Max Sinister said:No, he said, the POD wouldn't matter.
And unless the empire could make its inhabitants like it, lots of their power would be tied down. Read: Uprisings, secessions, revolutions.
zoomar said:This a pre-1900 question, right, so Russia/Britain are unlikely.
Mongols. Shortlived, sometime before AD1400
Glen Finney said:add in some good weather for invasions of Japan and the British Isles
The product of that union takes both crowns. Asia, and the rest of Continental Europe are conquered/pacified.Leej said:Yup. That's where I'm coming from.
I suppose you technically could go with a Napoleon victorious or something like that but it wouldn't last long. Peaceful unification in most places is the only way.
Glen Finney said:I agree. The Mongols would be the most likely...they almost pulled it off OTL. Give some more longevity to Genghis Khan and his family, and maybe at some point relatively early have them decide that Primogeniture was the way to go, add in some good weather for invasions of Japan and the British Isles, and we might see an Eurasian empire by 1300. Probably wouldn't hold together too well, but for perhaps a few generations there would exist the greatest land empire the world has ever known.
It doesn't work that way, if you wanted to be truly geographically accurate you'd have to go along the boundaries of tectonic plates, in which case Eurasia looks more like this:Max Sinister said:Or you could group it to America. Which distance is greater, actually - Greenland-Iceland or Iceland-Faröer?