AHC: Have more nations colonize Australia

The British were the only European power to seriously try to colonize Australia (and New Zealand). However, they were by no means the only country that had the opportunity or ability to do so; the Dutch (via the Dutch East Indies) and the Spanish (via the Philippines) already had a presence in the area, and the French or maybe even the Portuguese wouldn't have had too much trouble reaching and colonizing Australia (after all, the British did).

Bonus points if these colonies survive into the present day and result in multiple independent nations in Australia.
 
The problem with Australia is that most of it is uninhabitable. Simply put there isn't much room for colonisation. Mind you, there is still room for more than one nation though. I could easily see the west coast being colonised by another nation than the eastcoast. In theory I could see the north becoming part of a colony to the north of it. Basicly France founds a colony in western Australia, while England/Britain founds a colony in Eastern Australia, while the Dutch add northern Australia to the Dutch East Indies. Something like that is the most likely scenario, I believe. Anything else becomes a lot less likely.

To be fair, the countries could be different. For eaxample the Dutch might have founded a colony on the west coast of Australia, while the Portuguese colonise northern Australia. I think the British remain the most likely candidate for eastern Australia.
 

Riain

Banned
Abel Tasman's two voyages in 1642 and 1644 could both easily discovered the east coast of Australia and the Torres Strait, something that would most likely have lead to further voyages of discovery. I think this is the first step to colonisation, I doubt minor changes to the pattern and timeline of discovery are going to get other colonial powers interested in creating settlements.
 
Easiest way is to delay British colonisation. Say no 7 years war, or otherwise a situation post war which leaves Britain with little risk of an American revolution until at least the 1800's. No ARW, Britain can continue sending convicts to parts of North America. Combine this with a later but functionally similar French Revolution/major European war that distracts Britain for a while, and which perhaps ends with France and maybe some other powers more capable of contending with British power. Fast forward to say the 1820's/30's and Britain will be going colonising but it's not hard to see the French or even the Dutch taking a piece for strategic position/colonial prestige. Not too hard to see an early Germany or even Italy get a chunk of the dry bits with the right TL. Britain probably will still get the best bits, but there are lots of places to build settler colonies in Australia most of which will become pretty wealthy thanks to gold later in the 19th C.
 

Vuru

Banned
The only reason someone would want to colonize it is simple dickwaving and muh land, so it's difficult to stuff many countries in it simply because annexing land and making it nice costs money (when you don't do that, result is South America, Africa and other parts of the world) so few countries would be interested. But, as a thought experiment, let's see how many countries can you stuff in there:

1. Tasmania
2. South Australia (plus Victoria)
3. New South Wales
4. Western Australia
5. North Australia (NWT and north Queensland)
6. Queensland
7. Some state in the interior (like a big territory for the indigenous folk)

So you need about 6 countries for this, UK, France and the Netherlands are obvious choices but who else?

It would look roughly like this
 

Attachments

  • aus.png
    aus.png
    318.3 KB · Views: 3,328
Could Portugal ever grab the Northern Territory or the Kimberley as part of their territory in the East Indies? It wouldn't be much but an outpost (or would it?), but it would be something.
 
Just wondering if it's possible to get an Antarctic Treaty type of situation where all claims are suspended in favor of science and aboriginal "protection" (anything along the spectrum of (least likely) Star Trek non-interference all the way to Native American "civilizing" forced to private property and farming extension of white man's burden).
 
The Spanish maybe? If they are blown off course crossing the Pacific? They did for along time have that part of the world to themselves
 
Just wondering if it's possible to get an Antarctic Treaty type of situation where all claims are suspended in favor of science and aboriginal "protection" (anything along the spectrum of (least likely) Star Trek non-interference all the way to Native American "civilizing" forced to private property and farming extension of white man's burden).

I remember having a "fun" if not entirely serious proposal in such regards...

The Aborigines develop a unified civilization which is sufficiently advanced to make outside domination of it difficult enough that stray travelers cannot easily take it over, but enough that it is tantalizingly within reach for a powerful effort. Europe ultimately shows up with minimal butterflies but the situation ultimately results similar to China - nobody wants control of this vast land to fall under the control of another empire. Within Europe, the ideas of "scientific" racism and the like not only do not die, but continue to develop and grow stronger. In time, an agreement is reached between the powers which carves them up on an equal basis, keeping Australia unified but establishing international control over the continent. Ultimately, as the Australians are obviously not "people" as the Europeans see them, this is ultimately classified as a nature reserve, and is viewed as an excellent example of the protection of primitive sub-species which have not attained the civilizational level of the West and which is instead under the enlightened and benevolent administration of the "civilized" race.

