AHC: Make your country's 20th Century an absolute wank

Okay, so I was inspired by a similar thread, about borders. This one isn't about borders, and has far less limitations. You can change everything(short of ASB), to wank your own country, as long as your POD is after 1900. But here's the thing; don't just focus on borders, but also try to improve your country's economy, society, politics, etc.

I'll go first, with what I think is a bit extreme yet applicable nonetheless:

An earlier Army Coup & Goudi Movement in Greece mean that Eleftherios Venizelos manages to become Prime Minister of the Kingdom of Greece at some point between 1902-1908. Apart from internal reforms, he intensifies changes in the army & navy, basically copying the structures and tactics of the successful militaries of the day, and giving more and more influence to the military while at the same time stocking up on equipment, armaments, etc. That, combined with the aforementioned internal reforms, mean that by the early 1910s, Greece is in a slightly better position than it was in our timeline. Also, the Greek King, George I, manages to narrowly avoid assasination, and manages to stagger on until the 1920s, and Greece does not get a pro-German King until then.

Now, let's assume that Italy, instead of trying to take on the Ottoman Empure alone for Libya, instead conspiring with governments in the Balkans and beyond. In an agreement between Italy and the Balkan League, it is agreed that they would attack at the same time, Italy in Libya and the Balkan League in the Balkans. They do that at some point in the early 1910s, and a better prepared Greece, with its allies as well as an Ottoman Empire that has to fight on more fronts at the same time, mean that Greece manages to make more gains, better gains, and is more powerful. That means that Bulgaria has to think twice before trying to challenge her allies to get what she thinks is rightfully hers, and an alternate London Conference actually succeeds in preventing a Second Balkan War, while at the same time, Greece manages to get more bits and border adjustments in her favor, more islands, etc.

All that does not change the fundamental situation in the Balkans, and while Britain might be more irritated with Italy, and Austria quite furious, the underlying causes and eventual alliances of World War One. On schedule, the conflict begins, and Britain makes the same offer to Greece as she did in our timeline: join the war and get Cyprus. This time, with a more firmly entrenched Venizelos, as well as a king that isn't pro-German, Grece accepts, and plays a part in helping organize a much more successful Dardanelles Campaign, which, while not knocking the Ottoman Empire out of the war, does deal some heavy damage; among the dead is one Mustafa Kemal.

That means that the Ottoman war effort is more seriously damaged, Germany has to prop them up more. Other factors offset this however and the war largely goes on like it did in our timeline, with an eventual Entente Victory. That victory brings forth the Peace Treaties; a more powerful Greece is able to make even more favourable border adjustments with Bulgaria, manages to bite a chunk of Southern Albania(or Northern Epirus, as some nationalists call it even today), and gains a large sphere of influence in Anatolia, with many coast cities and more territory. Turkey is even more outraged than it would be, but without a unifying figure like Kemal, it is much harder for them to actually coalesce and beat the invading powers. They plunge into Civil War, and many pogroms are carried out. Some of them against Greeks, and the latter are used as a pretext so that Greece can invade a rump Turkey, to get even more of Anatolia; the war grinds into a stalemate, and after outside interference, it ends in a status quo ante bellum, bar some border adjustments. Turkey at the same time is ready to collapse at any minute, either by communists, republicans, or foreign interference. That permanently damages their ability to project power. In the Interwar Period, Greece makes a deal with now Fascist Italy, and for concessions in Anatolia, gains the Dodecanese. Now, Greece owns Today's Greece+Cyprus+Eastern Thrace+Ismir and the surrounding areas+Southern Albania+bits and pieces of North Macedonia and Bulgaria.

Venizelos continues to dominate Greek politics until, in a power struggle with the new King in the late 1920s, he is forced out Bismarck-style. He retires from politics, and becomes a national hero. At some point in the 1930s, a referendum is held in the -until then- Free City of Istanbul, and after some... creative vote counting, it remains a Free City, with a small margin of votes over the option to join a resurgent, fascist Turkey. That Turkey later joins the Pact of Steel, and is, right from the start, and throughout the War, an Axis power. After the outbreak of the Second World War, Turkey invades Istanbul, and captures it, prompting Greece to enter the war on the Allied side. That promptly leads to invasion by Turkey, Italy and Germany, and Greece eventually gives way.

After a liberation where the British army plays a pivotal role, and it isn't the resistance leading the fight but the British Army, order is restored, and Greece starts to rebuild, his time with a communist Turkey on the other shore. In the height of the Cold War, a richer, more democratic Greece, ditches its King, is proclaimed a Republic, and within 10 years becomes part of the inner core of the members of NATO and the European Communities. An influx of foreign money, investments and expertise mean that the Greek economy flourishes, and with economists from abroad being hired, to help direct financial policy and economic focus, Greece manages to follow an "Israel Path" to economic prosperity, with a high emphasis being placed on innovation, new technologies, and Defence industries.

At the same time, education, science and research manage to get ahead; new universities, more money being directed to them, mean that Greece is an important part of the world's of science and higher education. A student protest movement and shifts in society mean that Greece faces a tumultuous 1960s, and at the end, a new government, for the first time a socialist/social democratic government in Greece, lays the foundations of the modern welfare state of the country, taking bits and pieces from elsewhere; a health system like the British, a cradle-to-grave model from Scandinavia, and a social market economy elsewhere, as in Germany. This socialist government, ruling over a Greece more powerful, more secure and more confident, makes the first moves towards recognizing minority rights, those of the Turkish minorities and the Slavic minorities, which until then have been ostracized. Eventually, by the 1980s, the process of integration and acceptance has sped up, and Greece manages to pull it off spectacularly.

Economy-wise, more conservative-liberal governments mean that the state's purse strings are sealed tight, and even the welfare state of the aforementioned socialist governments, which would be more few and far between, isn't that expensive. At the same time, more involvement with the West and more firm commitment to it means that economic advisers are pouring in, and, given that Greece IOTL was under international economic control until the 1960s, have even more f a say in directing expenses. That leads to less clientelism and less corruption, and lower government debt.

Given that Turkey fought against the USSR in the War, it was harder for the Soviets to push back the Germans with the same speed; the iron curtain does include a smaller East Germany, Poland, Hingary and Romania, but Czechoslovakia , and a Yugoslavia including Bulgaria are firmly western aligned, as is Greece. They are weaker, and thus, when Solidarity, in 1981, launches a large protest movement against the government, that leads to a chain reaction, and popular revolutions overthrow the communist regimes; by 1984, and after a large nuclear warhead scare, Eastern Europe has started to move away from communism, with Poland, Hungary, Romania, a United Baltic Country and a reunified Germany being firmly capitalist, and joined in treaty with NATO. Russia however holds on to its Central Asian former SSRs, which are now part of a new, Union of Sovereign Republics. At this point, Turkey, has seen three regime changes and has lost three wars over the course of the 20th Century; it descends into chaos and anarchy, being a hotbed for terrorism, and experiencing something of its own warlord era.

By the 2000s, Greece is effectively a powerhouse on par with Israel or the Netherlands, with a population to match, that has seen a 20th Century that knows no failure. It is more powerful, more wealthy, larger, more educated, and just, better. I am quite sad though, because in this absolute wank, it would appear as if one has to completely, utterly screw everyone else. But isn't that the way with wanks?
 
During Russian Civil War Finland gets East Karelia and Kola. On early 1920's in Swedish Northbothnia and Finnmark (Northernmost Norway) is Finnish revolts and Finland decides support them and annexes them. In 1922 - 1924 Finland takes Svalbard. But there should be more expansionist Finland.

In early 1930's Estonia decides join to Finland. These all expansions would give huge economic and strategic benefits. Speciality there would be much of forests in East Karelia and many mineral mines more. And you get too easily defensive borders in east.
 
Last edited:

Baby Kata

Banned
After the success of the Spanish-American War, America goes on an imperialistic spree of conquest and conquers the entire Western Hemisphere.
 
After the success of the Spanish-American War, America goes on an imperialistic spree of conquest and conquers the entire Western Hemisphere.

How exactly would conquering and subsequently oppressing hundreds of millions of people improve society and politics?
 
During Russian Civil War Finland gets East Karelia and Kola. On early 1920's in Swedish Northbothnia and Finnmark (Northernmost Norway) is Finnish revolts and Finland decides support them and annexes them. In 1922 - 1924 Finland takes Svalbard. But there should be more expansionist Finland.

In early 1930's Estonia decides join to Finland. These all expansions would give huge economic and strategic benefits. Speciality there would be much of forests in East Karelia and many mineral mines more. And you get too easily defensive borders in east.

What happens to Latvia & Lithuania here?
 
Have France take Thionville and the surrounding iron mines at the beginning of WWI.
Germany fails at retaking them or taking Briey-Longwy and collapses. The war is over quickly as the German industry starves for iron, unlike the French one IOTL.
You don't have a generation of Frenchmen sacrificed in the trenches. You have a Germany which has decisively lost WWI and a surviving Tsarist Russia just out there to make sure they don't try to rise again.
France can thus focus on the colonies and Francify them.
 

Riain

Banned
Australia is pretty good, I'd just play around the edges:
  • Lower end (200-250km/h) high speed rail in the east.
  • Small nuclear power industry, maybe a single power reactor and enrichment facility
  • Alice to Darwin and Inland Rail projects completed soon after the war
  • Less enthusiastic buy in to globalization to avoid the backlash we're seeing now
  • Development of a 'joint' military capability before Vietnam and the avoidence of conscription for that war
  • Avoiding the 1972 supercar scare

That is enough to be getting on with.
 
Australia is pretty good, I'd just play around the edges:
  • Lower end (200-250km/h) high speed rail in the east.
  • Small nuclear power industry, maybe a single power reactor and enrichment facility
  • Alice to Darwin and Inland Rail projects completed soon after the war
  • Less enthusiastic buy in to globalization to avoid the backlash we're seeing now
  • Development of a 'joint' military capability before Vietnam and the avoidence of conscription for that war
  • Avoiding the 1972 supercar scare

That is enough to be getting on with.

Then Australia conquers the entire Western Hemisphere, 'cause no one would see that coming! :)
 
The Cuban Revolution either is crushed or does not conclude with a repressive communist dictatorship. As a result, leftist leaderships in other Latin American countries end up deciding to play a more careful game in regards to reform and the elites.
In particular, Brazil avoids the 1964 coup, and, without it, the excessive loans for fostering quick yet very artificial economic growth that the military junta was so obsessed with are not taken in the following decades. Brazil experiences a more dynamic and organic kind of economic growth, with the ossified elites dating from colonial times gradually having their wealth properly taxed, while the education system avoids the technocratic, alienating excesses of the OTL junta's agenda (Paulo Freire becomes more popular and better understood here rather than being ever denounced as a baby-devouring communist). In fostering south-south relations, Brazil becomes a powerhouse in this regard.
Also, perhaps no Globo TV monopoly.
 
No loss of panama, we got somehow territory all our neighboors, maybe we got even colonies in pacific and both war extra money via trade...after that, my country will squandered it anyway
 
Australia is pretty good

Have to agree. Australia has already had its serve of wankers.

Sprawl and transport, housing access density and mix, avoiding the Labor led collapse of work standards (which one do I mean?), and the genocide / child theft / land rights issues could have been done better in the c20th.
 
Mussolini's invasion of Ethiopia ends up in an utter failure, forcing him to step down from the position of Duce and to cede his position to either Italo Balbo or Galeazzo Ciano.
While this is considered a national humiliation, it is also means we don't get sanctioned by Britain and France , avoiding the international isolation that drove us to Hitler in the first place (it helps that both Balbo and Ciano didn't want any alliance with Germany in OTL), and it forces the government to focus on improving the army.
While WW2 begins like OTL, Italy avoids any alliance with Hitler thanks to both the germanophobia of the new fascist leadership and the still fresh memory of the failure in Ethiopia.
For the first few years Italy refuses to take part of the conflict, focusing on the stabilisation of Lybia and selling materials and weapons to all sides, but it is also in costant contact with the Allies.
The moment it is clear that Germany is going to lose ( like the moment the URSS retakes Uckraine), Italy declares war against Germany in exchange of some territorial gains.

Now it is important to remember that without Italy, Germany's war effort isn't slowed down by the campaign in North Africa and in the Balkans, allowing the Reich to start Barbarossa without delays and to be more successfull than OTL in Russia (not enough to win however).
This means that the war in Europe is ended by american nukes on some german cities and less russian territorial gains than OTL.
The following Cold War is characterised by a united and neutral Germany, and a third block formed by various fascist nations like Spain and Portugal led by Italy.
While this block (and the governments behind it) is the first one to fall apart thanks to a mix of internal and external pressure, Italy manages to land on its feet having completely integrated its territories in North Africa and successfully industrialised in the aftermath of WW2.
In the present day Italy is one of the main producer of oil in Europe and it is more industrialised than OTL
 
Top