Anyway that the Khazars would not have taken over/destroyed by the Rus??
I thought they were stormed by Cumans...
No definitely Rus, Cumans only get moving later. There is a theory that there is a waning of Khazar power as the Pechenegs rise, but steppe empires usually go out with a bang rather than a long decline.
The Khazars were a bit more than your typical steppe empire, though.
Their downfall was caused by a civil war and subsequent movement of the Magyars into Hungary. It funny how much Europe owes to a the Byzantines and Khazars, and nobody seems to know it (outside of this board, of course!).
The Magyars are in Hungary from the early 10th c though? Sarkel is plundered in 965, so they are clearly hanging on.
I think the practice of not allowing the ruler to go more than a few miles from the palace an intriguing one.
I meant that the Magyars were an important part of the Khazar empire and their departure left a serious vacuum - after that, they just weren't strong enough to survive in the long-term.
I'm not sure if it's legendary or not, but when a Khagan was being enthroned, a gold chord was put around his neck and he was asked how long he would reign - if that day came, the chord was put back in a more aggressive way...
Quite an interesting cryptohistorical observation.The Khazars were a bit more than your typical steppe empire, though.
Their downfall was caused by a civil war and subsequent movement of the Magyars into Hungary. It funny how much Europe owes to a the Byzantines and Khazars, and nobody seems to know it (outside of this board, of course!).
It funny how much Europe owes to a the Byzantines and Khazars, and nobody seems to know it (outside of this board, of course!).
Anyway that the Khazars would not have taken over/destroyed by the Rus??
It's the only Jewish state except Israel.
Bearing in mind that it was Jewish only on the top with the rest of its Turkic population being still pagan...It's the only Jewish state except Israel.
Quite an interesting cryptohistorical observation.
Alas, I've always thought that a) the Magyars moved to Hungary in the end of 9th century, and almost no trace of theirs had been left at lower Volga by 965 when Svyatoslav the Brave ruined Khasaria, took Itil and then sacked Sarkel. All civil wars in Khasaria had been finished by that time as the Judaists embraced power over that Turkic nation and converted some of them into Judaism.
Bearing in mind that it was Jewish only on the top with the rest of its Turkic population being still pagan...
Oh, Muslims were hired mercenaries in Khazar armies. AFAIR, Ibn Fadlan wrote about that. What concerns Christians, I fear there were quite a few of them among Khazars themselves. Alans (Osetinians) who during some periods paid tribute were baptised in the beginning of 10th century...you mean Muslim and Christian.
Look where I am from and, maybe, then you'll come to understanding that it's a little bit more that a single Wikipedia article... Especially when I am very interested particularly in Svyatoslav's time...Abdul Hadi Pasha said:One Wikipedia article and everyone thinks they're an expert.
If you want to put it this way, OK. I doubt, however, that Magyars were a CRITICAL part of Khazar military machine. They were used as federates in fighting as well as sometimes Alans when they didn't fight Khazars, as well as 4 easternmost Pecheneg (Kangar) tribes, as well as the "Black" Bulgarians, as well as the Burtases who were obliged to supply the Khazars with 10 000 cavalry, etc... Hungarians were an important part back in the end of 9th century but I doubt they caused the crisis. It's rather a crisis within Khazaria caused their departure to the West. But the Kaganate still remained strong. Very strong!Abdul Hadi Pasha said:The Magyars were a critical component of the Khazar empire. Their departure left a bad power vacuum that caused a permanent weakening of Khazar power and left them less capable of dealing with threats