From The Streets of Detroit: America's Auto Powerhouse

In all three of those cases, as well as Los Angeles, Atlanta, Houston, Dallas, Philadelphia, San Diego and the San Francisco Bay area, they have it but its mixed with the commuter trains themselves when greater capacity is needed. A lot of the time during morning rush hour the heavy trains themselves will run, usually with a six-axle diesel locomotive on each end to improve acceleration, in order to be able to not hold up the S-Bahn trains and allow the fast schedules expected of them. Detroit, Columbus, Indianapolis, Washington-Baltimore, Miami and Seattle use S-Bahn style systems or are building them but also use commuter rail. Los Angeles is the big boy of the system mixing, as Metrolink there runs heavy commuter trains during peak periods to handle the traffic, while their S-Bahn trains run during the off periods.

I guess that means San Diego build a BART-style system instead of the Trolleys, and that was converted into an S-Bahn. Think the BART ITTL probably has more lines, such as on Geary Boulevard and into Marin County. Perhaps there can be a future post detailing mass transit of TTL in the United States, like the racing post.
 
Last edited:
Most of the development is in a box bordered by the Detroit River to the south, I-75 to the west and north and Lafayette Park to the east, as well as north on either side of Woodward Avenue, to State Route 10 to the west and I-75 to the east.

Confused the hell out of me for a second there. A Michigander might call that M-10, a Detroiter would go with "The Lodge." :)
 
I should probably explain, because of the wide differences, the states of the companies in question in the mid-2010s.

General Motors

The big dog of the American automobile market and the largest automaker in the world, General Motors holds about over one-third of the American market on their own (which in this case is good for about six million vehicles sold in the United States annually) and with major presence all of the world, particularly in China, Southeast Asia, Australia, Latin America and smaller presences in Europe, Africa, India and the Middle East. Headquartered in Detroit, Michigan, the company has a considerable number of outside divisions in a number of fields and sells numerous trucks, buses, diesel engines, drivetrain components, electronics for cars and components for locomotives and trains, and GM continues to own and operate Hughes Satellite Systems and thus makes pieces for communications and some military satellites. GM has grown a reputation for chasing new markets, though its massive overextension in the 2000s, in large part brought on by its investment in financial services operations, led to a reorganization and the selling of two of its major brands, Pontiac and Oldsmobile, to Canada's Magna International, as well as the selloffs of a number of other divisions. Despite that, GM has come back strong in recent times in terms of sales, vehicle quality and engineering, and GM's pioneering work in hybrid and electric cars was followed by more recent developments in biodiesel and hydrogen fuel cells.

Marques Sold in North America: Alfa Romeo, Buick, Cadillac, Chevrolet, GMC, Hummer, Lotus
Marques Sold outside North America: Baojun, Holden, Lancia, Opel, Vauxhall
Marques GM Owns Part of: DeLorean (14%), Ferrari (18%), Maserati (50%), Tesla (10%)
Outside Subsidiaries: Allison Transmissions (transmissions), Delphi (auto parts), Detroit Diesel (diesel engines), Electronic Data Systems (electronics), GM Diesel Division (trucks and truck chassis), GM Transit Division (rail cars and transit vehicles), Hughes Satellite Systems (satellites, communications), Magnetti Marelli (electronic controls), Prevost Novabus (buses)
Share of US Auto Market (2016): 32.8%

Ford
Ford is the unquestioned number two of the US auto industry, taking that position as a challenge to go after mighty GM - and truth be told, Ford's total vehicle output is much closer to GM than it would seem from the US market, as Ford has much stronger market positions in Europe, Africa and parts of Latin America and form the greatest rival to General Motors in Australia. Based in Dearborn, Michigan, Ford Motor Company is still largely controlled by the Ford family, though they in modern times only have minority ownership. Ford was saved probably facing GM's problems by CEO Alan Mulally, who got Ford out of the financial services areas in the mid-2000s before the problems with the stock market and financial industry in 2008-09 hit. Ford is the second-largest of American automakers, and includes ownership of several major marques in Europe. Ford's largest R&D work in the 1990s was the development of carbon-fiber components on larger scales for cars and its EcoBoost series of turbocharged engines, developed with the assistance of IHI, and its Sync communications system, developed in partnership with Microsoft. Ford occupies about one-sixth of the US car market.

Marques Sold in North America
: Aston Martin, Ford, Jaguar, Lincoln, Spyker, Volvo
Marques Ford Owns Part of: Gurney Austin Rover (14%), Mahindra (9%), Mazda (33.4%), Saleen (35%), Shelby American (30%)
Outside Subsidiaries: Blue Bird Body Company (school buses), Cosworth Engineering (high-performance engines and racing equipment), Carrozzeria Ghia (design company), Ford Truck (trucks and truck chassis), Hertz Rent-A-Car (car rentals), New Holland Agriculture (farm equipment), Visteon (auto parts and electronic components)
Share of US Auto Market (2016): 16.5%

Chrysler
The third of the big Detroit builders, Chrysler's history seems to have been lurching from one crisis to another, and Chrysler was way behind in the development of better cars, focusing on short-term profit - a way of thinking that very nearly killed them, as they lurched into a genuine dark hole in the 1970s - but they recovered from that through excellent products and strategic partnerships first with Mitsubishi and then with Peugeot-Citroen. While the Mitsubishi hookup drifted apart in the 1990s, the Peugeot-Citroen connection ultimately became a fusion between many aspects of the two companies, and by the Chrysler took over responsibility for marketing Peugeot's cars in America in 1991 the alliance between the two was seeing major benefits for both. Like the Renault-AMC alliance, the merger between the French and American makers led to benefits for both sides. Chrysler later bought a majority of Japanese car maker Subaru in 1997 and then brought South African maker Reynard to America in 2004 in addition to its connections with Peugeot-Citroen. Chrysler's involvement in outside brands includes involvement in the American Locomotive Company, Chrysler Defense (one of the builders of the mighty M1 Abrams tank) and a raft of supplier firms. Chrysler was for a long time based in Auburn Hills, MI and had its financial division in New York City, but Chrysler consolidated its headquarters at the Chrysler Detroit Center in Downtown Detroit upon its completion in 2015. Chrysler controls roughly 10% of the US auto market as of 2016.

Marques Sold in North America: Chrysler, Citroen, Dodge, Imperial, Peugeot, Ram, Reynard, Subaru
Marques Chrysler Owns Part of: Peugeot, Citroen (22.5%), Reynard (25%), Subaru (51%)
Outside Subsidiaries: American Locomotive Company (diesel locomotives), Chrysler Defense (armored vehicles, weapons), Chrysler Electronics (electronic components, communications), Lear Corporation (auto parts), Mopar Performance (auto parts), Pullman Company (rail cars and transit equipment), Takata Corporation (auto parts)
Share of US Auto Market (2016): 10.1%

American Motors
Founded by the merger of Nash and Hudson in 1954 and then having taken in most of remains of Studebaker, as well as buying Jeep from Kaiser in 1963, American Motors has had a turbulent history, which ultimately began to turn around with a series of revolutionary small cars in the 1970s, then a hookup with French automaker Renault in 1980 that began to bear enormous fruit after the beginning of the new Renault-AMC cars in 1982 and the introduction of the AMC Espace minivan in 1984. Renault and AMC's hookup, which ultimately came to have Renault owning 25% of AMC and AMC owning 28.5% of Renault, caused the two companies to be joined at the hip - but it proved to be to the benefit of both, particularly when AMC's legendary manager Mitt Romney wound up being the second in command at AMC in 1993, then moving to be CFO at Renault and then holding the same role at Nissan in the early 2000s before returning to AMC in 2007. American Motors' foothold was firmly established by the 1990s, and in modern times nearly all American Motors' dealers sell a combination of AMC, Renault and Jeep products, which between them form a complete lineup. The company was based in Southfield, MI, until moving its HQ to Kenosha, WI, in 1966, and then on to Chicago, IL in 1997, after AMC bought the iconic Sears Tower, renaming it the American Motors Tower.

Marques Sold in North America: Alpine, AMC, Jeep, Nissan (some dealers), Renault
Marques AMC Owns Part of: Renault (28.5%), Nissan (14%)
Outside Subsidiaries: Bendix Automotive Components (auto parts), Federal-Mogul (auto parts), Stewart-Warner (auto parts), Uniroyal (tires and rubber products), Wheel Horse (agricultural and farm machinery)
Share of US Auto Market (2016): 8.2%

Magna
One of the world's largest auto parts manufacturers became an automaker in 2009 after a deal brokered by two of Canada's largest banks saw Magna buy the successful Pontiac and Oldsmobile divisions, as well as the Asuna name and a host of rights, from General Motors when it desperately needed cash for its 2009 reorganization. That job done, Magna bought big into the auto market in North America with its two brands, Magna also began involvement in assembling cars for the Detroit makers in Europe through its Magna Steyr brand. Magna is a pioneer in that its corporate charter explicitly includes a demand to distribute profits to both shareholders and its employees, a system which has been beneficial to Magna in a number of regards. The company had no sooner worked out its takeover of the GM brands than it scored the rights to sell Fiat products in the United States and Canada, rights it has used on quite a number of occasions. Magna's huge investments in the car division - estimated at as much as $15 Billion between 2009 and 2016 - started paying off in the sales of its cars in the mid-2010s. Magna is sixth in sale in North America in the car market, with the other four Detroit builders and Toyota ahead of them, but Magna has explicitly said that they wish to move ahead of Toyota and gun for the positions held by Chrysler and American Motors.

Marques Sold in North America: Asuna, Fiat, Fiat Professional, Pontiac, Oldsmobile, TVR
Marques Magna Owns Part of: TVR (51%), Caterham (15%)
Outside Subsidiaries: CTS Car Top Systems (convertible tops), Magna Electronics (electronics and communications), Magna Motive Power (locomotives), Magna Steyr (coachbuilding and contract auto assembly), New Venture Powertrain (transmissions), Western Aluminum (metals and recycling).
Share of US Auto Market (2016): 4.1%
 
Opel and Vauxhall have in the 1980s and later have been a big help to GM's design labs, and GM in the 1980s and 1990s took a lot of Opel's work lock stock and barrel to the USA, and an awful lot of Opel people wound up moving around to other GM divisions to help with their products. A flip side of that is that GM's support of the European divisions (Opel, Vauxhall, Bedford, Lotus after 1987 and Alfa Romeo after 1999) is quite lavish, as would be expected for the division that has been such a help to the rest of the corporation.

That sounds good. I also presume, that Opel will OTOH benefit from the improved quality and imagine of American Cars. I can imagine, that unlike OTL, where Opel withdrew from the uplevel, more profitable market during the 90s, it would remain active there, if only with re-branded and slightly changed American models. One should remember, that the legenday Opel models of the 50s looked far more American than its German competitors at the time.
 
