A question, will you address some of the more obscure countries that may have relations with Corsica?

For example, just as an anecdote, a Nepali diplomat was sent to Europe in 1785 and he apparently met with Charles Louis de Marbeuf. Nepali records of the man show him remarking that Corsica felt just like a European version of Sri Lanka - whatever that meant. He traded some Nepali goods, opened the idea of further talks, and then left Corsica, traveling to Valencia.

There may be other anecdotes from such countries as well. It would be cool to see them addressed in a way.
 
One thing I'd love to know is how is our slowly thriving Corsica viewed by Europe at large?

We've seen the English overtaken by Theodore fascination when he first arrived on the island, we've seen Amsterdam Merchants invest in the project, we've also seen them help Russia against the Ottomans, Danish ships arrive at port to resupply and give gifts from the kingdom, & even Theo II going to Turin for his studies.

It's got me curious what do other Europeans think of Corsica now that it's more settled on the world stage and is no longer an eccentric curiousity?

Which also begs another question, who do the Corsicans views as their "friends" for lack of a better word? Obviously Genoa is seen as an eternal enemy and the french are looked at with some ambivalence, but who would Corsicans and the state at large view positively?
 
One thing I'd love to know is how is our slowly thriving Corsica viewed by Europe at large?

We've seen the English overtaken by Theodore fascination when he first arrived on the island, we've seen Amsterdam Merchants invest in the project, we've also seen them help Russia against the Ottomans, Danish ships arrive at port to resupply and give gifts from the kingdom, & even Theo II going to Turin for his studies.

It's got me curious what do other Europeans think of Corsica now that it's more settled on the world stage and is no longer an eccentric curiousity?

Which also begs another question, who do the Corsicans views as their "friends" for lack of a better word? Obviously Genoa is seen as an eternal enemy and the french are looked at with some ambivalence, but who would Corsicans and the state at large view positively?
Genoa isn't the eternal enemy. At this point, through the force of France and a peace treaty, they must always have diplomats with each other. It's the kind of thing where even after Genoa has been absorbed in the Age of Nationalism, if Corsica isn't also I could see the Kingdom continuing to have a diplomatic figure with the city of Genoa and also vice versa as a goodwill type of thing.
 
Love this update, can't wait for the completion of the royal road and how it ties the country together. The more Corsica is able to reach its more remote parts the better the government will be able to both develop and extract wealth from its lands. Which makes me wonder, how are the d'Ornanos doing at this time? They used to be the almost untouchable dukes of South Corsica during Theodore I reign. By now they likely are at least somewhat more accountable to the government, even if the royal road has yet to be done and royal control of the country is still somewhat shaky in parts. Will Corsica designate/ create a port specifically for Jewish immigrants to come and live in? It could help mitigate the friction with native corsicans if the jews have their own settlement where they are free to practice their laws and customs. Ajaccio could stay the center of jewish political and economic life on corsica, but perhaps a small village neighboring it where jews are free to govern themselves would attract even more immigrants(and more invesmtents). Likewise, does the government have any plans for the island of Gorgona in the works?
 
Last edited:
Well, it seems Teodoro II won't be rememberred as the Bakrupt king but as the Unifier (both for taking Bonifacio and for the Via Nationali uniting Nort and South)
 
For example, just as an anecdote, a Nepali diplomat was sent to Europe in 1785 and he apparently met with Charles Louis de Marbeuf. Nepali records of the man show him remarking that Corsica felt just like a European version of Sri Lanka - whatever that meant. He traded some Nepali goods, opened the idea of further talks, and then left Corsica, traveling to Valencia.

I wasn't aware of that, and I didn't come across anything with a quick search - could you give me some sources on this? It's rather remarkable to me that a foreign dignitary visiting France would have visited Corsica in the 1780s!

It's got me curious what do other Europeans think of Corsica now that it's more settled on the world stage and is no longer an eccentric curiousity?

We're coming up on another "family update" talking about the Neuhoffs themselves which will touch on this - basically, while Corsica fits into the established European system pretty easily ("small Italian state" is not a new thing), there's a lot more resistance to seeing the kings of Corsica as royal peers. Spain, for instance, is perfectly willing to deal with Corsica on a political and diplomatic basis and accept the kingdom as a legitimate state, but nobody in Madrid would consider for a moment the idea of marrying a Bourbon to a Neuhoff. The best they can really do for the moment is prominent but non-sovereign nobility (like the Boncompagni-Ludovisi) and cadet/illegitimate branches of actual royal lines (like the Savoy-Carignano).

Which also begs another question, who do the Corsicans views as their "friends" for lack of a better word? Obviously Genoa is seen as an eternal enemy and the french are looked at with some ambivalence, but who would Corsicans and the state at large view positively?

Well, in part it depends in part on who you mean by "Corsicans:" a southern aristocrat, a Castagniccian farmer, and an urban shopkeeper may all have very different views.

That said, I think the general Corsican view of the French is not quite as good as "ambivalent." Certainly there is a lot of respect for France, but it's often grudging respect. Nobody can deny that they are a military, political, and cultural powerhouse. But they have also constantly meddled with Corsica and have actively fought to crush her national ambitions - from the Revolution, to the Monaco Debt and the decennio Francese, to the ultimatum of Ajaccio and the "barefoot revolt" in Bastia, to the French taking it upon themselves to end the Coral War. I'm reminded of the way that many Latin American countries see the USA - as a powerful, intrusive, domineering neighbor, impressive for its wealth and cultural power but also an ever-present threat lurking just over the horizon. There are some Corsicans who have more open admiration for France, particularly the landholding nobility (who wish they were as powerful and distinguished as French aristocrats) and some intellectuals who admire French literature and philosophy, but even these elites often harbor some resentment towards France for continually sticking its nose in Corsica's business.

Spain is viewed more favorably. Corsica has a long history with Spain, having been contested by the Kings of Aragon for centuries, and the Spanish legacy can still be seen in things like the title of "don" and perhaps even the Moor's Head flag (often thought to be an Aragonese symbol). The Corsicans view the Spanish as closer to them than the French both culturally and morally, as the Spanish are perceived as more pious, sober, and honorable than those godless libertines up in Paris. The Corsicans also see Spain, and Carlos III in particular, as a "good neighbor" - Spain has never tried to overtly dominate Corsica as France has, and Carlos has been regarded as a friend of Corsica ever since he turned a blind eye to Corsican smugglers and expatriates as King of Naples. (You may recall that the first person the Corsicans asked to be their king, even before Theodore was on the scene, was Carlos back when he was just Duke of Parma.) If you actually polled the Corsicans as to their favorability towards other countries at this point in time, Spain would probably come out on top.

Corsican views of other Italians are complicated. On the one hand, they are "brother nations" - the Corsicans absolutely think of themselves as Italian and see themselves as part of that cultural and intellectual world. But the Corsicans also tend to look down on other Italians; many are exposed to them only through the lucchese, Italian seasonal workers, who are treated with absolute contempt by the Corsican peasantry. There's definitely an inferiority complex at work here - the Corsicans know that they are seen in Italy as poor, rustic, and barbarous, and so they lionize themselves as more moral, more honorable, more courageous, and just plain manlier than those soft, pampered mainlanders who have forgotten what war means. The Genoese, of course, are the most decadent and cowardly of all Italians. The Piedmontese are probably the only Italians that the Corsicans really see as their equals, at least in terms of courage; they are really the only other Italian state whose "martial vigor" can't really be questioned. Indeed, they're even equal in rank, as Corsica and Sardinia are both kingdoms unlike all these other duchies and republics.

