Garrison
Donor
What could kill FDR in '39?
A random flu or pneumonia, a sudden deterioration in his condition, or another of those long line of lunatics with guns who keep going after US presidents.
What could kill FDR in '39?
I don`t think that Britain/Soviets are powerful enough to fully occupy Germany, I think the war would end in a WW1-esque stalemate. I think that if the Nazis were pushed out of the pre 1939 USSR then both sides would be knackered and want an armistice. Similarly if Britain itself and the Med were secure then Britain would also be knackered and want an armistice.
My small contribution to a POD:
In 1933 president-elect Roosevelt is killed in the assassination attempt in Miami. The US reacts with shock and gets paranoid against immigrants (such as the assassin, Italian born Giuseppe Zangara). A mixture of Red Scare and Homeland Defense/Patriot Act divides the US further and prolonging the depression. Interest for international questions fall to an all time low.
In 1936 Huey Long, who learned several lessions from FDRs assassination and thereby prevented his own, becomes president. The following years are filled with political backstabbing, legal actions and attempts to introduce/block Longs populist agenda. Very interesting for political science, but the US became very isolationistic. The rape of Nanking 1937 raised few eyebrows and no call for sanctions were made. The military postings in the Pacific west of Pearl Harbor were downsized.
So when Germany begins WW2 the US is isolationistic, divided, in a political lock and with far lower military capacity in Asia than OTL. Japan can continue its insane invasion/occupation of China and don't have to conquer any oil sources (at least as long their money is good). Therefore no/later war in the Pacific.
An operation named 'Cannibal'?Please, we cannot stand your teasing. Give us the whole stuff. Worse than Vegetarian? To quote Blasphemer from 'Life of Brian': "Worse? How can it be WORSE?"
Schizophrenic, isolationist USA, insane militarist Japan slogging through an endless, hellish war with a fracturing China, Germany smashing itself to pieces against the USSR, the Allies exhausting themselves and laying waste to much of Europe while liberating it, instability everywhere--sounds like good TL material.
If we assume that Japan declares war on the European allies, yet not the Americans, some neutral yet pro-Axis nations may be more inclined to muck in with the Axis. Perhaps Spain, perhaps Turkey. Either of these nations joining would make the situation for the allies even more perilous.
Also, the various Latin American nations will be far more hesitant to join in without the US.
The problem is that the US is not going to tolerate Japan expanding in the Pacific even if it isn't on speaking terms with Britain and France; it would move in to 'protect' those colonies threatened by the Japanese. This why the Japanese attacked the US OTL rather than just concentrate on the European colonies, they knew they could never secure the resources they needed as long as they faced a hostile USA.
The problem is that the US is not going to tolerate Japan expanding in the Pacific even if it isn't on speaking terms with Britain and France; it would move in to 'protect' those colonies threatened by the Japanese. This why the Japanese attacked the US OTL rather than just concentrate on the European colonies, they knew they could never secure the resources they needed as long as they faced a hostile USA.
The problem is that the US is not going to tolerate Japan expanding in the Pacific even if it isn't on speaking terms with Britain and France; it would move in to 'protect' those colonies threatened by the Japanese. This why the Japanese attacked the US OTL rather than just concentrate on the European colonies, they knew they could never secure the resources they needed as long as they faced a hostile USA.
a) With POD as the one I posted above Japan would not face a trade embargo, thereby eliminating the need to conquer Malaya for oil and other raw materials. Japan could either continue its idiotic war in China forever (well, Japan would probably run out of men/money sooner or later) or attack the western forces far later.
But why would Japanese attack USSR in 1941? They tried in 1939 and got bloody nose. And it was only border skirmish. What could they expect in an all out war? Besides, attacking USSR does not in any way help them solve their pressing issue of lack of oil.
Even if they did, British would not need to declare war. Soviets would be able to clear up everything by themselves.
*Probably discussed before. I don't care since I'm discussing it now*
If the United States remained neutral in the World War (or perhaps only fought a Pacific war with Japan at most), how would events progress and how would things turn out?
I can't see the U.S. staying isolationist completely during the entire war. I think best case scenario is a WW1 type into where we show up 15 minutes into the finale and claim credit.