Alternate Wikipedia Infoboxes V (Do Not Post Current Politics Here)

Status
Not open for further replies.
(@TheSaint250 may appreciate this) So apparently an election day exit poll in 1996 showed Colin Powell handily beating Bill Clinton...


I did this a while back with the actual numbers from the poll. Can't find the post right now, but here's the box (I did give a little bit of swing towards Clinton just to recognize that people's opinions of Powell might change a bit over the course of a mudslinging campaign):

Oq48EhT.png
 
Somewhere in Between - Part One

YEINXBe.png

The 1992 United Kingdom general election was held on Thursday 9 April 1992, to elect 651 members to the House of Commons of the United Kingdom. The election resulted in a hung parliament, the second general election since the Second World War to do so, the first being the February 1974 election. Like the February 1974 election, the party with the most seats failed to win the popular vote, in both cases this was the Labour Party. Opinion polling in the lead up to the election had consistently showed both Labour and the Conservatives neck-and-neck, with some forecasts correctly predicting a hung parliament. In the subsequent aftermath of the election, the position of both main two party leaders came under media scrutiny. Major's position as Conservative leader was immediately viewed as untenable, even by Conservative supporting outlets, after having led the Conservatives to their worst loss of seats since 1945. Kinnock, despite leading Labour to victory as the largest party, was largely criticised due to his failure to win the popular vote, with the Conservatives retaining their largest share of the vote since 1983. Despite this, this was Labour's best performance in terms of the national vote since 1966, with a 7.9 swing in towards Labour since the previous election. This was also the first general election for the Liberal Democrats, who were preceded by the Liberal-Social Democratic Alliance.

The Conservatives attempted talks with the Liberal Democrats in forming a parliamentary pact. A Con-LibDem pact would still have been short of a majority, the Conservatives had hoped to also rely on support from the UUP in such an agreement. However, the prospect of a coalition government was not raised by the Conservatives, instead opting for a minority government relying on the support of both parties. Such negotiations ultimately failed, particularly due to the Conservatives hesitance to guarantee electoral reform, the Liberal Democrats' main campaign focus. Labour, like the Conservatives, were also reluctant to commit to electoral reform more so due to the situation they were placed in by losing the popular vote. Instead, the Labour leadership had proposed to the Liberal Democrats referendums on the question of electoral reform then on the system that would be used. Within days an agreement was finalised for a coalition, with a single referendum on Proportional Representation scheduled for 1993, as well as reform regarding other policy areas later outlined by Kinnock and Ashdown in a joint press conference at Downing Street.

John Major, knowing the impracticality of a Con-Lib-UUP agreement and the pace in which a Lab-LibDem deal was reached, announced his intention to resign as Prime Minister. Major met with Queen Elizabeth II to tender his resignation to which she accepted, and upon Major's recommendations invited Neil Kinnock to form a government in her name. Major also announced that he was resigning as Leader of the Conservative Party, thereby triggering a leadership contest. Kinnock's first act as Prime Minister was appointing Paddy Ashdown Deputy Prime Minister, beginning the first coalition government in British history to result from an election outcome.
 
Last edited:
I might make a TL out of this one day:

[ATTACHMENT]
Please do.
I did this a while back with the actual numbers from the poll. Can't find the post right now, but here's the box (I did give a little bit of swing towards Clinton just to recognize that people's opinions of Powell might change a bit over the course of a mudslinging campaign):
Really interesting scenario, but I think Powell might do slightly better in the north and potentially worse in the South. Much of this I suppose comes down to whether African-Americans pull the lever for an African-American Republican, something which has not borne out in down ballot races in recent years even with relatively moderate, reasonably well-known African-American Republican statewide candidates, such as Lynn Swan for Governor of Pennsylvania, or Michael Steele for U.S. senator from Maryland.
With the help of @TheSaint250 I am pleased to post this follow up:

That does not make sense.
>Be GOP
>Elect nation's first African-American president
>Have him be a widely-respected war hero who won a landslide victory in his first-ever political campaign
>Narrowly reject his bid for a second term in favor of a low-energy, freshman southern senator
Basically. It does not add up. Powell is not the most conservative guy in the room, sure, but the party is not going to sink a successful first term president, especially in that era. You might get Buchanan or Robertson or someone making an independent candidacy, but the party institutionally, especially in that era, will stick with Powell, particularly if he's breached the black wall, so to speak.
Somewhere in Between - Part One

[IMAGE]​

The 1992 United Kingdom general election was held on Thursday 9 April 1992, to elect 651 members to the House of Commons of the United Kingdom. The election resulted in a hung parliament, the second general election since the Second World War to do so, the first being the February 1974 election. Like the February 1974 election, the party with the most seats failed to win the popular vote, in both cases this was the Labour Party. Opinion polling in the lead up to the election had consistently showed both Labour and the Conservatives neck-and-neck, with some forecasts correctly predicting a hung parliament. In the subsequent aftermath of the election, the position of both main two party leaders came under media scrutiny. Major's position as Conservative leader was immediately viewed as untenable, even by Conservative supporting outlets, after having led the Conservatives to their worst loss of seats since 1945. Kinnock, despite leading Labour to victory as the largest party, was largely criticised due to his failure to win the popular vote, with the Conservatives retaining their largest share of the vote since 1983. Despite this, this was Labour's best performance in terms of the national vote since 1966, with a 7.9 swing in towards Labour since the previous election. This was also the first general election for the Liberal Democrats, who were preceded by the Liberal-Social Democratic Alliance.

The Conservatives attempted talks with the Liberal Democrats in forming a parliamentary pact. A Con-LibDem pact would still have been short of a majority, the Conservatives had hoped to also rely on support from the UUP in such an agreement. However, the prospect of a coalition government was not raised by the Conservatives, instead opting for a minority government relying on the support of both parties. Such negotiations ultimately failed, particularly due to the Conservatives hesitance to guarantee electoral reform, the Liberal Democrats' main campaign focus. Labour, like the Conservatives, were also reluctant to commit to electoral reform more so due to the situation they were placed in by losing the popular vote. Instead, the Labour leadership had proposed to the Liberal Democrats referendums on the question of electoral reform then on the system that would be used. Within days an agreement was finalised for a coalition, with a single referendum on Proportional Representation scheduled for 1993, as well as reform regarding other policy areas later outlined by Kinnock and Ashdown in a joint press conference at Downing Street.

John Major, knowing the impracticality of a Con-Lib-UUP agreement and the pace in which a Lab-LibDem deal was reached, announced his intention to resign as Prime Minister. Major met with Queen Elizabeth II to tender his resignation to which she accepted, and upon Major's recommendations invited Neil Kinnock to form a government in her name. Major also announced that he was resigning as Leader of the Conservative Party, thereby triggering a leadership contest. Kinnock's first act as Prime Minister was appointing Paddy Ashdown Deputy Prime Minister, beginning the first coalition government in British history to result from an election outcome.

This is a great scenario. I want to see more.
 
@Josh Poynter how did Henry IX become Duke of Brittany?
The only way I can think of is James or Anne having a cadet Breton as a mother and successfully winning a 2nd Breton Succession War.
Henry stirred up a rebellion in the region as the Bretons preffered his as king. then after the Franco-Spanish war started he signed a Non-agression pact with the Spanish before invading in 1636
 
Having gotten some help from @LeinadB93 I think I am now ready to start rebooting my Nordic Empire election series again! :D

CbqcA5g.png


(In this timeline, Sweden has retained Swedish Pomerania, Denmark has retained Holstein-Schlsewig, Finland has retained Karelia and Ingria, and since the Russians never managed to conquer Finland, Finland's traditional border at the River Kalix rather than at the River Torne has remained intact).
 
