The Kharijite sect of Islam is known for it's hardline views on takfir, excommunicating Muslims who commit even the most minor of sins. However, paradoxically, the Khawarij was well-known for being the sect of choice for all sorts of social malcontents from ethnic minorities to pirates to revolutionaries. As @John7755 يوحنا states:
There appears to be a conflict between who became Khawarij and the contents of the ideology. Your challenge is to find a way for the Khawarij to be, in practice, more aligned with it's "constituents".
However, as a whole, the Khawarij were not united by anything but their hatred of stately authority. Which is why Kharijism is called such, those whom separation is constantly incumbent. It is frankly, a very unique movement that is tied irreversibly to the rebellion against Muhammad and authority explicit in the Arab mindset prior to the 14th century. Shurha unlike the common trope in Islamic circles, typically did not surface as religious fanatics of an austere nature, but as outlaws, pirates, revolutionary and other seeking massive societal change or simply a breakdown of order. This created in it, a rich tapestry of excuberant spirit unique to the movement and its cause.
Discussion: Fall of the Abbasid Hegemony.
Whilst thinking of the Abbasid period (as usual), I had an interesting thought. This thought had to do with the peculiar and particularly bloody fall of the Abbasid power. I then decided to write this, to get people's opinions on the overarching collapse. In the late 9th and early 10th century...
www.alternatehistory.com
There appears to be a conflict between who became Khawarij and the contents of the ideology. Your challenge is to find a way for the Khawarij to be, in practice, more aligned with it's "constituents".