply because it isn't going to risk starting the same trend of
everyone getting stabbed in the dark).
More broadly, within their own system the Gunnagal have evolved their own code which is in some ways the opposite of Machiavellian (despite some surface similarities). Machiavelli said to never to give a person a small injury. The Gunnagal system is the opposite: try not to do an enemy a large injury unless absolutely necessary. Their social system
expects that some people will change sides regularly. It's just part of the game. Any switch will involve some negative consequences on your former allies - but that doesn't mean that you will never want to deal with them again. So you try to make it so that your betrayal of them is not so bad that they will refuse to deal with you or try to take vengeance for the sake of it.
When it comes to dealing with non-Gunnagal, the rules were less strict, but nevertheless still relevant. Despite centuries of warfare with the Yadji, Gutjanal and Yigutji, no Gunnagal has ever sponsored the assassination of any of their reigning monarchs. Or for several centuries, any of their high-ranking officials. (There was an occasion about 300 years ago where that rule was broken for a high-ranking Yigutji official, leading to Unfortunate Consequences.) And despite the legendary reputation of the Gunnagal for switching sides, it was extremely rare for them to break an existing alliance with a reigning monarch of the other Five Rivers states (though not entirely unknown, if they saw a really big advantage or had good grounds for expecting to be betrayed themselves). The more common practice was to declare an alliance
with an existing monarch and stick to it as long as that monarch lived. Their alliance was thus with the monarch rather than the state. When the monarch died, of course, all alliances were up for reconsideration.
Things have changed with the Hunter because he was a circuit-breaker in more ways than one. He wasn't just a circuit-breaker for the eastern parts of Aururia, he was also a circuit-breaker in how the Gunnagal saw the world. They perceived him as outside the existing rules, and also introduced a sense of extreme fear that they could lose everything, simply because the Hunter would break the Dance, not join the Dance. So the Gunnagal, or rather some of them, were willing to take an extreme and open step, risking the furore that it would cause amongst the Dominion forces, simply because they believed that they had no real alternative.
The murder of Puckapunyal came in the environment where they continue to be afraid and still haven't settled down. Though Gurragang would never say it explicitly - he is a Gunnagal, after all - there was a strong fear that the world was still unsettled and that things could go seriously wrong. Yigutji was in chaos with the Dominion withdrawing, and it could turn into anything - Gutjanal might use him, or he might become a pawn in the struggles between competing Warego, or worse an excuse for the English or other Europeans to exert influence if they came in via former Port Percy (*Sydney). In that environment, there was too much concern that things could blow up and that Puckapunyal could become a tool of someone. So Gurragang decided that the only safe option was to remove the threat.
Or, for a much shorter version: Gunnagal betray each other (and other non-Gunnagal) quite happily. But the open results leading to death (the Hunter and Puckapunyal) were
not the norm, but the result of a sense of extreme desperation where they would not normally go so far.
Whether the Gunnagal settle down again from this situation remains to be seen, of course.
I want this to be an actual canon saying in the world of LoRaG.
... It is now.
I used an MSPaint map to help me keep track of what was going on this update, thought I'd post here lmao. The big red blob in the North is Kyulibah's and then Justice's Dominion, which despite the warfare is still far and away the largest state in Aururia. The black areas within were formerly Yongalla's and Goonawa's zones of influence. The Kiyungu and Daluming largely staying within the framework and supporting alternate Warego rather than overturning the system entirely reminds me of the Persians supporting the Abbasids as a within-Islam alternative to the Umayyads.
Nice map.
In terms of the way the Kiyungu and Daluming stayed with the Warego, the main comparison I had in mind was how revolts were relatively rare with the Diadochi after Alexander's death, but the Persians staying with the Abbasids is also a good analogy.
The smaller red blob just south is the former Kuyal Province, now with a Patjimunra king. Is their new king of the same dynasty as the old one? I imagine he'd have to be, in order to meet the society's casteist standards. Likely this new kingdom will be recontacted by the East India Company. Though with this new kingdom seemingly being stronger and the EIC more desperate to seal a deal, the New Murrginhi relationship with the EIC may be on a more equal footing than the relationship with the Old Murrginhi or Port Percy.