The English relationship is also complicated, but for other reasons. Britain is the old friend who sided with the revolutionaries in battle, but while Britain has been a powerful ally they also have a history of leaving the Corsicans twisting in the wind. Corsica is a fad to the English, something that goes in and out of fashion, and thus they can't really be relied upon. Perhaps it's because they're money-grubbing Machiavellians who do only what serves their interests, or perhaps it's because they're heretics and just don't have the same sense of honor and loyalty as "true Christians." The English are respected as rich and powerful, but they don't really have much cultural impact on Corsica. Most Corsicans probably view them in the same ambivalent manner as other Protestant "maritime powers" like the Dutch and the Danes - good people to trade with, but you wouldn't let one of them marry your daughter.

Which makes me wonder, how are the d'Ornanos doing at this time? They used to be the almost untouchable dukes of South Corsica during Theodore I reign.

Luca's son and successor is Marquis Francesco Maria d'Ornano, who we haven't really seen in the chapters. By this time in the story he's in his late 50s. He's still a very influential nobleman, but he doesn't quite have the political instincts that his father did, and the growth of Ajaccio and the imposition of the provincial chamber have limited the horizons of an old-fashioned rural clan network like his. Whereas Don Luca never cared much about receiving "national" office, content to be a feudal lord in the Dila, Don Francesco served as inspector-general of militia in Matra's government, is elected to the consulta generale pretty much every year, and is presently a colonel-in-chief of one of the provincial regiments (largely a do-nothing job). Don Francesco will probably welcome the completion of the National Road, because it will make it easier for him to be at court and nearer the center of power. Don Luca helped arrange his son's government post in the 1770s, which suggests he may have seen where the wind was blowing - Corsica was changing, and the family was going to have to establish a national presence to stay relevant.

Historically, Francesco d'Ornano (or "Francois-Marie d'Ornano") was a French general and fervent royalist who lost his head to Madame Guillotine, so he's probably better off ITTL.

Gorgona has basically been given to the "commune" of Capraia to do with as they please. There will probably be some minor settlement there, but the island's main interest is as a waystation for fishing, and the government has more important things to spend its development money on for the time being.
 
Last edited:
Aren't the Boncompagni-Ludovisi technically sovereign nobility of Piombino and Isola d'Elba?

Depending on who you ask, Piombino was either a vassal of Spain or Naples. The princes themselves insisted that they were Spanish vassals, but the Kings of Naples disputed this, and when Carlos of Naples became Carlos III of Spain he settled the matter permanently by renouncing Spanish suzerainty in favor of Naples. (They were also honorary imperial princes.) Certainly the Princes of Piombino were more autonomous than, say, some random Neapolitan count, but they were not considered formally sovereign.
 
Well, in part it depends in part on who you mean by "Corsicans:" a southern aristocrat, a Castagniccian farmer, and an urban shopkeeper may all have very different views.

That said, I think the general Corsican view of the French is not quite as good as "ambivalent." Certainly there is a lot of respect for France, but it's often grudging respect. Nobody can deny that they are a military, political, and cultural powerhouse. But they have also constantly meddled with Corsica and have actively fought to crush her national ambitions - from the Revolution, to the Monaco Debt and the decennio Francese, to the ultimatum of Ajaccio and the "barefoot revolt" in Bastia, to the French taking it upon themselves to end the Coral War. I'm reminded of the way that many Latin American countries see the USA - as a powerful, intrusive, domineering neighbor, impressive for its wealth and cultural power but also an ever-present threat lurking just over the horizon. There are some Corsicans who have more open admiration for France, particularly the landholding nobility (who wish they were as powerful and distinguished as French aristocrats) and some intellectuals who admire French literature and philosophy, but even these elites often harbor some resentment towards France for continually sticking its nose in Corsica's business.

Spain is viewed more favorably. Corsica has a long history with Spain, having been contested by the Kings of Aragon for centuries, and the Spanish legacy can still be seen in things like the title of "don" and perhaps even the Moor's Head flag (often thought to be an Aragonese symbol). The Corsicans view the Spanish as closer to them than the French both culturally and morally, as the Spanish are perceived as more pious, sober, and honorable than those godless libertines up in Paris. The Corsicans also see Spain, and Carlos III in particular, as a "good neighbor" - Spain has never tried to overtly dominate Corsica as France has, and Carlos has been regarded as a friend of Corsica ever since he turned a blind eye to Corsican smugglers and expatriates as King of Naples. (You may recall that the first person the Corsicans asked to be their king, even before Theodore was on the scene, was Carlos back when he was just Duke of Parma.) If you actually polled the Corsicans as to their favorability towards other countries at this point in time, Spain would probably come out on top.

