What would happen if instead of trying to annex the Sudetenland Hitler had decided to go after the Danzig Corridor instead?
They Poles may be far more willing to fight him for Danzig than the Czechs were for the Sudetenland. Besides, doesn't he need the industry in the Sudetenland? It would probably be best for him to go for the Sudetenland first then grab Danzig instead of gobbling up the whole of Czechoslovakia. That way he'll have the industry and if a war starts with the Poles the Western Allies may well stay out of it as he won't have broken the Munich Agreement and will still be able to present himself as simply reuniting the German lands (even if he then goes on to conquer Poland).
They Poles may be far more willing to fight him for Danzig than the Czechs were for the Sudetenland. Besides, doesn't he need the industry in the Sudetenland? It would probably be best for him to go for the Sudetenland first then grab Danzig instead of gobbling up the whole of Czechoslovakia. That way he'll have the industry and if a war starts with the Poles the Western Allies may well stay out of it as he won't have broken the Munich Agreement and will still be able to present himself as simply reuniting the German lands (even if he then goes on to conquer Poland).
They Poles may be far more willing to fight him for Danzig than the Czechs were for the Sudetenland. Besides, doesn't he need the industry in the Sudetenland? It would probably be best for him to go for the Sudetenland first then grab Danzig instead of gobbling up the whole of Czechoslovakia. That way he'll have the industry and if a war starts with the Poles the Western Allies may well stay out of it as he won't have broken the Munich Agreement and will still be able to present himself as simply reuniting the German lands (even if he then goes on to conquer Poland).
Could this work?
Well you could have a reversal where the Munich talks force Poland to give away Danzig and rights to the corridor,
Save that the Poles would have fought.
Stupid question: Realistically, why were the Allies so insistent upon Danzig's status yet willing to give up tons of Czeckoslovakian land? In retrtospect, it just seems like the Allies thought they bought off Hitler in 1938, and March 1939 proved them wrong.
What if in 1938, Hitler simply demanded Danzig as soon as he saw the Allies caving. Would be impossible to get both under the guise of attaining "peace in our time?"
Stupid question: Realistically, why were the Allies so insistent upon Danzig's status yet willing to give up tons of Czeckoslovakian land? In retrtospect, it just seems like the Allies thought they bought off Hitler in 1938, and March 1939 proved them wrong.
Stupid question: Realistically, why were the Allies so insistent upon Danzig's status yet willing to give up tons of Czeckoslovakian land? In retrtospect, it just seems like the Allies thought they bought off Hitler in 1938, and March 1939 proved them wrong.
What if in 1938, Hitler simply demanded Danzig as soon as he saw the Allies caving. Would be impossible to get both under the guise of attaining "peace in our time?"
This. I've always wondered what would have happened if Hitler had at least pretended to only be going for a "reunite all of Germany" policy.
What if in 1938, Hitler simply demanded Danzig as soon as he saw the Allies caving. Would be impossible to get both under the guise of attaining "peace in our time?
This. I've always wondered what would have happened if Hitler had at least pretended to only be going for a "reunite all of Germany" policy.
Why not a guy like Stresemann instead? Hitler was an asshole who bullied his way into getting the land. I'd much rather see someone achieve these things over a longer period of time through proper diplomacy while maintaining decent relations with the British and French.