Yes, the new king is of the same royal family. The Murrginhi royal family mostly survived unmolested because the Hunter's way was not to wipe out existing non-ruling nobility unless they actually intrigued against him. In terms of Murrginhi's relationship with Europeans (and Tjibarr, and the Nuttana, and the surviving Dominion), it's worth pointing out that pre-Hunter Murrginhi was not really influenced by any of its neighbours. Their attitude of "we just don't make lasting deals with anyone", plus some luck beating off a couple of proxy invasions, meant that they'd survived largely intact. With their rule of "we don't deal with outsiders" now broken, it's an open question who they're going to end up cutting a deal with. They need some form of backing from outside to keep them safe from the Dominion, but does that best come from the English, the Dutch, the Nuttana or Tjibarr?
The green line through Yigutji is the partition line along the Matjidi, and the green dotted area northeast of it is Tjibarr's projected zone of influence. That area encompasses the Spice Road. The Dominion used it to invade, and now Tjibarr is likely to use it to supply aid to New Murrginhi. You know, it would be pretty cool for the former Yigutji notables to begin assembling some color-factions of their own, and jump into the Dance on their own terms. Though I suspect more than a few will just join the existing factions and be assimilated that way.
The Tjibarri will be doing their utmost to integrate Yigutji into the existing colour factions. The reason for this is that they really, really won't want a sense of separatism to develop, and having a faction located only in part of former Yigutji is just begging for that to happen. A possibility, though, could be that part of an existing faction in old Tjibarr break away to form a new faction which integrates some former Yigutjians into that faction.
Somewhat unrelated, but something makes me think the Yadji aren't going to invade the Tjunini after all. The moment in which they could have done it, in which the Dominion was bearing down on the Five Rivers and taking Dutch and English posts along the way, is past.
Without going into a yes or no answer for that yet (naturally), the Yadji are going to be part of another upcoming sequence of posts. That will look at the consequences of the situation in the Yadji realm (the religious discontent, the
attempt to plan for external conquest, and a few other matters) and cover both them and some of their neighbours. I will probably include here the Tiyanjara post which I've half-finished which gives a general look at how Tiyanjara has developed since declaring effective independence.
I'm guessing that if Warhammer came out in this timeline, the Skaven would have at least some Gunnagal influence.
Scribbles notes furiously for a new holiday special post...
Excellent. So it seems the Dominion is going to mostly hold together. And there may yet be a Timur to the Hunter's Genghis, so to speak.
Yes, at least for the medium term the Dominion has reduced but stable borders (in the former agricultural regions), and will probably go on a land grab in the less agricultural regions (as will several other states, come to that). Whether there will be a Timur-equivalent is still an open question, of course, but I'd also note that firearms technology is moving on. In OTL the steppe nomad empires started running into problems once agricultural societies started getting their hands on mass gunpowder. Firearms are spreading rapidly in Aururia in both numbers and quality. This makes it harder for the kind of "cavalry uber alles" conquests to happen. That doesn't rule out a kind of Timur-analogue, of course, but it would be more of a "military genius with combined arms" than cavalry being their greatest advantage.
Seven parts when the author is writing, or at the time which is the main subject of the book, which might be at any time in the past after the Hunter's death? You play with us at times, Jared.
That part wasn't meant to be obtuse. It's an ATL reference to a classic ATL poem which divides the (urbanised) parts of pre-contact Aururia into seven states, and was quoted in post #97:
“
Seven pearls strung along a necklace of gold
Shining afar in the red land e’er-old
Jewels unknown beyond the girting seas
‘Til pale men sailed in on fallen trees
Name all the pearls, you who have ears to hear
Spinners of words, who argue but ne’er fear [Tjibarr/Gunnagal]
Hoarders of severed heads and brilliant glass [Bungudjimay/Daluming]
Weavers of gold, obsessed with doom and class [Yadji/Durigal]
People of the skin, those who look within [Patjimunra]
Stalwarts true, care for aught but kith and kin [Yigutji]
Mavens fickle, who dwell ‘midst fire and flood [Gutjanal]
Lords of the beard, bringers of knives and blood. [Atjuntja]
Ruined by plague and war, the necklace burst
Pearls cast asunder, the lords shattered first...”
From Tjanja Concord Pindeera’s epic poem
Euchambie, published 1927
As an aside, what I thought was more of a tease was that in response to earlier questions in this thread, I said that by the end of the Hunter sequence it would be possible for readers to make a very informed guess about what's going on with Clements and his story. We've reached the end of the Hunter sequence, and that point still stands.
Very well written, and a satisfying conclusion to this arc. The principal question, of course, is if this is the end to regular LoRaG updates? I really enjoyed the frequency of them, proper serialisation improves the consumption of any form of media, IMO. I definitely would support this becoming the norm, fully-formed arcs released in regular, short intervals.
