In The Prince, Machiavelli wrote on Louis XII's actions in Italy as a prime example of what not to do if you want to hold newly conquered territories.
He shouldn't have empowered the Church by giving them temporal power when there were so many others who were clamoring to be his friend.
He shouldn't have brought the Spaniards in to partition the Kingdom of Naples.
When responding that he made a promise to the both of them so he can avoid war, he basically just says that its okay to break them, after all, its useless to make promises to avoid war because its just gonna happen sooner than later.
Also, a less important thing, but he says that Louis XII should have sent colonists to his new lands or at the very least just stayed in Italy to keep a closer eye on its development.
So, if he had followed his advice, at least retroactively, would he have been able to keep his conquests?
He shouldn't have empowered the Church by giving them temporal power when there were so many others who were clamoring to be his friend.
He shouldn't have brought the Spaniards in to partition the Kingdom of Naples.
When responding that he made a promise to the both of them so he can avoid war, he basically just says that its okay to break them, after all, its useless to make promises to avoid war because its just gonna happen sooner than later.
Also, a less important thing, but he says that Louis XII should have sent colonists to his new lands or at the very least just stayed in Italy to keep a closer eye on its development.
So, if he had followed his advice, at least retroactively, would he have been able to keep his conquests?