TFSmith121
Banned
Okay, I will wait and see how you let it play out
Okay, I will wait and see how you let it play out ... Best
Historically there is no evidence of a Boer officered army. There is no cause for there to be - the cards were played and the hand they were dealt didn't present that opportunity. What I am saying is, we are here for the what-ifs. The reshuffles of the deck. So I am creating a different situation. Who can say what happens in a different situation? Well as Author, I get word of god on that, but I'll try and be a plausible, logical god.
The Boers will maintain their military superiority with regards to equipment, and the Zulus will move toward a fusion of impi and commando tactics, as well as being expected to provide the bulk of any contingent in an attrition war with the British. The alliance will have it's high points and low points which will be explored by no means will the Zulu-Boer union be perfect. The Zulus have also allied with the Boers in their own wars before - After the Battle of Blood River, the Dingane-Retief treaty was found on Retief's bodily remains, providing a driving force for an overt alliance against Dingane between Prince Mpande and Pretorius.
Would Boers ever train and arm a bunch of Zulus?
Well, there is one historical incidence of such, though it is well out of this forum's purview. In 1994, it was discovered that the right-wing Afrikaner Volksfront lead by SADC General Constand Viljoen (no notes on whether he's related to Ben) and the AWB of Eugene Terreblanche had been training the paramilitary wing of the Zulu Inkatha of Mangosutho Buthalezi.
(you can see the proof of that from the horse's mouth here)
I had a look into the NNC by the way - possibly the worst equipped and lead force in the Anglo-Zulu war, they were misused by Lord Chelmsford and even the NNH were disarmed when they would have been useful. Paranoia about people who were arguably reasonably loyal (historically blacks who worked with the British were happy to work with them again and again - the Boers could do similar) was the squandering of a valuable resource by the British there. I am aware that both sides had their concerns about arming blacks - that is why the Boers went to Zululand rather than arm their own Africans. That's why they arm them only with obsolete weaponry (still better than the muskets they had been using however). The ZAR will never, for example, give gatling guns or artillery to their Zulu allies. They are to be cannonfodder, but they don't know that just yet.
Okay, I will wait and see how you let it play out ... Best