That post is the end of the Hunter sequence, because I thought that was a good way to end that self-contained story arc. So there won't be further chapters coming until I've written a new sequence. I do plan to start releasing chapters in batches (except perhaps for occasional holiday special posts), though most of these sequences will probably be shorter than the Hunter sequence.
My general plan for the next couple of sequences is as follows:
- First sequence is a series of matched travelogues written by an English visitor to Aururia, mostly but not entirely set in Tjibarr, matched with one written by a Tjibarri visitor to Europe
- Second sequence (as referenced above) is set in Durigal, *Tasmania, and neighbouring parts of southern Aururia
After that, I plan to move on to the buildup and then depiction of the Nine Years' War (Aururian front), but I haven't yet decided whether that will be one or several sequences.
As another aside, the Hunter sequence (from posts #113-#123) was mostly written a couple of years ago, but I added two chapters that were written while publishing the rest, based on reader comments that happened in between. Can anyone guess which those two chapters are?
As to the content, one thing I hoped we would see more of, and still can now that the Dominion is largely secure, is the Dominion forcing Europeans to conduct trade on more equal terms. All the major Aururian states have this interest in common, perhaps we will see some cooperation there. We're roughly in the mid 18th century now, right? Transport times should be reducing now, and with the added impetus will we see something like an early Clipper ship which would allow rapid communication between Europe and Aururia? That'd certainly up the stakes. I'm also expecting that we're about to see a rapid filling-in of the Aururian map, as plague-recovered major states now have the technology to splash their colour into remote areas...
A series of land claims from Tjibarr and the Dominion (and possibly others) is likely to follow over the next few decades, barring the effects of any further European disruption.
The question about conducting trade on equal terms is an interesting one, because that links to the broader question of where to from here for the European trading companies. We're not yet done with seeing their reactions to the rise of the Dominion, but since that plays out over a couple of decades I left that out of the wrapping-up post for the Hunter sequence. It will be covered in separate sequences.
In terms of sailing technology, the Nuttana are already using the clipper route, though not clipper ships as such, so they can already travel pretty quickly between Europe and Aururia. The Europeans will no doubt catch up to this soon enough. What I'm trying to figure out more of now is what European-made goods will actually be highly-desired in Aururia, since that affects which way the trade routes flow.
My guess the Yadji not invading the Tjuini is probably due to not wanting to cause even more conflict if the Dominion did actually get past all those Kingdoms between them and the Yadji. Now I’m curious to see how Malligo’s harmony batallions manage to intervene themselves in Aotorean politics.
What happens with the Yadji will be covered in a new sequence of posts (as per above). I can say that while the Harmony Battalion will end up in Aururia, that's not for a few decades yet. Malligo is unlikely to be alive by the time that happens. (Whether he dies of natural causes or has an assisted death will be covered eventually.)
Can we get an estimate of the population of the Maoris just in Aotorea (New Zealand) alone? I’m going to guess after all the diseases subside, it’ll be near one million.
Has there been a massive population boom from Aurarian foods? I can't recall if that's been covered.
I remember reading one of the earliest chapters, and I think Aururian traders brought Red Yam and other products to Aotorea during TTL earlier version of the Musket Wars. This led to a rise in population, as infighting slowly ceased between the Iwis(can’t remember the Maori word for tribe).
I was just thinking you'd need a very large increase over OTL to get a population of a million plus after the impact of disease. OTL population densities were fairly low, with most of New Zealand not that great for the Polynesian food package. I've seen numbers in the 100,000-200,000 range for the pre-Cook and co. era.
The Aururian food package was introduced early to Aotearoa (1310s-1330s) and turned out to be
much more well-suited to their climate than the OTL Polynesian food package, since the latter barely grew in NZ in most cases. Aotearoa experienced a very large population boom as a result, which indeed was still growing at the point of European contact since they were continuing to produce food surpluses.
As with most population figures, I have a range rather than an exact figure, but the pre-European disease population of Aotearoa was in the range of 3-4 million. Their population will bottom out somewhere in the 1-1.5 million range.
Speaking of the Maori, what is going on to the Nuttana backed Maori kingdoms following the disruption of Nuttana influence on the eastern Aururian coast on the part of the Dominion?
The Nuttana are still alive and still have all of their naval power, though their trade markets are getting disrupted. They will need to reorient themselves in various ways (which I'll get to covering at some point). In general they remain major players in Aotearoa, but the spice component of their trade has been significantly reduced since they are cut off from most of the Aururian east coast spice markets.