Does American Locomotive still have it's plant in Schenectady, NY. Do the cities of Upstate New York(Buffalo, Rochester, Syracuse, Utica, Schenectady, Albany, and Troy) see an population and economic recovery. And do any of these cities have light rail systems(In the case of Buffalo an larger one). How Upstate economy as a whole are the resorts of the Adirondacks and Catskills still booming.

On an Motorsports note are North Wilkesboro, and Rockingham Speedways still in use.
 
That sounds good. I also presume, that Opel will OTOH benefit from the improved quality and imagine of American Cars. I can imagine, that unlike OTL, where Opel withdrew from the uplevel, more profitable market during the 90s, it would remain active there, if only with re-branded and slightly changed American models. One should remember, that the legenday Opel models of the 50s looked far more American than its German competitors at the time.

Considering that Opel's underpinnings were used by a bunch of cars in North America and in Australia, yes Opel does stay in the upmarket sector, and they have a stronger hand in the market than OTL. The big loser in this TL in Europe is Volkswagen - Ford, GM and the French automakers are in better shape and Austin Rover is still around in the market, none of which helps Volkswagen much.
 
Does American Locomotive still have it's plant in Schenectady, NY. Do the cities of Upstate New York(Buffalo, Rochester, Syracuse, Utica, Schenectady, Albany, and Troy) see an population and economic recovery. And do any of these cities have light rail systems(In the case of Buffalo an larger one). How Upstate economy as a whole are the resorts of the Adirondacks and Catskills still booming.

On an Motorsports note are North Wilkesboro, and Rockingham Speedways still in use.

American Locomotive Company is now a division of Chrysler Corporation (has been since 1970), but its plant in Schenectady is still operating, yes. As far as economic recovery, they get something of one, namely because the Rust Belt is in better shape in general. As far as what happens to each individual city, I don't know enough to make concrete judgements, but I can't see upstate New York suffering any from the way things are ITTL. Mind you, there are gonna be at least two changes in Albany - the former Union Station, rebuilt into a bank headquarters, will be used for a train station again ITTL, and I-787 is gonna get covered over, as there is no reason for an interstate to run right next to a river through a major city.

As far as the tracks, Rockingham is still in use, North Wilkesboro isn't. North Wilkesboro's facilities are long past antiquated, and its events went to New Hampshire and Texas, both of which have their OTL NASCAR events.

And What About Tim Richmond without Aids?, Can He Continued to Race?

Tim Richmond never got AIDS in this world, and while he continued to be a playboy, he was still successful. Richmond, however, did contract Viral hepatitis in 1988, and went through a variant of the mess with drug testing that went on between him and NASCAR in early 1989. Richmond's contract with Rick Hendrick ended in 1991, and Richmond was hired to drive for Chip Ganassi in Indycars for 1992. He drove for Ganassi from 1992-1996, coming runner-up in the 1996 Indy 500.

He returned to NASCAR on a full-time basis (for Felix Sabates this time) in 1997 and 1998, before retiring in 1999 - only to have that end when Rob Dyson hired him to drive alongside fellow veteran driver Elliott Forbes-Robinson in the 1999 IMSA American Sportscar Championship. Richmond raced for Dyson in IMSA in 1999-2002 - winning the Can-Am title in 1999, and setting the pole position time at Le Mans for Chrysler in 2002. (Dyson didn't go to Le Mans that year, and didn't object to his drivers running Le Mans for other teams.) Retiring again from racing, Richmond was only retired for two years, as he returned to race in the 2005 Daytona 500 with Chip Ganassi again, and ran 25 races in NASCAR, IMSA and four Indycar events, including sitting in the middle of the front row at the 2005 Indy 500 and leading 35 laps in the race, finishing sixth. Richmond ran similar schedules in 2006 and 2007. Richmond ran his last full season in Indycars in 2008, filling in for Memo Gidley after a motorcycle accident forced him to miss half of the season, and he finished the season with Ganassi - in the process resetting the record for oldest Indycar race winner in the race at Riverside in November 2008, winning it at age 53 and resetting Mario Andretti's record for oldest driver to win an event.

Tim retired at the end of 2008, and today is a regular commentator for NBC's Indycar coverage, as well as some NASCAR events. His record stands at 34 wins and one championship in NASCAR, 11 Indycar wins and 15 wins in IMSA. He also had a major Hollywood biopic made about him. :)
 
American Locomotive Company is now a division of Chrysler Corporation (has been since 1970), but its plant in Schenectady is still operating, yes. As far as economic recovery, they get something of one, namely because the Rust Belt is in better shape in general. As far as what happens to each individual city, I don't know enough to make concrete judgements, but I can't see upstate New York suffering any from the way things are ITTL. Mind you, there are gonna be at least two changes in Albany - the former Union Station, rebuilt into a bank headquarters, will be used for a train station again ITTL, and I-787 is gonna get covered over, as there is no reason for an interstate to run right next to a river through a major city.

As far as the tracks, Rockingham is still in use, North Wilkesboro isn't. North Wilkesboro's facilities are long past antiquated, and its events went to New Hampshire and Texas, both of which have their OTL NASCAR events.

Great news for Schenectady. What is the size workforce at the plant.

Great to hear that Albany's Union Station will be used for a train station again and that the ugly I-787 and it's ramps will be coved up. I got to wonder if Schenectady's Union Station avoids getting demolish the timing would be close with rail service ending in 1969 OTL and with the station being demolish just 3 years later only have rail service return in 1979 with that tiny box of Station on the same site.
 
Last edited:
Also I Got A Question From the Streets of Detroit Universe, I Hope Other Things Exist ITTL direct from Other Stories like Ride Awake which airs on ESPN (despite of Vocal Drill Team Music (OTL Dance & Drill Teams), 80's Synth-Pop still existing in the Present (like Stephanie Landwehr singing "Let Forever Be" from 1999 which made #1 in the CHR Charts), and what about Major League Baseball how would the alignment look like?, and what about the NFL, the NBA and the NHL ITTL?
 
Great news for Schenectady. What is the size workforce at the plant.

I would suspect a workforce of about 2,000-2,500, as they do get considerable numbers of locomotive orders in this world. General Electric, Caterpillar, Chrysler-Alco and GM fight over railroad locomotive orders, but Alco's biggest sales successes in recent times was a big order for electric locomotives for Amtrak in 1986 in response to Amtrak's extension of the Northeast Corridor - Alco's new units were based on the Siemens EuroSprinter designs, and are known for being faster to accelerate and capable of hauling longer trains than the General Motors AEM-7 units built in the early 1980s. In modern times, Alco uses their own engines and chassis but teams with Siemens for electrical components, a good arrangement. Alco has also made a number of designs for export to Korea, Argentina, Brazil and New Zealand.

Great to hear that Albany's Union Station will be used for a train station again and that the ugly I-787 and it's ramps will be coved up. I got to wonder if Schenectady's Union Station avoids getting demolish the timing would be close with rail service ending in 1969 OTL and with the station being demolish just 3 years later only have rail service return in 1979 with that tiny box of Station on the same site.

That could be arranged. I did have the idea of New York State not liking the massive density in New York City as much and using a high-speed line to promote development of farther-out regions and building a high-speed line from New York to Buffalo along the Hudson and then following the Erie Canal west from Albany. Not sure if there is enough economic purpose do to so, or whether they state would swing the cost of it.
 
Considering that Opel's underpinnings were used by a bunch of cars in North America and in Australia, yes Opel does stay in the upmarket sector, and they have a stronger hand in the market than OTL. The big loser in this TL in Europe is Volkswagen - Ford, GM and the French automakers are in better shape and Austin Rover is still around in the market, none of which helps Volkswagen much.


That is quite what I would have expected. Especially the most recent halving of Opel's German market share should easily be avoided.

In case you haven't seen it, for a different thread I created an alternate advert presenting the Opel Admiral (based on the Impala) to Germany...

Opel Admiral 2013.jpg
 
That is quite what I would have expected. Especially the most recent halving of Opel's German market share should easily be avoided.

In case you haven't seen it, for a different thread I created an alternate advert presenting the Opel Admiral (based on the Impala) to Germany...

Pretty cool, especially since I know a person who works at the plant that makes the Impala, and the plant got a huge renovation in this world in the 1980s, so it may be possible to have the Admiral built in Canada and then exported to Germany. I'm envisioning that Opel in this world sells the Corsa and Astra (small cars), Insignia (mid-size sedan), Senator and Admiral (big sedans), Calibra (sports coupe based on the Insignia) and Speedster (sports car, similar chassis to the Lotus Elise). They also sell the Meriva and Safira vans and the Antara SUV. I should also point out that the newest Impala is this one:

chevroletimpala20141280.jpg


Which, if anything, looks even more like it would be good as an Opel. :)
 
Part 15: The Time of Innovation, Batteries and Biofuels, Round Two of the British Invasion, Recycling Into Cars, New Detroit Flagships, Supersonics and Spaceplanes

The election of Barack Obama as the United States' 46th President, and its first ever member of a visible minority. A beautiful wife, two very pretty teenage daughters, a very likable and politically savvy Vice-President and the public confidence of the time meant that Obama soared into office with approval ratings in the high seventies on his inauguration, while Jon Huntsman Jr. and Susan Collins headed out with extremely high approval ratings of their own, and within a year the US Navy asked Huntsman if he would approve of his name being used for the lead ship of a new class of Navy missile cruisers. He approved, and would make a point of being at the launching of USS Huntsman in 2020. Collins was hardly out of politics long, as she was offered her old Senate seat back if she wanted it - but she instead ran, and easily won, a race to be Maine's governor. She only held that position for one term before retiring, but Collins, who by the end of her term had been an elected official for most of a quarter-century, would be regarded as a very good official indeed.

2017 America was riding one of the largest waves of economic expansion in modern times - America's economy grew a remarkable 5.2% in 2016, a growth that was related to both growing industrial output and a steady rise in living standards of all classes of Americans, from the bottom on up. What was more, the idea of corporations being used as a vessel to both make money and accomplish good in the world, once regarded as at the very least naive, was now a common occurence, and those corporations which did make such efforts found them to beneficial to PR and indeed in a great many cases to sales. Automation in many industrial jobs was even starting to reverse in some cases, as in many high-worth jobs that the high cost of industrial robotics (despite decades of development) and the ability of human workers to do continuous quality control had benefits to the products produced. This was not the case in monotonous jobs, of course, but it did not escape anyone's notice that the number of man-hours worked at high-value producers such as Boeing did grow somewhat in the 2010s and 2020s, and the higher costs of labor were in some cases counteracted by the cost of robotic machines. A middle-class American worker would by this point in most cases be able to own their own home, own new cars, be able to afford plenty of luxuries in their lives and be able to send their children to colleges - and all of this had the benefit of also seeing a slow growth in America's savings rate, a fact somewhat spurred on by a slow but steady rise in interest rates in the 2010s, done to counteract the hot economy and keep inflation at minimal levels. It was a time where there was money for good purposes of nearly any sort, and it showed in the level of technical innovation in the labs of American businesses, the government and indeed lots of private inventors and designers who had a dream, and increasingly-powerful personal computers during this time, combined with better and better software for design and modeling, made it easier than ever for a skilled person to follow a dream or work on a real idea of their own.

It was no surprise that into this world automakers had to advance their ideas, too. The second generation of Ford's first entry into the all-electric car world, the Ford Focus Electric, debuted in 2013 to considerable fanfare as a real rival to cars like the Chevrolet Volt and Toyota Prius, though Nissan's launch of the newest Nissan Leaf within weeks of the Focus Electric and BMW following with the i3 city car three months later rather stole Ford's thunder. Fiat and Magna developed a version of the Fiat 500 small car with an electric motor as well, this debuting in 2014. The Focus Electric, however, was not merely a Focus with an electric motor dropped in - the car's electronics were highly-sophisticated and were able to help you plan out how to use the electric car most efficiently, and the vehicle design included everything from solar cells in the roof to help with charging and running accessories, carbon-fiber doors and polycarbonate windows, a thermal management system for the battery pack on board the car and warning sounds so that if pedestrian impacts were possible the car would audibly tell the pedestrians and the driver about the accident potential. Better still, Ford played up the fact that everything about the car was American-made - the drivetrain was made up of electric motors from Cincinatti Milcron, electronics from AMD, Motorola and Emerson Electric, batteries from RCA (and designed by them with the assistance of Dow Chemical) and most of the raw materials used to make the car being from American plants - proof that even in the global world of cars, one could still proudly wave the flag and use local suppliers.

bmwi3.jpg


A 2014 BMW i3

But while electric cars came early and often in the 2010s, and hybrids even more so, the problem of battery charging remained. The problem of recharging batteries quickly remained an issue, and while Tesla's Supercharger system was a major step forward in making the idea of a long-distance electric car viable, it did not entirely solve the problem, because the Tesla system, while immensely capable, still didn't entirely fix the problem. Battery capacities on modern electric cars varied - the Tesla Model S, for example, had a power capacity of 40 to 85 kWh, while the Focus Electric had a capacity of 23 kWh and the Nissan Leaf 24 kWh - and while these were good, even the best fact chargers using AC power could charge cars quickly, it still meant waiting periods of a half hour or more, much better than hours but not fast enough to truly be competitive. But as electrical grid technology improved on both sides of the Atlantic, as well as in Asia, Australia and Latin America, things began to change, and by the end of the 2010s the breakthrough was made.

The breakthrough originally came from Israel and Canada, in the form of a joint project between fledgling battery maker Altairnano pairing with Canadian electrical components maker Western Electric and Israeli electric car developer Better Place, which paired up in 2017 to show off development of an electric car system using a 125 kWh solid-state lithium-air battery pack and using supercapacitors as a first source of power, along with Western Electric's prototype "Nuclear Charge" system, which used a charging station using high-voltage DC current, and charging system which allowed the the batteries to all be charged simultaneously, with the power control module taking the incredibly-high incoming current (as much as 225 Amps) and chopping it up to where it was usable. The whole project was installed in a GMC Sierra HD pickup truck, and worked wonders - the system could give the vehicle its full 125 kWh in just ten minutes, a level sufficient to be used commercially, and the battery pack itself was designed to use air as an oxidizer, which gave the batteries a fabulous power-to-weight ratio, though the battery control system was needed to both control charge and discharge but also dehumidify the air going into the battery cells. The system also used a fail-safe system, shutting off automatically if there was not a 100%-certain connection between the battery control system and the charger - a fail-safe built for safety reasons, as the charge going in at this rate would be invariably fatal if one was exposed to it. The Sierra FEV (Future Electric Vehicle) was soon under examination by General Motors itself and other automakers, and similar ideas soon were under development by everyone, though with differing battery designs. Regardless of the potential issues, it was much too good of a potential opportunity to pass up, and so development began in a big hurry on the new battery system.

"It was so obvious that a lot of chemists, engineers, researchers and physicists at the major companies would be later kicking themselves for not thinking 'why did we not think of that before?' The idea of dividing down current has been the very basis of modern power grids, and the Nuclear Charge system just does what a modern power grid does on a smaller scale. Lithium-air batteries give the better power to weight ratio, and the whole system was designed with use in cars in mind. 125 kilowatt hours in ten minutes was too much potential to be ignored, and so everyone got on it right away, and the companies who developed the first such system made a killing on it."
-- Dr. Benjamin Alejandros, Researcher at the University of Southern California, interviewed by the Los Angeles Times in 2018

gmcsierra2014hdwallpape.jpg


A 2018 GMC Sierra HD pickup truck similar to the one used in development of the Nuclear Charge system


"Anyone with a brain could see that if a small company like Tesla could make a fantastic electric car, then it was only a matter of time before they became truly viable in the marketplace, and once the problem of recharge was figured out, it was off to the races. Electric cars were never going to take over the whole market, everyone knew that from the start. But there would always be a market for them, and once the job of making the system able to be charged quickly was done, the internal combustion engine had its first real rival."
-- Richard Meaden, EVO UK former editor and contributor, 2021

While the worry about fossil fuels was still as real as the sunrise, there was still room for that world to use internal combustion engines, a fact evidenced by many years of work on biofuels and the 2014 introduction of the first widely-available biodiesels. The use of corn-based E85 ethanol had been a popular act in the later 2000s and early 2010s, but corn-based ethanol by 2017 was regarded as an energy pit and contributing to problems with food prices. One answer, this one coming from Virginia company Atlantic Resources and South Dakota-based Broin Company, was the use of cellulosic ethanol made from plant waste. Their plans were based around the idea of collecting all kinds of plant waste, using a chemical process to separate the cellulose from it, then feeding the cellulose to specially-developed bacteria, which would break it down into sugars, which were then fermented with yeast. The resulting ethanol was both very pure and powerful, and the potential of it being made from what was mostly leftovers from other food or fuel production had major possibilities, particularly as the process was able to also be done with fairly minimal outside energy output, particularly when compared to corn-based ethanol fuels.

ExxonMobil, meanwhile, was working on its own way forward using methanol fuel, by using high-temperature and pressure steam in a blast furnace, converting woody biomass into water gas, then synthesizing it into fuel methanol, but Exxon faced a major issue in that methanol is a strong corrosive to a number of forms of metal, particularly aluminum - which most car engines were made mostly of by this point. Regardless, Exxon continued work on the idea, as well as on production of hydrogen, which most people figured was the fuel of the future - though the amount of hydrogen needed to make an entire economy run on it was immense, of course. The methanol system had advantages in that it could also be produced from gasification of coal as well as from biomass, providing a potential way of using America's enormous coal reserves aside from straight burning it to produce electric power.

Hess Energy offered a third approach, that being conventional gasoline made from synthetic crude, using the well-proven Fischer-Tropsch process. They proposed repurposing coal trains from western mines to plants in the Midwest instead of coal-fired power plants, and then also using unit trains to carry the synthetic crude out to refineries. They also proposed a system of plants in post-industrial eastern communities that had ready access to rail lines, creating new jobs and using existing infrastructure. The battle over what to do absorbed everyone, namely because all of the proposals for short-term alternative fuels - electric, cellulosic ethanol, methanol, synthetic crude - all had merit and all had money backing them up, a fact which made development faster and increasing supply. General Motors was a big back of electric cars, as was Ford. Chrysler, with its extensive experience in diesel engines thanks to Cummins, their locomotive division and their French partners, favored the biofuels route, particularly biodiesel. AMC, which also had diesel experience but all of whose aluminum engines had steel cylinder liners and was increasingly using direct injection, liked the alcohol fuel idea.

Both the large numbers of baby boomers buying cars and the growing young population of America also doing so was a sign that the sports car boom was due to keep going - and Magna and Gurney Austin Rover both spent the later parts of the 2010s seeking to cash in. Magna had bought famed British maker TVR from Russian Nikolai Smolensky after Frank Stronach was introduced to their cars by former owner Peter Wheeler. Upon news that TVR would be going out of production in 2009, Stronach bought it with his own funds, and merged it into Magna Automobiles when the company bought its chunk of GM. By the mid-2010s, TVR was back on form, and in 2016, their newest cars headed to North America - first to Canada, then eventually to the United States as well. The first TVRs to come to North America, the Tuscan 2 sports car and the Typhon GT, though the remake of the classic Griffith sports car began arriving in North America in 2017. The TVRs arriving had to be modified for US conditions, namely the addition of anti-lock brakes, airbags and traction control, all of which had been absent from past TVRs but which were all required by North American legislation. Magna-era TVRs also soon gained improvements to deal with problems the previous cars had, such as galvanised metal in their frames and carbon fiber-reinforced plastic bodywork to replace brittle fiberglass. The cars were soon popular in the states, owing to their awesome power to weight ratios and outlandish styling. Magna's selling of TVR was just the beginning, though.

tvrtyphon.jpg


A 2016 TVR Typhon

Gurney Austin Rover had been a result of racing legend Dan Gurney's buying of financially-crippled British behemoth British Leyland in 1981, brought about the British government's wish to sell and Gurney, who was the owner of a bunch of BL franchises, wishing not to totally lose his investment. By the 1990s, however, they were back in force - having trimmed the marques down to Austin, Rover, Triumph and Land Rover, they were back to making profits and had carved out niches, with Austin being sold as every day cars, while Rover was aimed at Jaguar, Triumph at BMW and Land Rover having a niche all of their own, though luxury SUVs from Lexus, Infiniti, Mercedes-Benz, Cadillac and Lincoln were now common and good rivals. The company by this point had carved out its American niche, while also owning nearly two-fifths of the British market and having good positions in Europe and the Middle East. The 1990s and 2000s, however, saw a raft of sports car manufacturers spring up in Great Britain, many using known names, all of which had big dreams. Makes like Lotus, TVR, Jaguar and Triumph all of a sudden had a big raft of rivals. McLaren, Marcos, Westfield, Ariel, Jensen and Ginetta all entered the sports car world in this time period, with the spectrum covered - with the Marcos Marcasite SR300, with its 3.6-liter Chevrolet V6 engine, simple chassis design and $40,000 price tag on one end, the McLaren P1 hypercar, with its state of the art engineering, hybrid-electric booster drivetrain and $1 million price tag, on the other. Most of these also used either Austin Rover or Detroit power, with Marcos and Ariel using GM power and Ginetta, Jensen and Westfield all using Ford power. Caterham made a splash with its introduction in North America in 2014 by setting up its Academy series immediately in the United States and Canada and hosting a 2014 race series using its insane Levante version of the venerable Caterham 7 sports car, an evolved variant of Colin Chapman's famous Lotus Seven of the 1960s - and the Levante became even more famous when Jeff Gordon spectacularly crashed one in one in the one-make race held at the NASCAR event at Riverside. The Ariel Atom, long famous for stretching British TV presenter Jeremy Clarkson's face in a legendary test of it, became more famous still when one was bought by Hollywood actor Josh Hutcherson, and was driven by him in a famous race against a NASCAR Sprint Cup car driven by Joey Logano where the Atom won a race between them at Mid-Ohio Sports Car Course filmed for Top Gear USA. Indeed, the Atom ultimately sold more cars in America than in any other market.

marcasitets500.jpg


A 2015 Marcos Marcasite TS500, an improved version of the SR300

caterhamlevante.jpg


A Caterham Levante

By the mid to late 2010s the United States was swelling an industry all new to it, and one which began to be a major deal for many of the people involved - that being recycling. As most materials used in industrial societies are recyclable, and that amount was growing thanks to advances in technology and recycling programs, it was soon making sense for companies to do so for profit. This had been known for some time to scrap metal merchants and the like, but time was turning this into major businesses. Detroit was a pioneer in 2011 in setting up a facility to mechanically separate household garbage and advance a recycling program, with the city able to use its recycling programs for profit after selling the collected materials to a company for re-use - and Detroit again kicked the game further but offering rebates on property taxes on this who recycle in larger amounts and a buy-back program for used consumer electronics, where broken or worn-out electronic goods would be collected by the city, with the person being paid for the goods in cash. This allowed Detroit to dramatically step up its waste diversion rate throughout the 2010s, and the city also mandated a number of preservation ordinances in the city. By the late 2010s, Detroit's Department of Conservation and Waste Management was making money for the city, and was by this point supplying raw materials to the automobile manufacturers, as well as to construction firms and other industrial producers.

Taking this one step further was companies like Bethlehem Steel and American Plastics, who would buy the recyclables from municipalities and transport them themselves to be used for new materials, with the later creating a series of programs to allow plastics, particularly those from scrapped cars and worn-out electronics, to be used for new products. American Plastics in 2016 began a program working with Fisker, AMC and Magna to provide them with parts and materials for their cars, with the company developing forms of recycling which used small amounts of new materials to develop material that was just as good as before if not better. RCA added to this in the late 2010s by offering a buyback program where a person that recycled used materials and/or batteries would be entered into a database which allowed them to purchase new goods from RCA for a cheaper price. RCA would not be the last to do this, and the overall benefits of it saw recycling rates in America swell regularly over the 2010s. Indeed, it was not just environmentally-minded cities like San Francisco, Portland and Seattle which did well here - indeed, among the cities which did the best for improving their waste conversion rates included New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, Detroit and Philadelphia. AMC hit a milestone in 2016, when they were proud to announce that their newest flagship car, the AMX4 sports car, was made over 80% of recycled materials - most of its interior, its aluminum chassis, fiberglass bodywork, glass or polycarbonate windows, magnesium alloy wheels and most of its interior components were made of recycled materials. (It didn't hurt that the AMX4 was also one of the fastest cars made in America at the time and was available for less than $60,000.) As the recycled material was of high quality and was able to be used for most parts of a car, there was benefit to it from a cost standpoint and as it didn't cause issues with vehicle quality, there was no reason not to.

AMC's introduction of the AMX4 in 2016 ran up against the similarly new for 2016 Ford Daytona, which were themselves up against the new-for-2014 SRT Viper GTS and Chevrolet Corvette C7, which of course saw them all rival each other. The AMX4 at 3275 lbs was heavier than the Daytona, but it sported the same 3.8-liter twin-turbocharged V6 as the Nissan GT-R, which AMC rated at 546 horsepower. (Nissan claimed 480 horsepower in the GT-R, but numerous tests had long proven their sandbagging on this.) The C7 Corvette sported a 5.5-liter V8 making 475 horsepower, and was slightly heavier at 3300 lbs. The Viper had an enormous 8.4-liter V10 with a massive 640 horsepower, weighing in at 3440 lbs. The Daytona also used a V10, Ford's new 6.4-liter unit, making 526 horsepower, inside the handsome Daytona coupe. The AMX4 was the only mid-engined car of the bunch and also used Lamborghini-style vertical doors, both of which made a style statement.