Last edited:
The United States presidential election of 1836 was the 13th quadrennial presidential election, held from Thursday, November 3, to Wednesday, December 7, 1836. In an election contested by three candidates, the National Republican nominee Daniel Webster, the American nominee Henry Clay and the Democrat nominee Hugh L. White, no candidate won a majority of the electoral vote, sending election to the House of Representatives. On February 15, 1837, the House of Representatives elected Daniel Webster as president. The 1836 presidential election was the first election in which the winner of the election lost the popular vote.

During the presidency of William H. Crawford, the Democrats lost most of their northern members, including the vice-president Martin Van Buren. They defected to Henry Clay's American Party, establishing it as major political force. The American Party was highly divided, but agreed on necessity of the national unity, compromise and balance between states' rights and federal power. American Party nominated Kentucky senator Henry Clay for the president and Ohio governor William H. Harrison, a military hero, for the vice-president. The ticket enjoyed support all over the country, encluding only Deep South and New England, which were Democrat and National Republican strongholds, respectively.

The southern-dominated Democrats nominated Tennessee senator Hugh L. White, a well-known proponent of the states' rights and jacksonian ideas. With his nomination, all hopes to reunite the northerners and the southerners of Democrat Party were lost. Instead, Democrats tried to appeal to the West, and they choose a Missouri senator, Thomas H. Benton, for the vice-president. 1836 National Republican convention chose a ticket of Massachusetts senator Daniel Webster and New York governor Francis Granger. As no one had won a majority of the electoral vote, the 1836 election became the first (and, so far, only) election to be decided in the House of Representatives under the terms of the 12th Amendment.

The 12th Amendment specified that the only three top finishers in the electoral vote were eligible to be selected by the House. Thus, all of three contenders were on the congressional ballot. Before the election, Clay denied possibility of the agreement with White. Instead, he hoped to unite with Webster. Webster, though, was the one who received most of the electoral votes, and the one who received most of the states. In the Congress, National Republicans had the majority in 11 states, Americans had in the 5, and Democrats in the 10 states. Democrats, under the patronage of Thomas Benton, tried to gain the support of western Americans to win the election, but were unsuccesful, as Clay decided to endorse Daniel Webster. With support of Ohio, Michigan and Indiana, Webster won contingent election on the first ballot. Clay still received votes of Illinois and Kentucky; White won all of the states he received in the Electoral College plus Tennessee, which delegation was the majority Democrat.

The election of 1836 marked an important turning point in American political history because of the part it played in establishing the Second Party System. In the 1830s the political party structure was still changing. Most of parties were divided regionally, and each faction was independent and oftenly changed its partisan affiliation. After the election of 1836, the American and National Republican parties merged to form the National Party. Some of the unsatisfied American members decided to rejoin the Democrats, and tried to fill the leadership vacuum which formed after Crawford and White. In the 1840s, most of the factions finally aligned themselves with the National or the Democrat party.

upload_2018-3-25_19-32-38.png
 
Last edited:
I have always seen James II as one of the worst Kings to rule over the British Isles. He did not learn from his father's mistake, carrying on as a Catholic king, trying to brush aside parliament. But what if, he had a son and wanted to pass onto him a strong and stable kingdom.

James II.png
James III.png
 
Last edited:
How do you get a half of a person?

The Nordic Empire uses a wide variety of electoral systems for its different constituencies, with most countryside constituency using FPTP, but some using what we would call French two-rounder systems. As for the cities, that's where the real problem is, with some using variations of STV and SNTV, often with one's votes being weighed in proportion to a number of factors, meaning, amusingly, that some people's votes only count as half. A few towns still uses the old system of voting based on how much you pay in tax. In the 18th century, you can find the result of some elections to the Swedish Estate of Burghers being given not in votes, but in currency. And all the way into the 20th century, for municipal government, we did indeed used weighing of votes.

Hence, some results just don't add up to nice integers. :p
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top