Because we don't have enough of them already, I decided to throw this out there.
At the Battle of Chancellorsville, Robert E. Lee's army was undermanned compared to its normal strength due to the fact that 15,000 men under James Longstreet were in southern Virginia seeking to eliminate the Union presence at Suffolk and to obtain extra provisions. As a result, Lee was commanding one wing of the Army of Northern Virginia by himself rather than directing Longstreet, who normally commanded the wing.
My question is, how might the Chancellorsville Campaign have proceeded if Longstreet had not been sent to Suffolk? Without the provisions, but with both Longstreet and his forces under Pickett and John Bell Hood present, would things have gone better, worse, or the same for the Confederates?
At the Battle of Chancellorsville, Robert E. Lee's army was undermanned compared to its normal strength due to the fact that 15,000 men under James Longstreet were in southern Virginia seeking to eliminate the Union presence at Suffolk and to obtain extra provisions. As a result, Lee was commanding one wing of the Army of Northern Virginia by himself rather than directing Longstreet, who normally commanded the wing.
My question is, how might the Chancellorsville Campaign have proceeded if Longstreet had not been sent to Suffolk? Without the provisions, but with both Longstreet and his forces under Pickett and John Bell Hood present, would things have gone better, worse, or the same for the Confederates?
Last edited: