Forget trials. There needs to be a new Constitutional Convention since coup that led to the SACW made the original one redundant in how Senators like Huey Long and Hiram Johnson made there own fiefdoms, rule of law be damned.Elaborating: Yes, there will absolutely be trials.
NO ONE will want to give rise to the very erroneous idea that you can organize a military rebellion, overthrow the legitimate government, massacre hundreds of thousands of your compatriots, and be indirectly responsible for the deaths of millions. All of this, again, solely in the name of your own greed and desire for corporate profits...
...and the correct rule is to slap you on the wrist and ask you to please not do it again, solely because someone believed that being tough against the NatCorp leadership would have negative political consequences for themselves.
This is especially bad considering that, first of all, it's implied that the West is still hated in the future for basically looking the other way and pretending that SACW was "someone else's problem", which would make it have very little It makes sense to be so hard on the West while forgiving the NatCorp leadership.
Second, the United States uses a common law system under which, if there is another similar rebellion in the future, this precedent will bind future legislators in their attempts to impose harsh punishments.
Which makes it even less desirable NOT to show a strong hand, because you're basically telling any future rebel leader that there will be absolutely no negative consequences if he tries to do this again.
I mean while unlikely, what changes are needed after Democracy failed THIS badly for the United States?
Also I am NOT saying they should get a slap on the wrist, all I am saying is that the Rule of Law should not be ignored. As that is what lead to the breakdown of order in nations AFrica and Latin America after independence.
Last edited: