A Light Shines East: A Christian Persia TL

Establishment of the Church
From “A History of the Apostolic Church” by Afshin Khorami

While it was during the ministry of Jesus that Christianity was born, it was after His death that the young Christian community began to truly grow into something of its own. Simply due to its origins in Judea, most of the early converts were Jewish, although there were many pagans as well. Thus, one of the main questions that the young church had to answer was whether or not Christians should be required to follow the laws of the Torah. In the year 50 AD, the Council of Jerusalem was called amongst the Apostles to determine this issue, among many others. The council decided that gentile converts to Christianity would not have to follow the Jewish halakha[1], but would be forbidden to eat blood, meat containing blood, and meat that had been strangled, as well as prohibiting idolatry and fornication.

Another issue decided at the council, seemingly trivial at the time, was where to establish the young church. In Jerusalem, the Christian community was persecuted by both the Jewish Sanhedrin and Roman authorities. It was decided that the city of Ctesiphon, then capital of the Arsacid or Parthian Empire, would be the new center of the church, likely due to its location along caravan routes. It was Saint Peter who set off for Ctesiphon. He initially focused on converting the local Jewish population, but would be better received by the city’s Persian and Mesopotamian inhabitants[2]. Peter would eventually be martyred at the hands of a follower of Mesopotamian polytheism[3], but coincidentally, the Apostle Paul happened to be in the city at the time of Peter’s martyrdom. Paul, who had previously preached Christianity throughout the Roman Empire, succeeded Peter as Patriarch of Ctesiphon.

As Paul was already an old man at the time, his time as Patriarch only lasted ten years, with his earlier theological writings generally being considered more important. However, in a letter to the church in Antioch over a minor dispute, Paul wrote “the successorship of Saint Peter has passed onto me.” This is taken by the Apostolic Church as evidence of their direct descent from the early church. Paul would be succeeded as Patriarch by Saint Kaveh, a convert to Christianity from Zoroastrianism. Under Kaveh’s leadership, the church would take on a distinctly Persian character. While Christianity was persecuted in Rome, in Parthia Christians were allowed to freely practice their faith so long as they I’d not cause trouble with the authorities. Ctesiphon would grow into a center of the Church, which steadily grew among the people of Parthia. The day had not come yet, but the process in which a Christianized Persia could be born had begun.
* * *
This is a reboot of my first real timeline(which can be read here). After a long break, I have decided to return to the concept. TTL will see Christianity take hold not in Rome, but in the Parthian/Persian Empire[4], while a collapsing Rome stays pagan. Without further ado, let’s begin our foray into the world of a Christian Persia.






[1]Mosaic law

[2]The apathetic attitude towards Christianity by the Jews of Ctesiphon was due to a mixture of Jesus not fitting the traditional martial image of the Jewish Messiah, the Christians lack of commitment to following halakhic law, and conversion to Christianity meaning separating themselves from the pre-existing Jewish community

[3]At the time of the POD, Ancient Mesopotamian religion was still widely practiced in the Parthian Empire, although it had changed a lot since its Bronze Age heyday, heavily syncretism game with Greek and Persian religion

[4]There is a distinction between Parthia and Persia. While “Persia” and “Iran” are usually treated as synonymous, the Persians are a specific ethnic group whose language and culture happen to be dominant within Iran. You can sort of think of it as a king to the distinction between Han and Chinese, Han language and culture are dominant, but you wouldn’t call a Hui or a Manchu “Han.” The Arsacid Dynasty who ruled Iran at the time of the POD were not Persian, but belonged to a separate but related ethic group, the Parthians. While I will generally use the term “Persia“ ITTL, as non-Iranians didn’t start calling the country “Iran” until the Pahlavi era(which will be butterflies away), one should still keep this in mind.
 