The first comparison of all of these cars together was by EVO America in their March 2016 issue, where they took all four and tossed them against the DeLorean MR25 and Saleen S5S Raptor, as well as the best rivals from Abroad - the Lotus Esprit, Ferrari 458 Italia, Lamborghini Gallardo, Nissan GT-R, Audi R8, TVR Typhon and Lexus LFA. They ranked the awesome Ferrari #1 overall, but put the AMX4 in second and the Corvette third, noting that the AMX4 was a handling dream and the Corvette a masterpiece in every way.

amcamxvanconcept01.jpg


A drawing of the 2016 AMC AMX4 sports car


Amongst the development of the 2010s was new rivals for some American companies. Boeing, having vanquished its rivals in the domestic aircraft industry, was seeing problems in other areas, as one of their old ideas had been taken by Bombardier in Canada and made into reality, with Bombardier's RS400 and CS300 aiming at segments of Boeing's markets. The RS400 had been designed with the ability to cruise at 45,000 feet and at Mach 0.94-0.98, which gave it a considerable speed advantage of long-distance flights over existing airliners. Bombardier's move was a surprise to Boeing, even though they had known of Bombardier's development of a 787 rival for some time. Combined with the new arrival of the Airbus A350 in 2015, the RS400 meant that Boeing's position was weakened - and Airbus' enormous A380 was hurting Boeing in the long-distance aircraft category, as the Boeing 747-8 was not as good at long-distance amenities as the double-deck A380 was, in large part because the airlines could create better amenities with A380's huge interior volume.

Boeing's answer was to take the data developed by DARPA and work on reviving its ideas of supersonic airliners. Boeing's 2747 project began in the early 2010s and would not produce a real airliner until the late 2010s, Boeing's research did indicate ways of knocking down the problem of sonic boom produced by airliners, and reduce the problem of sonic boom to a sufficient degree that it made the aircraft viable. This included a more bulbous nose to the aircraft, under-wing engines and a narrower-span wing which also used CAD designs to make waves which interfere with each other, which was helped by the use of dropping leading edges similar to the 1960s North American XB-70 bomber. The design's large lower fuselage and the need for ways of reducing sonic boom resulted in two large pods under each wing, each with two engines and intakes for said engines shaped similar to the Busemann's Biplane design, further reducing the sonic boom problem. Boeing's design was intelligent, and new of it breaking out saw the rest of the world's aircraft manufacturers get on the development of new aircraft for themselves which were meant to go supersonic.

While Boeing was doing that, a transatlantic upstart was about to upstage them. Reaction Engines Limited, a company with headquarters operations in Oxfordshire in Great Britain and New Jersey in the United States, had been working for years on a design of a single-stage to orbit spacecraft which could takeoff and fly like any other conventional aircraft, soar into space, release a payload and then fly back to Earth. Their spaceplane design, known as the Skylon, was remarkably simple, though it's major challenge was its engines. Powered by liquid hydrogen and air when in the atmosphere, at high speeds the Sabre engines would close and mix liquid oxygen from tanks in the spacecraft to allow it to race to orbit. The design was controlled remotely, though it had been designed with the ability to carry astronauts in mind. The Skylon was a genuine advancement - and as it had the potential to massively drop the price of getting a payload into space. The company's tests proved that it was possible, and this earned them in 2017 a $464 million lump of funding from DARPA and the assistance of Lockheed Martin's famed "Skunk Works" to make it fly. Reaction Engines and Lockheed Martin built the spacecraft in an amazingly short period of time, and on September 17, 2018, the Skylon flew from the first time at Reaction Engines' facility near Atsion, New Jersey, thought it flew in the middle of the night and without huge fanfare as the project was still in the development stages. It was not until July 4, 2019, when the Skylon was out in an airshow for Independence Day in New York City, the remotely-controlled Skylon flown in that case from a specially-modified Learjet 60XR with the control equipment installed. The Skylon made its first operational flight for Reaction Space Transport to deliver three commercial communications satellites on September 26, 2019, originally from Cape Canaveral, though later flights would fly off from different places. True to form, the Skylon design spawned imitators in the 2020s, as it made it possible for space to now be much be closer to the reach of smaller nations and companies alike, and it also made for the advancement of new satellites and satellite operators, and after a 2022 law passed almost simultaneously in Washington and Brussels, a requirement by satellite launchers to recover older satellites and a NASA/ESA/JAXA/CSA program to clean up the large amount of space junk revolving around the Earth, in order to make it safer for the growing number of launches into space.

skylonorbit2m.jpg


An image of the Reaction Engines Skylon A1 with an open payload bay


The world was now starting to catch up with the developed world, and it was soon apparent that the world would indeed change greatly in the 21st Century. The world's need for personal transportation was growing ever bigger, as was its need to move people and goods. The Motor City was up to that challenge, not just in America, but worldwide....

TBC...
 
Last edited:
Well Looks Like The Future Of Automobiles of the 2020's will be Going Hybridable with Electric Cars so What Would GM and Ford do about it?
 
Well Looks Like The Future Of Automobiles of the 2020's will be Going Hybridable with Electric Cars so What Would GM and Ford do about it?

GM has been developing electric cars since the 1980s, Ford since the late 1990s. Chrysler, AMC and Magna have largely paid others for the R&D job. GM introduced the Chevrolet Volt as one of the first dedicated ground-up hybrid designs in 1998 and has since then ITTL sold almost two million units of the car. Ford first went to electric cars with the Focus Electric in 2004, and while it has not sold to the same degree as the Volt, it has been a big help to their R&D efforts.

The debate of the 2010s is where to go from here. Everyone has their own idea of what to do there - electricity, renewable biofuels or gasoline made from synthetic crude processes? All three have proponents and benefits. The "Nuclear Charge" system can potentially remove one of the biggest problems with electric cars, that being recharge time. Both electrics and biofuels require the building of major distribution networks for the fuel or electricity, which are big expenses. Electricity generates no emissions, but has drawbacks from performance perspectives. Biofuels are renewable and can be made on a large scale, but aren't as good to the environment as they are still internal combustion engines.
 
Top