Deleted member 147978
My question is that could it be a royal Wessex name?Saint Botolphs was a parish of London so it was not that obscure
My question is that could it be a royal Wessex name?Saint Botolphs was a parish of London so it was not that obscure
Why Wessex rather than Plantagenet? I thought this was about any kingdom? I was looking at it as a saintly name to be grubbed up and used by the Kingdom of EnglandMy question is that could it be a royal Wessex name?
Henry IV had a son called Thomas, he was quite an important figure in his timeI never got why the Plantagenets and Tudors never called their kids Thomas. There was a smattering of Edwards but no Thomas's.
Since the name is an obscure Anglo-Saxon name, it's most likely going to be a potential Wessex name as opposed to a Romance Plantagenet name.Why Wessex rather than Plantagenet? I thought this was about any kingdom? I was looking at it as a saintly name to be grubbed up and used by the Kingdom of England
Oh... I didn't know those were the rulesSince the name is an obscure Anglo-Saxon name, it's most likely going to be a potential Wessex name as opposed to a Romance Plantagenet name.
Except it was the Plantagenets (Henry III) who returned the obscure Old English names of (St) Edward and (St) Edmund to royal use.Since the name is an obscure Anglo-Saxon name, it's most likely going to be a potential Wessex name as opposed to a Romance Plantagenet name.
I mean, why would a Plantagenet King name one of sons after a superbly obscure Anglo-Saxon parish? Edward and Edmund were prototypical names of their kind, not like Botwulf.Oh... I didn't know those were the rules
I thought we were looking at possibilities. And it's also already latinised as Botolph, regardless of what the origin of the name might be.I mean, why would a Plantagenet King name one of sons after a superbly obscure Anglo-Saxon parish? Edward and Edmund were prototypical names of their kind, not like Botwulf.
With all due respect, I'm not disregarding Botolph completely. It's just that I believe it'll be unlikely for Henry III to name one if his sons after the parish. (That's if he had knowledge of said person's name.)I thought we were looking at possibilities. And it's also already latinised as Botolph, regardless of what the origin of the name might be.
I just thought it seemed one of the more likely obscure saints names that could be raised from the dead for a royal prince, if raising obscure saints names from the dead for royal princes was the point of the exercise.
Henry IV had a son called Thomas, he was quite an important figure in his time
Thomas of Lancaster, Duke of Clarence - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
One of John of Gaunt's Beaufort sons was called Thomas and of course his own brother, son of Edward III was also Thomas
Thomas of Woodstock, Duke of Gloucester - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
England could easily have ended up with King Alphonso had Edward I's son, Alphonso, Earl of Chester not predeceased his father at age 10.Also a son of Edmund Crouchback; a short lived son of Richard Duke of York; and Thomas Earl of Norfolk (son of Edward I).
England could easily have ended up with King Alphonso had Edward I's son, Alphonso, Earl of Chester not predeceased his father at age 10.
Alphonse initially with silent e.I wonder how his name would have been Anglicized. Alfons would be my best guess - but i would be kinda cool to have a few King Alfons of England in the dynastic lists
I doubt if it will ever be used again among European royals...Andrew is a good one. First Apostle of Jesus, yet the name was pretty much only used by a few Medieval Hungarians.
Andrew is the patron saint of Scotland, suppose a Scottish King Andrew.I doubt if it will ever be used again among European royals...
Andrew, brother of Louis I of Hungary, would be King of Naples if he was not assassinated. From there name Andrew could spread across Italy and Western Mediterranean. Perfect Andrew-wankI doubt if it will ever be used again among European royals...
Another two saints' names that could be "common" if things had shaken out differently: Martha (if Juan I of Aragon had had a surviving son by his first wife or if his daughter, Juana, had had issue) and Martin (if Juan I's brother/nephew had left surviving issue)Andrew, brother of Louis I of Hungary, would be King of Naples if he was not assassinated. From there name Andrew could spread across Italy and Western Mediterranean. Perfect Andrew-wank
Andrew is also possible among Jagiellons (father of Jogaila's last wife was daughter of Andrey Halshanski, name could re-surface in next generations)