Corsican views of other Italians are complicated. On the one hand, they are "brother nations" - the Corsicans absolutely think of themselves as Italian and see themselves as part of that cultural and intellectual world. But the Corsicans also tend to look down on other Italians; many are exposed to them only through the lucchese, Italian seasonal workers, who are treated with absolute contempt by the Corsican peasantry. There's definitely an inferiority complex at work here - the Corsicans know that they are seen in Italy as poor, rustic, and barbarous, and so they lionize themselves as more moral, more honorable, more courageous, and just plain manlier than those soft, pampered mainlanders who have forgotten what war means. The Genoese, of course, are the most decadent and cowardly of all Italians. The Piedmontese are probably the only Italians that the Corsicans really see as their equals, at least in terms of courage; they are really the only other Italian state whose "martial vigor" can't really be questioned. Indeed, they're even equal in rank, as Corsica and Sardinia are both kingdoms unlike all these other duchies and republics.

The English relationship is also complicated, but for other reasons. Britain is the old friend who sided with the revolutionaries in battle, but while Britain has been a powerful ally they also have a history of leaving the Corsicans twisting in the wind. Corsica is a fad to the English, something that goes in and out of fashion, and thus they can't really be relied upon. Perhaps it's because they're money-grubbing Machiavellians who do only what serves their interests, or perhaps it's because they're heretics and just don't have the same sense of honor and loyalty as "true Christians." The English are respected as rich and powerful, but they don't really have much cultural impact on Corsica. Most Corsicans probably view them in the same ambivalent manner as other Protestant "maritime powers" like the Dutch and the Danes - good people to trade with, but you wouldn't let one of them marry your daughter.
And to round off the list, where do the Austrians and Turks fit in?
 
And to round off the list, where do the Austrians and Turks fit in?

Corsica was historically a "frontier state" in the conflict zone between Christianity and Islam, and conflict against the Moors has been marked indelibly into the culture and the landscape. Their flag has a Moor's head, their popular dance is the moresca, a sword dance that pantomimes the wars between Muslims and crusaders, and the coast is dotted with towers built to watch the horizon for Moorish corsairs and slavers. Although some Corsican elites have more nuanced views, most Corsicans don't really draw much of a distinction between the "Moors" of the Barbary states and the "Turks" of the east; they are all manifestations of the same enemy which has, in one form or another, waged war upon Corsica for the last thousand years.

The Austrians did intervene in Corsica back in the 1730s, but that was a long time ago and they haven't really been influential on the island since. They are respected as a major Catholic power and a foe of the Turks, and the Corsicans know that the Neuhoffs are themselves a princely house of the Empire (or so Theodore told them), but otherwise I don't think the Corsicans have very strong feelings about the Germans/Austrians.
 
I wasn't aware of that, and I didn't come across anything with a quick search - could you give me some sources on this? It's rather remarkable to me that a foreign dignitary visiting France would have visited Corsica in the 1780s!



We're coming up on another "family update" talking about the Neuhoffs themselves which will touch on this - basically, while Corsica fits into the established European system pretty easily ("small Italian state" is not a new thing), there's a lot more resistance to seeing the kings of Corsica as royal peers. Spain, for instance, is perfectly willing to deal with Corsica on a political and diplomatic basis and accept the kingdom as a legitimate state, but nobody in Madrid would consider for a moment the idea of marrying a Bourbon to a Neuhoff. The best they can really do for the moment is prominent but non-sovereign nobility (like the Boncompagni-Ludovisi) and cadet/illegitimate branches of actual royal lines (like the Savoy-Carignano).



Well, in part it depends in part on who you mean by "Corsicans:" a southern aristocrat, a Castagniccian farmer, and an urban shopkeeper may all have very different views.

That said, I think the general Corsican view of the French is not quite as good as "ambivalent." Certainly there is a lot of respect for France, but it's often grudging respect. Nobody can deny that they are a military, political, and cultural powerhouse. But they have also constantly meddled with Corsica and have actively fought to crush her national ambitions - from the Revolution, to the Monaco Debt and the decennio Francese, to the ultimatum of Ajaccio and the "barefoot revolt" in Bastia, to the French taking it upon themselves to end the Coral War. I'm reminded of the way that many Latin American countries see the USA - as a powerful, intrusive, domineering neighbor, impressive for its wealth and cultural power but also an ever-present threat lurking just over the horizon. There are some Corsicans who have more open admiration for France, particularly the landholding nobility (who wish they were as powerful and distinguished as French aristocrats) and some intellectuals who admire French literature and philosophy, but even these elites often harbor some resentment towards France for continually sticking its nose in Corsica's business.

Spain is viewed more favorably. Corsica has a long history with Spain, having been contested by the Kings of Aragon for centuries, and the Spanish legacy can still be seen in things like the title of "don" and perhaps even the Moor's Head flag (often thought to be an Aragonese symbol). The Corsicans view the Spanish as closer to them than the French both culturally and morally, as the Spanish are perceived as more pious, sober, and honorable than those godless libertines up in Paris. The Corsicans also see Spain, and Carlos III in particular, as a "good neighbor" - Spain has never tried to overtly dominate Corsica as France has, and Carlos has been regarded as a friend of Corsica ever since he turned a blind eye to Corsican smugglers and expatriates as King of Naples. (You may recall that the first person the Corsicans asked to be their king, even before Theodore was on the scene, was Carlos back when he was just Duke of Parma.) If you actually polled the Corsicans as to their favorability towards other countries at this point in time, Spain would probably come out on top.

Corsican views of other Italians are complicated. On the one hand, they are "brother nations" - the Corsicans absolutely think of themselves as Italian and see themselves as part of that cultural and intellectual world. But the Corsicans also tend to look down on other Italians; many are exposed to them only through the lucchese, Italian seasonal workers, who are treated with absolute contempt by the Corsican peasantry. There's definitely an inferiority complex at work here - the Corsicans know that they are seen in Italy as poor, rustic, and barbarous, and so they lionize themselves as more moral, more honorable, more courageous, and just plain manlier than those soft, pampered mainlanders who have forgotten what war means. The Genoese, of course, are the most decadent and cowardly of all Italians. The Piedmontese are probably the only Italians that the Corsicans really see as their equals, at least in terms of courage; they are really the only other Italian state whose "martial vigor" can't really be questioned. Indeed, they're even equal in rank, as Corsica and Sardinia are both kingdoms unlike all these other duchies and republics.

The English relationship is also complicated, but for other reasons. Britain is the old friend who sided with the revolutionaries in battle, but while Britain has been a powerful ally they also have a history of leaving the Corsicans twisting in the wind. Corsica is a fad to the English, something that goes in and out of fashion, and thus they can't really be relied upon. Perhaps it's because they're money-grubbing Machiavellians who do only what serves their interests, or perhaps it's because they're heretics and just don't have the same sense of honor and loyalty as "true Christians." The English are respected as rich and powerful, but they don't really have much cultural impact on Corsica. Most Corsicans probably view them in the same ambivalent manner as other Protestant "maritime powers" like the Dutch and the Danes - good people to trade with, but you wouldn't let one of them marry your daughter.