Australian "cultural customs" are carefully guarded by the Europeans, as although some of the most extreme and radical European liberals (the more unscientific among them at least, who still stick to long-disproven ideas of racial equality) insist that it is perhaps possible that one day under the guiding hand of the West it may be possible that the Australians will be ready for civilization, this must be carefully brought to them, and so perhaps in 300-400 years they will be capable of some independent development. Certainly factories, advanced education, and non-Western commerce must be restricted to the greatest possible degree, to protect the local inhabitants from the strenuous conditions of the modern world. The vast majority in the West laugh at this nonsense, as the Australians are obviously inherently mired in backwardness and by dint of their racial inferiority should submit gratefully to the valiant efforts of the Australian International Indigenous Protective Authority which does such excellent work in liberating the poor Australians from themselves and bringing them the fruits of European civilization, something they can never on their own reproduce. The British Empire in particular is eager to promote this model of colonial development to their French counterparts who have foolishly adopted limited assimilation policies within their own colonies, routinely boasting of parallels within their administrative regions - which liberal opinion in America is highly enthusiastic about.

Some of the most ardent proponents of the system, citing the most recent scientific papers, argue that as a nature reserve, the logical conclusion is that hunting should be allowed upon the protected species to keep down the population. However, so far such a proposal remains under discussion and various economic firms with ties in the Australian market have expressed their disapproval. As reliable scientific evidence continues to mount which conclusively demonstrates the inferiority of all other races except for the Caucasian race however, it is no doubt inevitable that in time hunting will be legalized upon the native creatures of Australia, just as the Belgian Congo has recently done to much international interest.

(this is mostly sarcasm just to make sure I don't get banned)
 
I know that the Duchy of Kurland had some plans to try to set up a few colonies, but after the Polish war with Sweden the little duchy never recovered.
 
Let's go a more unusual colonisers.

In 1756 Denmark was looking for some estate to colonise in Asia, of course all the best places was taken, so the Danes decided to colonise the Nicobars, this attempt failed, but Denmark tried again in 1768, this failed again, and Denmark had two more attempt in the 19th century.

So let's say that Denmark have learned a lesson in 1756, and they decides to look elsewhere. They decides to set up a settlement at Swan River in Western Australia in 1768. The Dutch are somewhat unhappy about it, but they're not really willing to throw the Danes out either for a worthless pierce of wasteland. But while they negotiate with the Danes they end up in the Fourth Anglo-Dutch War and they have other things to deal with the next 35 years. So Denmark keep their small settlement and now they're looking for something to use it for.

The Austrians also was looking for a pierce of estate in Asia at the same time and also tried to colonise the Nicobars, but the Danes asked them to leave and they did. Here the Danes doesn't ask them to leave and the Austrians try to set up a colony and fails. But inspired by the Danes they decides to set up a colony in New Holland too and in 1782 they set a colony up at Daly River in the Northern Territory, the Austrians decides to go after a hotter and humid climate to have harvest tropical crops and spices.
 
Maybe a Darien scheme aimed at Australia to get Scotland colonising the place?

What year is this Accord of Amsterdam?

The Danes have the Pilbara, which I don't think you can coax much income or anything out of. It just seem to have some sandalwood, but I don't think it's good conditions for plantations of that. Maybe Danish sandalwood hunters discover the Pilbara's gold? Portugal's claim just flat out sucks. Looks like they do have Broome, so I guess they do have pearls. Otherwise there's not much there.

To make it a bit better, I'd give Cape York over to the NT border to, one power, the NT to another, and the Kimberley/Pilbara to another. The rest is good, but I think we can insert a country into Tasmania. So that's a total of seven countries. And perhaps if we're feeling generous on the definition of "Australia", have an eighth country colonise Norfolk Island.
 
If the British had succeeded during the 1806-1807 invasion of the Rio de la Plata (present-day Argentina and Uruguay), it is likely there would have been less interest in Australia and Oceania.

After all, the Rio de la Plata region could outproduce Australia in beef exports and farming, and is geographically closer, the Spanish colonial population was small but still larger than in French Canada, making assimilation more difficult.

Still, it's not far-fetched to imagine a more Atlantic-centered British Empire centered on Canada, Argentina and South Africa as Dominions, though it would produce a lot of butterflies in terms of the rest of South America and an English-speaking majority in Argentina, while possible, would be far from an assured outcome.

In such scenario much less settlers would go to Oceania, I imagine New Zealand becoming a French colony out of lack of British interest, maybe this could extend to Australia
 

CaliGuy

Banned
The British were the only European power to seriously try to colonize Australia (and New Zealand). However, they were by no means the only country that had the opportunity or ability to do so; the Dutch (via the Dutch East Indies) and the Spanish (via the Philippines) already had a presence in the area, and the French or maybe even the Portuguese wouldn't have had too much trouble reaching and colonizing Australia (after all, the British did).

Bonus points if these colonies survive into the present day and result in multiple independent nations in Australia.
What about having a less isolationist China do this? After all, if Zheng He was able to explore parts of Africa, why not also have some Chinese explorer discover Australia before the Europeans do and thus have China colonize Australia?
 
Top