Super cool! Can't wait to see more. Very curious to see how Europe and India turns out here. We may see a more Christianized India with its proximity to Persia.
 
happy to see this story back this was one of the first ones I followed on the site, I hope it's even better than the original
 
Super cool! Can't wait to see more. Very curious to see how Europe and India turns out here. We may see a more Christianized India with its proximity to Persia.
Christianity will likely spread into India the same way Islam spread IOTL, although nothing’s for certain yet.
Glad to see this redone and looking forward to where it goes
happy to see this story back this was one of the first ones I followed on the site, I hope it's even better than the original
Glad you enjoyed the original and hopefully this one will be even better.
 
The Parthian Empire
The Parthian Empire during the time of the Apostles was a highly ethically and religiously diverse place. The Parthian Empire was ruled by the Arsacid dynasty, originally of Central Asian origin[1]. The Arsacids had conquered Persia from the Greek Seleucids, leading to a resurgence of Iranian culture. The Persians’ ancient Zoroastrian religion would receive patronage from the Arsacid kings, who sponsored the compilation of the Avesta, or the Zoroastrian holy text[2]. That said, the Parthian Empire was not without Hellenistic influences. Rather, Hellenistic culture permeated Parthian life. The Arsacid kings minted coins with Greek inscriptions on them, and when the Parthians captured the Roman general Crassus, they used his severed head as a prop in a production of Euripides’ play The Bacchae. Greek gods were widely worshipped throughout the empire, often syncretized with Iranian counterparts(for example, Zeus with Ahura Mazda, Aphrodite and Hera with Anahita, Apollo with Mithra, etc.). In addition to Greek and Persian influences, the culture of the Parthian Empire also had a strong Mesopotamian component. Mesopotamian gods such as Marduk, Ishtar, and Shamash were widely worshipped.

Aside from the empire’s Jewish and Christian minorities, most Parthians were polytheistic. A variety of Greek, Iranian, and Mesopotamian gods were worshiped, and each ethnic group and city also had its own gods who were worshipped. There was also an imperial cult around the ruling Arsacid dynasty who, like the Seleucids before them, seem to have portrayed themselves as gods or at least godlike. However, Zoroastrianism also had a strong influence on Parthian religion; the Arsacid kings took Avestan names and sponsored the Zoroastrian magi. The Zoroastrianism practiced in the Parthian Empire was not the Sasanian Zoroastrianism which most of you are probably more familiar with, which emerged as a reaction to the religious syncretism of the Parthian era and was codified by the Sasanian mobed[3] Kartir. Parthian Zoroastrianism was a decentralized, polytheistic, and highly syncretic religion. There was also a notable Buddhist presence in the empire’s eastern satrapies, but this had little effect on either the Parthian state religion or on the emerging Christian Church.

Politically, the Parthian Empire was a feudal monarchy. Numerous kingdoms and city-states existed within the Parthian Empire, swearing allegiance to the Arsacids. The Parthians maintained a threefold division in their provincial hierarchies of marzbān, xshatrap, and dizpat, inherited from the Seleucid system of satrapies, epharchies, and hyparchies. The nobility held considerable power in the Parthian Empire, even if the King of Kings held ultimate authority. There were three tiers of nobility; regional kings directly below the Arsacids were the highest, noble families related to the Arsacids by marriage were second, and the heads of local clans and territories were the lowest. Some of the nobility served as court advisers and priests. The Parthians had no standing army, but instead levied their military from local rulers. There was, however, a permanent armed guard meant to protect the King of Kings and border garrisons were maintained.

The empire was as diverse ethically as it was religiously. The Arsacids were Parthians, while most of the empire’s subjects were Persian and there were also large Syriac communities. Parthian and Greek were the empire’s official languages, while Aramaic was used as a lingua franca by the empire’s inhabitants and Middle Persian was widely spoken. The empire also had a rich literary scene; works of literature such as the love story Vis and Rāmin and the epic cycle of the Kayanian Dynasty are likely Parthian in origin. It is in this cultural context that TTL’s a Church will develop. The Church will adopt Zoroastrian influences much as it drew on Greek philosophy IOTL, while Aramaic will be used as a liturgical language in place of Greek or Latin.





[1]The Arsacids were rulers of the Parni, a Central Asian tribe of Iranic origin. The Parni conquered the Seleucid satrapy of Parthia, and over time the Parni and Parthians grew to be more or less the same people. The Parthians would gradually reconquer Iran from the declining Seleucid Empire.

[2]Originally, the Avesta was purely oral tradition. The decision to compile a written Avesta was likely at least partially influenced by Alexander’s conquests and the subsequent domination of Iran by Hellenistic culture.

[3]Zoroastrian priest
 
Great insigth in the parthian empire wich in my opinion is the last explored of the ancient persian empires, also I know in the original tl mani and kartir were christhians but I think it would be more intersting if manicheism exist and have a role in ttl christianism similar to a mix of that mithraism and arianism had otl while karthir or an equivalent plays in zoroastrianism the same that many jewish leaders play in the diaspora still waiting to see more
 
Great insigth in the parthian empire wich in my opinion is the last explored of the ancient persian empires, also I know in the original tl mani and kartir were christhians but I think it would be more intersting if manicheism exist and have a role in ttl christianism similar to a mix of that mithraism and arianism had otl while karthir or an equivalent plays in zoroastrianism the same that many jewish leaders play in the diaspora still waiting to see more
Agreed that the Parthian Empire is the least explored of the ancient Persian empires. They rarely get the same attention that the earlier Achaemenids or later Sasanian get, who are themselves often ignored in favor of the Greek and Roman empires that they coexisted with. While Kartir’s rise to prominence was pretty heavily dependent on the support of the Sasanian shahs(who will be Christian ITTL), I will likely include Mani ITTL as his OTL self. IMO, the Manichaeans are interesting and underrated, and while Mani’s upbringing might be altered by the Apostolic Church’s dominance in Mesopotamia, something akin to Manichaeism could still easily arise ITTL. Who knows, maybe a more Zoroastrian-influenced church could develop a theology similar to OTL Manichaeism.
 
Intriging concept. I'm not 100% sold on the early Christians making Ctesiphon their hub of operations when in OTL they managed to survive all the persections the Romans threw at them for centuries but seeing the Persian Empire go Christian gets a follow from me.
 
Intriging concept. I'm not 100% sold on the early Christians making Ctesiphon their hub of operations when in OTL they managed to survive all the persections the Romans threw at them for centuries but seeing the Persian Empire go Christian gets a follow from me.
Ctesiphon was chosen ITTL due to its location along major caravan routes, in addition to the lack of Roman persecution.
 
Spread of Christianity
From “A History of the Apostolic Church” by Afshin Khorami

One of the more prominent early Christian heresies were the Gnostics. The Gnostics were a highly diverse group, but they all believed that the material world was the sinful creation of an inferior demiurge which could be escaped through the attainment of gnosis, or divine wisdom. In many places, the Gnostics were among the first to introduce Christianity, although in Parthia they were unable to compete with the Apostolic Church. One of the more prominent Gnostics was Marcion of Sinope, who taught that the God of the Old Testament and the God of the New Testament were two separate entities, with the former being a malevolent spirit inferior to the latter. Marcion is also notable for being among the first to codify the Bible, although Marcion’s Bible is considerably different from the one we know today. In accordance with his theology, the entirety of the Old Testament was removed from Marcion’s Bible, as was much of the New. Instead, he had only a few Pauline Epistles and his own Gospel of Marcion.

While Marcion himself is generally considered a footnote in the history of Christianity, he forced the early church to formally compile the Bible in response to Marcion’s codex[1]. It was around this time that the Apostolic Church came to fully develop its theology, and when the church began to definitively split in two. While the Apostolic Church based out of Ctesiphon was establishing itself in the Parthian Empire, elsewhere Christianity took a different turn. Roman Egypt was the largest stronghold of Christianity outside the Arsacid realm. The local church was based out of Alexandria, and used Coptic rather than Syriac as their liturgical language. However, while the Apostolic Church taught that Jesus was both God and man, in Egypt Gnosticism thrived[2]. Meanwhile, Marcionism established itself as the dominant form of Christianity in Asia Minor, although it never would gradually decline in the face of a resurgent Hellenism.

Back in Parthia, the Apostolic Church would gain a foothold in Mesopotamia over the course of the First and Second Centuries. The Church would gradually replace the region’s ancient pagan religion, becoming a majority in the Syriac-speaking parts of the Empire. In Persia-proper, the church would have comparably less success as the Zoroastrian magi held firm influence, although it managed to establish itself as a prominent minority in most major cities. Christianity would absorb certain Zoroastrian concepts. The Church took the position that the Ahura Mazda that Zarathustra spoke of had been the God of the Bible, but that his message was corrupted over time. The Jewish concept of the messiah was syncretized with the Zoroastrian concept of the saoshyant, with Christian missionaries in Persia referring to Jesus in Zoroastrian terms. By the dawn of the Third Century, Christianity had established itself throughout the Parthian Empire.




[1]The Apostolic Bible is similar to the OTL Catholic and Orthodox Bibles

[2]Gnosticism was very prominent in Egypt IOTL, but gradually declined as the proto-orthodox church consolidated itself. With TTL’s proto-orthodoxy based out of Ctesiphon and focused on Parthia, Gnostic inspired doctrines will be much more influential among Roman Christians.
 
While I am sad to see that the other TL go after all that hard work you put into it I am liking what’s been happening so far so good job and keep up the good work
 
It's back!

I am curious about the ITTL bible although I can see the gospels, the acts and various of the epistoles been in I can see some of the books (*cough*apocalypse*cough) not been included and books exclusive of TTL, also it would be intersting to have a chapter dedicated to the various theology of ITTL church

Also an idea I have is the seven archangels of the bible taking some characteristics from the seven amesha spenta
 
On that note, what could be interesting could be discussing how Christianity syncretizes with local traditions not just in Eran but also in India, Southeast Asia, and China.
 
On that note, what could be interesting could be discussing how Christianity syncretizes with local traditions not just in Eran but also in India, Southeast Asia, and China.
Yeah somethingh I have think is that since the bible only mentions the name of three of the seven archangels this TL may have some of them with suspiciously persian names
 
I am curious about the ITTL bible although I can see the gospels, the acts and various of the epistoles been in I can see some of the books (*cough*apocalypse*cough) not been included and books exclusive of TTL, also it would be intersting to have a chapter dedicated to the various theology of ITTL church
There will be a future update dedicated to TTL’s Bible. It’s largely similar to OTL, but as you have stated there will be a few major differences. Also, ITTL the Bible is written in Syriac.
On that note, what could be interesting could be discussing how Christianity syncretizes with local traditions not just in Eran but also in India, Southeast Asia, and China.
TTL’s Christianity will absorb numerous Zoroastrian concepts, somewhat comparable to the influence Greek philosophy had on Christianity IOTL. As Christianity spreads elsewhere, it will pick up local characteristics, as it did IOTL. So for example, you might see some Hindu or Tengrist deity becoming a saint, similar to Saint Brigid IOTL.
Also an idea I have is the seven archangels of the bible taking some characteristics from the seven amesha spenta
Yeah somethingh I have think is that since the bible only mentions the name of three of the seven archangels this TL may have some of them with suspiciously persian names
I like that idea. The Amesha Spenta could syncretized very easily with the Christian concept of angels/archangels.
 
I wonder if the Gnostics might be to TTL what Arianism was to OTL: a dissident version of the religion that lost out in the main empire the religion started in, but gains a foothold in the peripherals of the empire and among enemies of it.

Can't help but think the Zoroastrian religious leaders and other Persian elites will eventually try at least one persecution of Christians. The idea behind Persian tolerance of local religious and customs was to ensure the conquered locals were loyal to the new regime, not to let said religions overtake them.
 
Top