Well, we all know what happened in the real world. Danielle Smith promised there would be no off-the-wall remarks by her candidates, and there weren't. Until AFTER they took power, and one of the surviving Tory MLAs, Tom Lukaszuk, managed to dig up that "Lake Of Fire" blog by Hunsperger, and that interview by the guy saying how he'd be a good MLA because he's "caucasian". Smith refused to reprimand her outspoken members, moderate Wildrosers cried foul, the rural SoCons took offense at the moderates, and thus started the ongoing intra-party civil war that continues to this day. I'm actually surprised they've managed to limit the defections enough to maintain their majority.
But anyway, suppose that those quotes had been revealed DURING the campaign. Part of me wants to think that Albertans would be sufficently outraged to turn against Wildrose, and maybe flock back to the PCs in a panicked fit of strategic voting.
On the other hand, this IS Alberta we're talking about. It probably wouldn't be too pessimistic to imagine that the Lake Of Fire and The White Man's Burden would actually INCREASE the party's appeal, everywhere except maybe Edmonton and a few other lonely, scattered outposts of modernity.
Any thoughts?
But anyway, suppose that those quotes had been revealed DURING the campaign. Part of me wants to think that Albertans would be sufficently outraged to turn against Wildrose, and maybe flock back to the PCs in a panicked fit of strategic voting.
On the other hand, this IS Alberta we're talking about. It probably wouldn't be too pessimistic to imagine that the Lake Of Fire and The White Man's Burden would actually INCREASE the party's appeal, everywhere except maybe Edmonton and a few other lonely, scattered outposts of modernity.
Any thoughts?
Last edited: