Italy isn't on the winning side?
I think he got confused bc usually it's winners on the left and losers on the right, but reading the top of the wikibox and the article make it clear Prussia and Italy are the losers here.
Italy isn't on the winning side?
Oh yeah, I was just too lazy to switch them around but maybe the explanation could be that this way is the convention ITTL.I think he got confused bc usually it's winners on the left and losers on the right, but reading the top of the wikibox and the article make it clear Prussia and Italy are the losers here.
I think he got confused bc usually it's winners on the left and losers on the right, but reading the top of the wikibox and the article make it clear Prussia and Italy are the losers here.
so does Kissinger travel to the USSA to meet with Chairman Richard Nixon to negotiate detente in the Kalterkrieg?The "Real" Liberal Resurgence - 1979 democratised German Empire
The disparate and divided liberal tradition of the German Empire united into one Liberal People's Party after the Weltkrieg, intending to champion a resurgence of responsible, middle-of-the-road liberalism between the social democratic experiments on their left and the strengthening reactionary conservatism on their right. Yet, at first, history did not turn out that way - it would take several decades before, somewhat surprising even the Liberals themselves, they finally achieved what they sought and established a new paradigm...
(Based on the new Kaiserreich Germany rework, set in the Demokratische Union (SPD-led coalition) path. It is a headcanon imagining of the future of Germany after their victory in the Second Weltkrieg.)
🙃so does Kissinger travel to the USSA to meet with Chairman Richard Nixon to negotiate detente in the Kalterkrieg?
What are the parties like? Some are, naturally, more obvious, but still, a little summary. I'm particularly interested in the 2 far right ones, Die Granate and the Black Front, since they seem most divergent and prone to unique directions than, say, the Communists, whose platform I think we all have a rough idea of.Infobox from my TL Selig Sind Die Toten.
The major political parties are roughly the same as OTL. The three big off-shoots of the Nazi Party are where things get interesting.What are the parties like? Some are, naturally, more obvious, but still, a little summary. I'm particularly interested in the 2 far right ones, Die Granate and the Black Front, since they seem most divergent and prone to unique directions than, say, the Communists, whose platform I think we all have a rough idea of.
The major political parties are roughly the same as OTL. The three big off-shoots of the Nazi Party are where things get interesting.
Scheubner-Richter’s NSDAP are the strongest and largest of the three. In contrast to the OTL Nazis they are monarchist, big on Christian imagery and have a big following among the clergy, and less revolutionary in their aims. The biggest ideological difference is that they are not in-favour of exterminating Russians but rather absorbing them into Germany.
The Black Front is the Strasserist wing of the party which abandoned the NSDAP after the Bamberg Conference in 1926. Their economic policies are redistributive (they advocate for the nationalisation of Jewish property and the big corporations), their social policies call for the destruction of class differences. Joseph Goebbels joins the Black Front in the 1920s and becomes its de facto leader after Strasser bails. Currently ITTL it’s been driven underground by the rise of the Nazis.
Die Granate is your standard authoritarian Conservative Party (of the Horthy/Antonescu school). It enjoys very little support but has a devoted paramilitary wing. It exists more or less as Goering’s vanity project. After the Nazis take power Goering flees to Austria and the party collapses.
It might be right to call them Ultra-Conservatives. They’re Monarchists (Crown Prince Friedrich-Wilhelm is President of TTL Nazi Germany), Völkisch, and Pan-German.Fascinating stuff.
So TTLs Nazis are more like a hyper extreme version of German monarchists than, well, the nazis.
When you say Christian, what denomination? How far into Russia do they expect to conquer if they’re “integrating Russians into Germany”?
Mmm, precisely what I thought. How does the prince like being aligned with a party that calls itself socialist?It might be right to call them Ultra-Conservatives. They’re Monarchists (Crown Prince Friedrich-Wilhelm is President of TTL Nazi Germany), Völkisch, and Pan-German.
Makes senseMany leading Nazis are Protestants. They’re supported by a broad alliance of German Protestant churches.
Not doubt On The Jews And Their Lies is a very popular book then.There’s also a pet faction of German Christians trying to unify Nazism with Lutheranism.
I'm sure that'll go great for them. Still, this kind of approach is likely to yield at least some more success than outright genocide and derision. Maybe some talk of Rus Norse ancestry, or of common Slavo-Germanic Aryan origins, or the Russian Czars' German heritage. If they were less Christian I could see them emphasizing the similarities between Germanic and Slavic pre-Christian religions. I can see them getting some more whites on board than just the OTL WaffenSS units, and maybe some collaborationist group of Russians trying to lobby the Nazis for Russo-German COEXISTENCE in the Reich rather than assimilation. Either way, it would be interesting to see a postwar presence, albeit likely a very small one, of pro Nazi Russians, Ukrainians, and Belarussians (I imagine the Nazis will still lose)As with Hitler the aim with Russia is to conquer European Russia and, tentatively, to reach the Urals. The Slavic citizens of the former USSR will then be Germanised. That’s the plan anyway…
What happens to Catholics then?It might be right to call them Ultra-Conservatives. They’re Monarchists (Crown Prince Friedrich-Wilhelm is President of TTL Nazi Germany), Völkisch, and Pan-German.
Many leading Nazis are Protestants. They’re supported by a broad alliance of German Protestant churches. There’s also a pet faction of German Christians trying to unify Nazism with Lutheranism.
As with Hitler the aim with Russia is to conquer European Russia and, tentatively, to reach the Urals. The Slavic citizens of the former USSR will then be Germanised. That’s the plan anyway…
He dislikes the radical elements (led by Police Minister Graf von Helldorff) but is willing to look past it in the name of Hohenzollern restoration. He gets on well with Chancellor Max von Scheubner-Richter, whose a lot more personable and polite than Hitler was, at least to other aristocrats.Mmm, precisely what I thought. How does the prince like being aligned with a party that calls itself socialist?
It's required reading in schools and a favourite of Chancellor Scheubner-Richter.Not doubt On The Jews And Their Lies is a very popular book then.
Oh definitely. Scheubner-Richter was IOTL a major organizer of White Russian groups. The Czar's German ancestry has already come up ITTL and Grand Duke Vladimir has taken up residence in the Bavarian Alps at the Nazis' invitation. When the German invasion of the USSR begins there will be a large network of white exiles accompanying the invasion...I'm sure that'll go great for them. Still, this kind of approach is likely to yield at least some more success than outright genocide and derision. Maybe some talk of Rus Norse ancestry, or of common Slavo-Germanic Aryan origins, or the Russian Czars' German heritage. If they were less Christian I could see them emphasizing the similarities between Germanic and Slavic pre-Christian religions. I can see them getting some more whites on board than just the OTL WaffenSS units, and maybe some collaborationist group of Russians trying to lobby the Nazis for Russo-German COEXISTENCE in the Reich rather than assimilation. Either way, it would be interesting to see a postwar presence, albeit likely a very small one, of pro Nazi Russians, Ukrainians, and Belarussians (I imagine the Nazis will still lose)