Just saw that Lucas originally wanted Foster to play Leia, not Fisher. Interesting article.
What would the series have been like had Foster secured the role? Note that her character would have been 14 years of age in the original movie as Foster is younger than Fisher (something they went with later with Queen Amidala). Assume all other characters have the same casting.
First things to think of:
1. Luke and Leia cannot be twins. The age difference is too great.
2. The actress is alive for Episode IX, should it get that far.
3. It's unlikely that Leia would have had another character as a love interest as she would likely be underage. Certainly Harrison Ford would have been too old. Maybe by Jedi but I'm not sure.
4. I doubt Leia would have all the responsibilities and duties ITTL than she does IOTL, especially in Episode IV. My guess is we'd see more of Bail Organa, at least at the beginning (can they still blow up Alderaan if they need Bail?)
Jodie Foster was almost Princess Leia in "Star Wars"
“I don’t know how good I would have been. I might have had different hair. I might have gone with a pineapple"
www.salon.com
What would the series have been like had Foster secured the role? Note that her character would have been 14 years of age in the original movie as Foster is younger than Fisher (something they went with later with Queen Amidala). Assume all other characters have the same casting.
First things to think of:
1. Luke and Leia cannot be twins. The age difference is too great.
2. The actress is alive for Episode IX, should it get that far.
3. It's unlikely that Leia would have had another character as a love interest as she would likely be underage. Certainly Harrison Ford would have been too old. Maybe by Jedi but I'm not sure.
4. I doubt Leia would have all the responsibilities and duties ITTL than she does IOTL, especially in Episode IV. My guess is we'd see more of Bail Organa, at least at the beginning (can they still blow up Alderaan if they need Bail?)
Last edited: