Suppose Lodvig had defeated Syragern in Gallia. Could we have surviving Mantric books? After Lodvig was killed the Franks were pushed out of West Gallia. And the Gothic churches became stronger. Now the Goths were already translating the Bible directly from Elnic and Hebrew. After his victory, Syragern began to translate the Bible to the Keltic in northwest Gallia. The Keltoi in Kymru, Alba and Eire followed suit.
So the Mantric countries began to use the Koinic languages in church and to tranlsate the Bible into their Koinic language.
So where does Mantric come from?
It means a learned or spiritual variant of language in opposition to to Koinic. It has the same root as Elnic math, which means learning, or Iranian mathran, which means seer. The Lithuanians also use Matykla for their ashrams. Matykla means seeing place.
So if Lodvig had won, the Gothic churches would have been beaten back, and the Church would continue to use Mantric in their worship. Also they would have kept the Mantric Bible. And it may have settled a question about the tsenton and kenton languages.
Most of the Indo-europeans use tsenton languages. Ispanic and Gallic are Tsenton as are the eastern languages.
Yes, Ispanic and Gallic languages now use sent. The only surviving kenton languages are on the fringes of Europe. These are Keltic, Elnic, and Sardu.
But isn't the Sardu vocabulary and grammar mostly Italo-mantric? Yes, but the southern Goths ruled the island for hundreds of years. The Sards could have picked up the kenton sound from them.
You have the tsenton and kenton languages. what about the folkic languages? They have hund instead. We believe that hund is derived from *shent. As Mekhiko is derived from Meshika, *khund could be derived from *shund.
The Gallics and Italics call their rulers Sesar. Where does that word come from? Oh, that comes from Herman Kaisar, who cut the Mantrics down to size at Teutoberg. As the Slavs got their word for king from Frankish Karl, the Mantrics got their word for ruler from Herman Kaisar
This came because I was wondering how we would reconstruct proto-romance if Latin books had disappeared.
So the Mantric countries began to use the Koinic languages in church and to tranlsate the Bible into their Koinic language.
So where does Mantric come from?
It means a learned or spiritual variant of language in opposition to to Koinic. It has the same root as Elnic math, which means learning, or Iranian mathran, which means seer. The Lithuanians also use Matykla for their ashrams. Matykla means seeing place.
So if Lodvig had won, the Gothic churches would have been beaten back, and the Church would continue to use Mantric in their worship. Also they would have kept the Mantric Bible. And it may have settled a question about the tsenton and kenton languages.
Most of the Indo-europeans use tsenton languages. Ispanic and Gallic are Tsenton as are the eastern languages.
Yes, Ispanic and Gallic languages now use sent. The only surviving kenton languages are on the fringes of Europe. These are Keltic, Elnic, and Sardu.
But isn't the Sardu vocabulary and grammar mostly Italo-mantric? Yes, but the southern Goths ruled the island for hundreds of years. The Sards could have picked up the kenton sound from them.
You have the tsenton and kenton languages. what about the folkic languages? They have hund instead. We believe that hund is derived from *shent. As Mekhiko is derived from Meshika, *khund could be derived from *shund.
The Gallics and Italics call their rulers Sesar. Where does that word come from? Oh, that comes from Herman Kaisar, who cut the Mantrics down to size at Teutoberg. As the Slavs got their word for king from Frankish Karl, the Mantrics got their word for ruler from Herman Kaisar
This came because I was wondering how we would reconstruct proto-romance if Latin books had disappeared.