Interesting. Sounds like Gyranos isn't quite prepared to fully defect to Athena's side....unless of course a certain Megas Tzaousios a bit too overzealous. Would be a shame if he takes an entire guard tagma with him still in Constantinople.
Somebody's going to come up with nationalism I see.The crux of his argument is that Rhomania is a large and powerful state, but one that is surrounded by other large and powerful states. These pose a threat to Rhomania that must be countered, but not by expansionism, which is too risky. Gyranos argues that Rhomania can be defended, even in the current geopolitical environment, but that requires investing internally, rather than externally. The Empire must work to cultivate what he calls ‘civic solidarity’.
To illustrate what he means, he brings up two case studies. The first is the recent battle of Baghdad; the second is that constant specter, Constantinople in the Fourth Crusade. In the battle of Baghdad, if it had just been a matter of Roman regulars versus Mesopotamian regulars, even with all the constraints under which the Armeniakon were operating, they almost certainly would’ve been able to take the city. (Whether they would’ve been able to hold it against Ottoman reinforcements until a Roman relief effort arrives is a topic he does not address.) But mass civilian resistance, while not very effective individually, on a mass scope, had been able to tilt the scales, with the painful and well-known end result.
To be fair civic, cultural, nationalism has been a thing in the Greco-Roman world for a long time, which is what it seems Gyranos is advocating rather than the more narrow ethnic nationalism that got championed later in European history post-Revolutionary France.Somebody's going to come up with nationalism I see.
It actually seems unlikely that it would be termed nationalism in universe as a result. This will be in contrast to potential nationalist movements in Germany, the constituent kingdoms of the Triunes and maybe breakaway movements in the Empire of the North (particularly Scotland).To be fair civic, cultural, nationalism has been a thing in the Greco-Roman world for a long time, which is what it seems Gyranos is advocating rather than the more narrow ethnic nationalism that got championed later in European history post-Revolutionary France.
Until after the first attempt, when the leadership of the countries around them see exactly what the Romans are doing and intervene themselves. This is how you end up with the Romans at war on every frontier (again) without even any kind of moral high ground in defending themselves against an external king trying to push his claim for the throne.Romania would be wise to adopt a "meat grinder" external policy of extreme divide and conquer: fracture the big states, and slowly devour and assimilate them.
I don't know. within the century Europe is going to be way too busy worrying about united Russia to worry about what Rhomania is doing. I think it's going to be a lot harder to ignore their growing power and play colonial games than in OTL.Until after the first attempt, when the leadership of the countries around them see exactly what the Romans are doing and intervene themselves. This is how you end up with the Romans at war on every frontier (again) without even any kind of moral high ground in defending themselves against an external king trying to push his claim for the throne.
thats my thinking. at the end of this century europe is going to be world focused and less euro focused, at least those with colonies. And Rhomania isnt in the new world. I could see spill over war coming from colonial holdings, but thats really it. Its empire building timeI don't know. within the century Europe is going to be way too busy worrying about united Russia to worry about what Rhomania is doing. I think it's going to be a lot harder to ignore their growing power and play colonial games than in OTL.
I'm definitely betting on the Russian royal family to get one of its own married into the Rhomanian one and use Rhomania as a good shield against its own enemies.I don't know. within the century Europe is going to be way too busy worrying about united Russia to worry about what Rhomania is doing. I think it's going to be a lot harder to ignore their growing power and play colonial games than in OTL.
This train of thought sounds like it could lead to the OTL European Balance of Power. Large power states carefully calibrated to counterweigh each other.
It's interesting to see Gyranos advocating for that civic unity. It's a pragmatic rationale for fixing the damage done by the various religious purges, but also creates a political rationale outside of "POWAH" to tighten in the Despotates long-term. What has me curious is how it'll be done - if imposed top-down it might be clumsy, but if places like Sicily and Egypt are reached out to in 'learning exercises' that could be a meaningful tone-change for the Empire, one that is compatible with the sale of territories to Sicily too. Probably the first steps to an active policy of uniting a 'Roman' or non-Latin Mediterranean culturally (Eastern Med Nationalism?)
Maybe the initial step to general federalisation too. It does have me continue to be curious as to how this policy would address Serbia. It could be easily conquered (as an exercise) but that would probably cause issues, but I guess Serbia and Vlachia are the real testing grounds of how that would work outside the Despotates.
I feel like a kind of federalism in the eastern Mediterranean won’t be a very difficult legal principle to create. If the emperor still retains certain legal powers, just establishing that they are also emperor of the despotates as well as the core seems sufficient, especially if the despotates are reluctant to submit to a legislature in Constantinople.
Somebody's going to come up with nationalism I see.
To be fair civic, cultural, nationalism has been a thing in the Greco-Roman world for a long time, which is what it seems Gyranos is advocating rather than the more narrow ethnic nationalism that got championed later in European history post-Revolutionary France.
It actually seems unlikely that it would be termed nationalism in universe as a result. This will be in contrast to potential nationalist movements in Germany, the constituent kingdoms of the Triunes and maybe breakaway movements in the Empire of the North (particularly Scotland).
It's pretty clear to me that this concept he's talking about is what we would call patriotism, which is loyalty to the country, not nationalism, which is a loyalty to one's Nation. This is a very important distinction when it comes to a multi-ethnic Empire, especially one which has been split up into its core, colonies, despotates, and other regions.