Luca's son and successor is Marquis Francesco Maria d'Ornano, who we haven't really seen in the chapters. By this time in the story he's in his late 50s. He's still a very influential nobleman, but he doesn't quite have the political instincts that his father did, and the growth of Ajaccio and the imposition of the provincial chamber have limited the horizons of an old-fashioned rural clan network like his. Whereas Don Luca never cared much about receiving "national" office, content to be a feudal lord in the Dila, Don Francesco served as inspector-general of militia in Matra's government, is elected to the consulta generale pretty much every year, and is presently a colonel-in-chief of one of the provincial regiments (largely a do-nothing job). Don Francesco will probably welcome the completion of the National Road, because it will make it easier for him to be at court and nearer the center of power. Don Luca helped arrange his son's government post in the 1770s, which suggests he may have seen where the wind was blowing - Corsica was changing, and the family was going to have to establish a national presence to stay relevant.

Historically, Francesco d'Ornano (or "Francois-Marie d'Ornano") was a French general and fervent royalist who lost his head to Madame Guillotine, so he's probably better off ITTL.

Gorgona has basically been given to the "commune" of Capraia to do with as they please. There will probably be some minor settlement there, but the island's main interest is as a waystation for fishing, and the government has more important things to spend its development money on for the time being.
I don’t think the Corsican royal family Would be left out of the European royal marriage market for long. It’s the third generation already and the other royal families will probably get used to them pretty soon. The latest generation have a personal relationship with the Habsburgs for example. The Bonapartes even when exiled became accepteable marriage targets after Napoleon III’s generation. The Bernadottes got recognition from foreign royal families even faster. One thing to the Neuhoff’s credit is that they didn’t seize the throne from any existing royal family, they gained it from some godless Republican scum through the right of conquest, so it’s easier for them to be recognized. The French Revolution is also close at hand(and I don’t think it could be averted since France still went to war in America), so there will be plenty of downtrodden royal families that could be married for their pedigrees assuming the Corsicans can keep their island out of France’s touch with the help of the Royal navy. At worst, prestigious dynasties like the Bourbons and the Habsburgs will probably be willing to marry the daughters of the cadet lines like the Orleans to the Neuhoffs. One of the sovereign lines ruling a minor Italian state like the Bourbons of Naples should be within reach.
 
Last edited:
How are Naples, Venice, and the Papacy viewed by Corsica?

See my earlier comment on "other Italians" - a mix of "our brothers" and "decadent @#$%&s who think they're better than us." Undoubtedly there are specific stereotypes about specific countries, but I'm painting in broad strokes here.

The Papacy is a different matter altogether, assuming you mean the actual institution of the Church rather than "people who live in the Papal States." Naturally, the Corsicans love the person of the Pope, although that doesn't always equate to following Rome's wishes. At the moment the Corsican government is still at loggerheads with Rome, having downgraded their diplomatic relations after the Pope denied their request to have their own archbishop.

I don’t think the Corsican royal family Would be left out of the European royal marriage market for long. It’s the third generation already and the other royal families will probably get used to them pretty soon. The latest generation have a personal relationship with the Habsburgs for example. The Bonapartes even when exiled became accepteable marriage targets after Napoleon III’s generation. The Bernadottes got recognition from foreign royal families even faster. One thing to the Neuhoff’s credit is that they didn’t seize the throne from any existing royal family,so it’s easier for them to be recognized. The French Revolution is also close at hand(and I don’t think it could be averted since France still went to war in America), so there will be plenty of downtrodden royal families that could be married for their pedigrees assuming the Corsicans can keep their island out of France’s touch with the help of the Royal navy. At worst, prestigious dynasties like the Bourbons and the Habsburgs will probably be willing to marry the daughters of the cadet lines like the Orleans to the Neuhoffs.

While it's technically the "third generation," Theodore I has only been in the ground for about 13 years and Federico was born a baron. Theo is the first Corsican monarch who was actually "born into royalty." Otherwise, however, I agree with you - the Neuhoffs fit into the European system pretty well and have already been able to marry into some fairly distinguished blood. By the first decade of the 1800s when Theo starts thinking about marriages for his kids (we'll talk about them soon), a Bourbon or Habsburg match might be plausible. Cadet branches might be more reasonable, as you suggest, particularly the Italian secundogenitures like Naples, Parma, and Tuscany (assuming they survive whatever upheaval the alt-French Revolution has in store for them). I had specifically considered a Corsican-Tuscan match given that King Theodore II and Grand Duke Karl are personal friends and of reasonably similar ages.
 
Last edited:
See my earlier comment on "other Italians" - a mix of "our brothers" and "decadent @#$%&s who think they're better than us." Undoubtedly there are specific stereotypes about specific countries, but I'm painting in broad strokes here.

The Papacy is a different matter altogether, assuming you mean the actual institution of the Church rather than "people who live in the Papal States." Naturally, the Corsicans love the person of the Pope, although that doesn't always equate to following Rome's wishes. At the moment the Corsican government is still at loggerheads with Rome, having downgraded their diplomatic relations after the Pope denied their request to have their own archbishop.



While it's technically the "third generation," Theodore I has only been in the ground for about 13 years and Federico was born a baron. Theo is the first Corsican monarch who was actually "born into royalty." Otherwise, however, I agree with you - the Neuhoffs fit into the European system pretty well and have already been able to marry into some fairly distinguished blood. By the first decade of the 1800s when Theo starts thinking about marriages for his kids (we'll talk about them soon), a Bourbon or Habsburg match might be plausible. Cadet branches might be more reasonable, as you suggest, particularly the Italian secundogenitures like Naples, Parma, and Tuscany (assuming they survive whatever upheaval the alt-French Revolution has in store for them). I had specifically considered a Corsican-Tuscan match given that King Theodore II and Grand Duke Karl are personal friends and of reasonably similar ages.
I don’t think marrying a RULING royal family would be essential. It would be the best thing of course, but what’s most important to the Neuhoffs is getting a princess of good pedigree so that they can shake off the idea that they have no royal blood. A deposed princess from Tuscany,Parma, Naples etc would still be the niece/cousin of the HRE/King of Spain etc. Once the next generation have that royal blood, they are good enough to marry anyone really.There’s plenty of cases where royals of deposed royal families still got extremely good marriages in the 19th and 20th century. The Sardinian Royal family is probably the next best thing after the Italian Bourbons/Habsburgs.
 
Last edited:
The point of Corsica being a kingdom due to the title historically being royal from back when it was the property of the Papacy is an interesting one. The 18th century was OTL the last time when the historic precedents of European kingdoms was all that important - in the 19th century, it was briefly time for the major powers to try and find ways to define themselves as having emperors. However, that was in my opinion due to Napoleon getting himself declared emperor for apparent parity with the Hapsburgs. While a French revolution is still probably in the cards, it will in all probability not catapult a minor Corsican nobleman to the upper echelons of royalty OTL. Will European powers coming into contact with China and other far eastern empires whose rulers insist their title should translate as 'emperor' still cause a trend for imperial dignity being sought? Will the historic precedents of various titles continue to be significant?
 
I wonder if there are any relations between the Princes of Monaco and the Kings of Corsica, after all the Grimaldi were in many respects the Neuhoffs of the previous century who before the 1600s treaties with France and Spain granting them princely sovereignty were merely Lords of Monaco, upjumped nobles like the baronial Theodore and Frederick, descendants from the like corsair kings of the Rock of Monaco detaching themselves from Genoa off and on until it actually stuck.
 
If I may make a suggestion regarding the Napoleon Question (unless you are set on ending the TL in the 1790s), the easiest answer is to invent another Napoleon. Create an ahistorical character (maybe a Breton?) who fills the same role. It may seem like cheating, but it would allow the timeline to continue with its focus on Corsica.
 
If I may make a suggestion regarding the Napoleon Question (unless you are set on ending the TL in the 1790s), the easiest answer is to invent another Napoleon. Create an ahistorical character (maybe a Breton?) who fills the same role. It may seem like cheating, but it would allow the timeline to continue with its focus on Corsica.
Honestly there are many existing historical characters who could have stepped up to Napoleon’s position, like Bernadotte. We even have an actual Breton like Jean Moreau who probably could be an alt Napoleon. Whether they could conquer as much land(and lose it all) is a separate question.
 
Last edited:
Top