In OTL, the USSR won WW2, but at great cost. Huge numbers of casualties, many industries destroyed, one of the worst occupations in history, etc. etc. Then, it also lost Western Europe to the Allies.
These factors combined together probaly were a main reason in why it lost the Cold War. And that is why one could argue WW2 was almost a loss for the USSR.
Therefore, to achieve a Complete Soviet Victory, we need these terms by the end of the war.
-The war is only initially fought in the Western USSR. Soon after the start of hostilities the Germans somehow get thrown back into Poland, etc. With this, there is not such a high casualty list, nor any fierce occuption or destruction of industries. This is also very hard to do, but No Purges, and perhaps a USSR pre-emptive strike would do, perhaps getting the same effect as OTL Barbarossa, destroying/taking the all the things stockpiled for an invasion and destroying much of the Wehrmacht Army positioned for invasion and thus severely weakening them.
-The USSR must occupy all of Europe occupied by the Nazis/Italians, basically the standard 'Soviets reach the Bay of Biscay'. With this, the mighty West German, French, Italian, etc. industries fall into the hands of the East Bloc, and all of that is denied to NATO.
-The Manhattan project, through butterflies or POD should receive some sort of major setback (fire destroys apparatuses?), meanwhile the USSR instead receives the entire German atomic program to get a leap on it's rivals. And with the larger Soviet economy due to the terms higher up, perhaps that would give them a boost. Basically, we should have a Soviet Bomb earlier, or not much later than the US Bomb.
-With all that above, the Far East should also fall to the USSR. An earlier DOW on Japan will probably result in all of Korea Red, as well Hokkaido if not most of Japan. China should also fall firmly into the Soviet sphere, with parts absorbed/puppetised.
---
The hardest part here is, of course, completely curbstomping the Nazis early on so as to not have any brutal occupations of USSR territory or major losses, yet to have them conquer all they did so the USSR can take it in turn. I still think some sort of better-mobilised USSR with no purges can pull a Barborossa on Hitler, perhaps destroying the invasion force very early on. Why do I say the latter? Well, in OTL Stalin was preparing his own invasion and preparations were being stockpiled on the border. However, he refused to listen to the invasion warnings and thus all of those preparations and armour and air forces were lost to the Nazis.
However, if we reverse that with a pre-emptive attack, all of the Army divisions and resources stockpiled on the Nazi border by the Nazis may be lost to the Soviet Union, perhaps fatally crippling the Nazi War machine. But, this one is up to to you to straighten out.
---
With those terms, there also are interesting to discuss
-While Eastern Europe had no colonies, Western Europe did. Would Red France try to hold on? What would be the response in Indochina? I'm thinking the Soviet Union may just try to make all those countries Communist and seperate from their colonial masters, but...
-Would America's standing in WW2 be tarnished as there is no D-Day/liberation and thus they look like they did nothing (against the Nazis)? Since we have an earlier end of fighting in Europe, how annoed would they be with the Soviets attacking suddenly and taking most of East Asia in (the reverse of the OTL Europe situation...)? Should be interesting...
Well, members, WW2 experts, etc.? Feel free to discuss.
These factors combined together probaly were a main reason in why it lost the Cold War. And that is why one could argue WW2 was almost a loss for the USSR.
Therefore, to achieve a Complete Soviet Victory, we need these terms by the end of the war.
-The war is only initially fought in the Western USSR. Soon after the start of hostilities the Germans somehow get thrown back into Poland, etc. With this, there is not such a high casualty list, nor any fierce occuption or destruction of industries. This is also very hard to do, but No Purges, and perhaps a USSR pre-emptive strike would do, perhaps getting the same effect as OTL Barbarossa, destroying/taking the all the things stockpiled for an invasion and destroying much of the Wehrmacht Army positioned for invasion and thus severely weakening them.
-The USSR must occupy all of Europe occupied by the Nazis/Italians, basically the standard 'Soviets reach the Bay of Biscay'. With this, the mighty West German, French, Italian, etc. industries fall into the hands of the East Bloc, and all of that is denied to NATO.
-The Manhattan project, through butterflies or POD should receive some sort of major setback (fire destroys apparatuses?), meanwhile the USSR instead receives the entire German atomic program to get a leap on it's rivals. And with the larger Soviet economy due to the terms higher up, perhaps that would give them a boost. Basically, we should have a Soviet Bomb earlier, or not much later than the US Bomb.
-With all that above, the Far East should also fall to the USSR. An earlier DOW on Japan will probably result in all of Korea Red, as well Hokkaido if not most of Japan. China should also fall firmly into the Soviet sphere, with parts absorbed/puppetised.
---
The hardest part here is, of course, completely curbstomping the Nazis early on so as to not have any brutal occupations of USSR territory or major losses, yet to have them conquer all they did so the USSR can take it in turn. I still think some sort of better-mobilised USSR with no purges can pull a Barborossa on Hitler, perhaps destroying the invasion force very early on. Why do I say the latter? Well, in OTL Stalin was preparing his own invasion and preparations were being stockpiled on the border. However, he refused to listen to the invasion warnings and thus all of those preparations and armour and air forces were lost to the Nazis.
However, if we reverse that with a pre-emptive attack, all of the Army divisions and resources stockpiled on the Nazi border by the Nazis may be lost to the Soviet Union, perhaps fatally crippling the Nazi War machine. But, this one is up to to you to straighten out.
---
With those terms, there also are interesting to discuss
-While Eastern Europe had no colonies, Western Europe did. Would Red France try to hold on? What would be the response in Indochina? I'm thinking the Soviet Union may just try to make all those countries Communist and seperate from their colonial masters, but...
-Would America's standing in WW2 be tarnished as there is no D-Day/liberation and thus they look like they did nothing (against the Nazis)? Since we have an earlier end of fighting in Europe, how annoed would they be with the Soviets attacking suddenly and taking most of East Asia in (the reverse of the OTL Europe situation...)? Should be interesting...
Well, members, WW2 experts, etc.? Feel free to discuss.