Romania would be wise to adopt a "meat grinder" external policy of extreme divide and conquer: fracture the big states, and slowly devour and assimilate them.
Until after the first attempt, when the leadership of the countries around them see exactly what the Romans are doing and intervene themselves. This is how you end up with the Romans at war on every frontier (again) without even any kind of moral high ground in defending themselves against an external king trying to push his claim for the throne.
I don't know. within the century Europe is going to be way too busy worrying about united Russia to worry about what Rhomania is doing. I think it's going to be a lot harder to ignore their growing power and play colonial games than in OTL.
Wonder how the Scandinavian vinland colony is doing and what it's prospects are. I hope it doesn't go the way of French Canada of being severely outpopulated and eventually conquered by another imperial polity that puts in far more effort into its colonies. Norse America is extremely cool I hope it survives
To be fair, Scandinavian Canada, especially if centered around the OTL St. Lawrence, might actually have better demographics than French Canada, if for no other reason than Scandinavia is less hospitable than France so more emigrate. Granted Scandinavia has at best a third of OTL England's population but the St. Lawrence valley is also a smaller area than the entire Atlantic seaboard.I am planning down the road, once Rhomania’s General Crisis series is over, and then a segway to India, to have a ‘Terranova Tour’. Vinland has similar issues to French Canada. Scandinavia doesn’t have the numbers by itself to power up a strong settler colony, and Canada isn’t an attractive location for settlers. It is a cool idea but it does have some inherent disadvantages.
Damaging or not the reality of the thing is that the empire IS a Greek nation state and this hasn't been exactly a new development, you can date it back to the time of the Arab conquests. When the population of the core empire is 75-80% Greek with assimilation continuing inexorably, then what you end up with is with Roman equaling Greek and vice versa with Romios and Hellene used interchangeably by the population... just like OTL one might note,Ethnic nationalism would be bad. Turning the Empire into a Greek nation-state would be extremely damaging. It would have to be some form of civic common identity, of shared values and beliefs and customs that can be adopted by anyone, and accepted as such by others in the group (this is key). To be Roman here needs to be like being Roman in the classical Empire, rather than being British or French or Russian or whatever in modern titimes
Fair enough, although 'better demographics than French Canada' is a low bar. Another aspect that might help is if German immigrants can be encouraged to go there instead of the TTL equivalent of the 13 Colonies, possibly on religious grounds.To be fair, Scandinavian Canada, especially if centered around the OTL St. Lawrence, might actually have better demographics than French Canada, if for no other reason than Scandinavia is less hospitable than France so more emigrate. Granted Scandinavia has at best a third of OTL England's population but the St. Lawrence valley is also a smaller area than the entire Atlantic seaboard.
Good points; I agree. I think the issue is the terminology I'm using and not being clear on. When I use the term 'nation-state', I default to the nation there being defined ethnically. So in this I was thinking of an ethnic-Greek nation-state. And ethnic nationalism is not well-known for its assimilationist abilities. In this case, said Vlach or Albanian or Helvetian or Tagalog-speaker can never be a Greek.Damaging or not the reality of the thing is that the empire IS a Greek nation state and this hasn't been exactly a new development, you can date it back to the time of the Arab conquests. When the population of the core empire is 75-80% Greek with assimilation continuing inexorably, then what you end up with is with Roman equaling Greek and vice versa with Romios and Hellene used interchangeably by the population... just like OTL one might note,
Does this mean that say an Albanian or a Helvetian would be excluded from said Greek identity? One might note that many of the leading proponents of Greek nationalism in OTL were Vlach and Albanian speaking, they both considered themselves Greek and were considered as Greek by the Greek speaking majority, with none bothered over the distinction. What would make Greek TTL nationalism exclusionary to differentiate it from the OTL path? If you speak Tagalog at home TTL but claim to be Greek, as described above, why you won't be accepted as one? You will be. Much to the horror of TTL Western Europeans who will be likely claiming the TTL Greeks aren't really Greek since they are not pure bred descendants of the ancients but who cares?
Are there possible breakdowns in the above? I'd say there is an obvious one... that proves the concept that the core empire is a strongly assimilationist, Greek nation state with a strongly inclusionary identity on whom it considers as Greek. The Despotates of course. What are the despotates if not the areas where the assimilationist model of the core could not work due to a strong local identity that could not be readily assimilated unlike the core empire? So the Egyptians were effectively given their own autonomous nation state to play with... while in Sicily how is Sicily breaking down at the moment? In rebellion of the Italian catholic population that does not feel part of the core identity against the Italiote Greek populations that do...
Rhomania is closer to China (think Greek=Han) than Austria-Hungary. But even if the state can deal with such things, it would be nice to not have any TTL equivalents to Uyghur or Kurdish issues.Weighing in on Greek nationalism, most ethnic groups are ignorable enough with some exceptions. Doesnt mean its preferable to a wider Roman identity.
Albanians as far as I am aware are barely not Greeks, while Bulgarians are also a small minority in rural villages. Syrians also took a significant hit and the coast is getting more and more Greek. The elephant in the room is the Armenians, who are not only a big minority, but also make up a significant part of the upper ranks of the army. They are by far the most important, and if they are not kept happy it can mean significant issues for the state. Overall, the problem is that Armenians are not only not Greek, but are also not Orthodox so neither religious or ethnic nationalism will work for them.