No, they didn't. They won easily, and the sorry state of their finances plus the example of Germany (to whom they are looking ITTL) convinved them they needed a low-cost model to run their gains. Hence the decision to effectively satellitise Korea and Manchuria, but not interefere overly with internal affairs. Taiwan was turned into what they considered a tropical colony, but even there the money to actually extend control over the entiure island was not there, so they didn't get to around to the more oppressive shit until the 1940s.sorry but hasn't japan not done what they did otl? like comfort woman, banning of korean language, and attempt at cultural genocide, mass looting of the nation. Japan then went all settler colony on korea. Like im not that dumb to realise china vassal wasn't the greatest but comparing japanese rule to chinese overlordship seems not equal. Afterall china fought for korea in the imjin war etc.
Basically, they decided they could not afford to follow a colonial model. And of course the propaganda line for their solution writes itself. There is plenty of racism and life as a Korean or Manchurian in Japan is oppressive and regimented, but at home, you are largely left alone. Japan's presence is limited to economic exploitation and political dominance.
Many Baden-Baden states use German gear or export versions thereof, so standardisation occurs as a side effect of that. Concerted efforts only begin in the late 20s/early 30s, when the next round of modernisation begins being planned. Here, they also get Austria-Hungary in the boat and the result is several standardised calibers, especially for high-volume stuff like infantry and AA rounds, mortar shells, and medium artillery. So in practice, it looks a lot like NATO, but the setup is very different politically. And of course there remain a lot of blind spots in easy places, like the non-interchangeable shoe laces, different types of fuel requirements for vehicles, or the current for radio and Funkortung gear.More random questions, does the grand german alliance (baden-baden nations, plus germanies allies netherlands, austria, sweden) form a atl nato? Second does this patches of alliance standardise their militaries with each other similar to nato with same types of ammo, etc.
Most of the monarchs stay in the parts of the country that was not occupied, and in some cases it gets turned into a heroic legend. And of course younger menh serve, and women volunteer for nursing or affiliated services. This is a media age, they all understand that. But they are never in actual physical danger except in the way everyone is, from random air raids and such.Can i ask what happens to the monarchies of various baden baden nations during the second war do most go to germany due to their countries being overwhelmed, any captured?. Second do any members of these monarchies do anything of note during the war, like the does polish habsburg make a stand and stay in warsaw. Do the daughters become medics? sons commanders/soldiers?
Sweden's nuclear programme is a side effect of a very muscular nuclear power industry, and because they are not bloc-free, they do not need to develop all their gear in-country. I think there will be much more of a NATO pattern, with smaller countries developing some top-notch equipment, but buying other elements wholesale. I'm not sure how that will distribute with Sweden, but they might choose to buy 'army stuff' like tanks, artillery, communications gear and AA from Germany and concentrate on deterrence weapons like nuclear-capable fighter-bombers and submarines. Realistically, this is what will pay dividends in their situation. The Netherlands will focus almost completely on the navy as they know the Germans cannot defend their colonial holdings and their land borders are reasonabnly secure, surrounded as they are by neutral Belgium, friendly Germany, and only slightly threatening Luxembourg.following on how have military industry of netherlands and sweden doing? otl didn't sweden choose to develop the gripen (or another jet) over nukes as they couldnt afford both here they have nukes.
That will be a very ambivalent view. They went into a righteous war and won, so there is an immediate rush of patriotism (and they were in a few land battles, the Dutch sent troops to the northern front and fought prominently in Finland and the St Petersburg campaign). But in the medium term, there is a lot of unease with the dependence on Germany this produced. Dutch national pride is prickly and fraught, caught between memories of great victories (in both wars) and the acceptance that they are a medium-sized European country surrounded by much bigger powers.On the netherlands how is the first russo-german war viewed? Like did netherlands ever fight any land battles? With russia being defeated did have any effect on the nation their small nation effectively blockaded russia pacific. Did patriotism and dutch i dunno opinion of themselves increase, like they are finally a strong military power to be feared.
This will create a lot of hostility, emotional scenes and deep hurt within the aristocracy, but as far as everyone else sees it, they are Russian and need not be worried about one way or the other. It's still an age where a woman is thought of as following the man she marries in all things.Random thought whats happening with the german nobility and royalty who married into russia like hessian princesses Elisabeth, and Alexandra daughters of princess alice? The former i feel like is their 'good' german, later no idea.