The Gold Standard vs. Bimetallism in Chicago
It was the 1896 Democratic National Convention in Chicago. The convention was divided over a key issue: should the Gold Standard be kept, or should Free Silver be implemented? The incumbent Democratic President, Grover Cleveland, was called a "Bourbon Democrat", a conservative, and a strong supporter of the Gold Standard. As the speeches debating the currency issue began, the Silverites looked to be in dire straights. Senator and former Governor Benjamin "Pitchfork Ben" Tillman of South Carolina had given a speech in favor of silver, but his statements within the speech in favor of southern sectionalism had turned off many Democrats from the rest of the nation. Senator David Hill's speech in favor of gold standard had been well-received. William Vilas of Wisconsin had made an error in defending Cleveland, but William E. Russell, the next proponent, might be able to regain the audience by a rousing pro-gold speech.
William Jennings Bryan sat in the audience, watching as Russel prepared to speak. Knowing he needed to give a strong speech in favor of silver, without coming across as a sensationalist like Tillman, he had prepared the Cross of Gold Speech. The speech would be a rousing one, that would surely give the Silverites control of the convention and most likely give Bryan the nomination. Bryan was still nervous, however. He ate a sandwich to calm his nerves as Russell began to speak.
Russel giving his speech
William J. Bryan's Cross of Gold speech was a disaster. He coughed numerous times throughout due to his irritated throat, and was unable to project his voice very loudly. Shaken by his choking and by the knowledge that he was failing to deliver the speech correctly, Bryan began to make silly mistakes, omitting words and saying the same thing twice. His grand finale failed as he coughed after the word "crucify", preventing the audience from hearing "cross of gold". As Bryan walked away from the stage to limited applause, he knew that he had failed the Democrats.
William Jennings Bryan
The Democratic Convention would vote to keep the Gold Standard on the Democratic Platform. The next day, the Democratic Party chose William Eustis Russell to be its eighteenth presidential nominee, with fellow Gold Democrat John Palmer as his running mate. Bryan, a loyal Democrat to the core, sadly endorsed the Russell/Palmer ticket and refused the Populist nomination when offered to him. The Populists, considering Russell to be little better than McKinley, chose to nominate their own candidate, choosing Senator James H. Kyle of South Dakota as their presidential nominee with Representative John Calhoun Bell of Colorado as their Vice Presidential nominee. Two groups, known as the "Silver Democrats" and "Silver Republicans" would also back the Kyle/Bell ticket.
---
So, the POD is a Russel who is not a week from death, but it young and healthy and capable of giving a good speech. With Bryan choking on his sandwich that he ate but didn't choke on during the speech in OTL, he fails to deliver a rousing speech and Russel wins the nomination. This has prevented the Democratic-Populist union on 1896, with both candidates now running separately.
As for how the election will go, I think that McKinley will still end up as President. Kyle will probably gain the western Rocky Mountain states that went to Bryan in OTL, because that was the Populist stronghold and a major area of silver mining, as well as the Great Plains states. However, I can't see him taking much support from McKinley, because any Republican opposed to him would have joined the Silver Party in OTL. The Democrats would be divided, with most of their support in the west and Great Plains going to Kyle. They'll probably still take the south though. I imagine that most Democrats who were so strongly opposed to the Silverites in OTL would have backed the Gold Democrats, not the Republicans, so McKinley would probably lose barely any votes because of that. So, is this prediction of a McKinley victory correct?
Last edited: