Or Constantinople can just say that the Turks had no power over the churches and either give them back to the Orthodox Church or be a claimed as traitors to Christianity for accepting Muslim gifts.
To which the response would be that Saladin, after retaking Jerusalem, turned over administration of the Church of the Holy Sepulcher to the Orthodox Patriarch, and considering the long history of Muslim rule in Syria, Palestine, and areas of Anatolia, that is far from the only Muslim gift the Orthodox Church has happily taken.
Time for another purge of the Muslims then. Compensate the minority heretics with Muslim slaves. Is this what the Great Crime is going to entail?
Wouldn't be surprised if that is how Constantinople splits the difference. The heretic churches keep their gains and the Orthodox Church gains a lot of newly acquired mosques.
The issue is that the religious sites have historic/cultural/religious significance and so swapping them out for just another patch of land or building just isn’t the same. It’s like when I order something and there’s some kind of issue. The company refunds my money but I don’t want my money back, I want the product.
Don't know what are the level of problems in Italy, but the most likely response on the empire's part on Ibrahim's shenannigans is an immediate declaration of war. The empire can't afford NOT to declare war.
I’m saving the Italy issues for its own update (which will be the opening for the swing back to events in Latin Europe) but they’re bad and Ibrahim knows he doesn’t have to worry about that.
Industrial Age and Technical Details: It’s good to see people’s responses to this. I don’t want to stop there (because I want my Romans in space, damnit!) and I do have some ideas already for Rhomania in an Industrial world. But I can’t explore the forest if people insist on obsessing over a few leaves. Not saying that anyone here will demand that, but it is a concern.
As for the monastery issue, offer them all a choice. Give the monasteries back and get one day a week to preach in the Church of Holy Seplucher, or keep them and lose the right to even have pilgrims visit. I think most will choose the first. I also expect that the Roman Empire is going to force holy land transfers as part of the peace deal as a bit of petty revenge since Eastern Christians, Shia, and Sunni all share sites out there. I expect Rome will start treating what Christians are left in the Ottoman Empire much like Russia did to the Ones in the OTL empire.
The issue with that idea is that the threat would be met with laughter. The Orthodox Church could certainly deny non-Orthodox pilgrims access, except pilgrims give donations. The Orthodox Church would be shooting themselves in the foot here and the other denominations and the Orthodox Church would know it.
The first clause though isn’t a bad idea. Take away, but salve that with a new concession.
Know exactly what you mean. The post-1900 forum people and especially the WWII people on this site can be so pedantic as to be insufferable. That's part of the reason why I opted for Writers Forum for my TL - I can just tell stories that way and be judged on the merits/weaknesses of the characters I've created without having to get bogged down in too much research.
This was several years back, but I remember reading a thread in the post-1900 forum. The intro was one of those ‘jump immediately into the action in the middle’ types. In it there was a German aircraft carrier in the mid-Atlantic in 1944. People immediately started screaming bloody murder, when they didn’t even know the POD for the thread yet; it could’ve been 1902 for all they knew. I’m 98% certain there never was another update for that TL.
Honestly, to me what seems to be the best idea if you even wish to continue it into the somewhat present is a bit of a crash course with a focus on the more rhomania centric events throughout the centuries.
I’m being really detailed now but that’s because I have several plot threads running. Once they play out I’m planning to pan out and do a broader and faster-paced look, with the occasional zoom-in on big events/processes.
I'm still pissed that the German Kaizer got off easy in his own insanity. He should have kept his full mental faculties to truly appreciate his fuck-up.
His mental problems are copied from OTL Charles VI of France, so he has lucid moments in between.
Back to the latest update:
I can’t help but think this is too smart by half. Ibrahim has blunted the power of the Rhoman state in the Levant and created a short term financial crisis but has also angered even more the Rhōmanían state; which I didn’t think was possible; and created a handy dandy legalistic cover that a state has power over religious institutions within their borders.
A precedent that he could come to regret if/when Rhomania retakes the Levant and occupies at a minimum Mesopotamia and likely parts of the Iranian Plateau. It makes me wonder if “the great crime” isn’t wholly against people but also against property. Imagine Rhōmanía has taken the Levant, Mesopotamia, Tehran, Qom and other parts of the highlands and Rhomania decides to liquidate every single mosque under their control as compensation for the lost revenues in the Levant.
At a time when Mosques are likely centres of learning, centres of administration, and centres of community having them stripped to the foundation and carted off would be devastating to the legitimacy of any Persian Shahanshah who let it happen and would be crushing to any state trying to re-establish authority. Coupled with the utterly devastating loss of history and culture could very well imprint itself in the Persian culture as a “Great Crime”.
It would also make a bit more sense when in the modern day Rhōmanía “acknowledges but does not apologize” for the crimes committed if those crimes are not wholesale genocide but instead population expulsions; which though little different than genocide are functionally different; coupled with mass liquidation of all Islamic artifacts.
I was actually picturing this as Ibrahim being a massive troll. “I can’t stop you from taking back this house, but that doesn’t mean I can’t back up the toilets and leave you with the mess.”
Besides, the Romans were probably going to loot the mosques and madrasas anyway because they have money. The best chance for Ibrahim to stop that happening is for the Romans to not get there in the first place, and for that he needs money. Hence the looting. If he does that and then fails, the Romans will do…what they would’ve done anyway. Furthermore, to do that would mean any new Persian ruler, for the sake of legitimacy, would have to attack Rhomania to avenge the national insult.
Furthermore, from Ibrahim’s perspective, he knows the Roman goal is to kill him and potentially smash his realm into pieces. So with nothing left to lose, why not do the most damage to the Romans as possible?
Speaking of the industrial age, if this timeline gets to the invention of tanks I will be sorely disappointed if the Orthodox world at least, and maybe everyone, doesn't call them cataphracts.
*whistles*
Well for some people those deep technical details are actually quite interesting. Like I actually really am interested in what the industrial revolution looks like ITTL, and what modern military doctrines end up looking like. The closest major power (and that's kind of straining the term TBH) to Rhomania in the World Wars is probably Italy, who could actually be surprisingly competent on the rare occasion when they didn't have poor leadership and/or supply issues.
*whistles*
But I totally get the desire to focus on people over nitty gritty details. Luckily I imagine you'll have plenty of people who DO understand those details willing to do that research for you.
Some technical details can be fun. There are two criteria for me to include them. One, they are important to the plot and thus justify the time and energy for research. Two, I find them fun and interesting enough to be willing to do the research anyway. They have to meet just one, but they have to meet at least one. Hence the example of ‘how many metric tons of coal does Rhomania produce in X’. It meets neither. ‘How has Roman military doctrine developed with the addition of ‘tanks’ meets criteria 2 at least, so it would be included. To give an example already in play ITTL, I don’t talk about music or sports because those subjects fail on both counts (except for some brief blurbs which required little time investment).
And since tanks=kataphraktoi and military doctrine was mentioned, one industrial-era idea I had was this. Tanks are invented and called something else. The Romans take the concept, build their own, but call them kataphraktoi. But because of that name and history behind it, the Romans immediately start thinking of tanks as the gasoline-powered version of heavy shock cavalry. So they envision ‘tank’ warfare as massed fists smashing through the enemy line, opening breaches to be exploited by more numerous but less protected units (motorized infantry?) and are the first to use ‘tanks’ in the field as more than ‘slightly-mobile infantry support pillboxes’.
Having read this a bit more carefully I have to ask... why any of the churches "happily accept gifts" from Ibrahim of all people, who just happens to be the chief enemy of the faith? NONE of the churches are independent here. Ethiopia, the Russian states and the Georgians are all close allies of Constantinople, who in the Georgian case also lost the Trans-Aras to Ibrahim's father. In the Russian and Georgian cases, the churches are also in direct communion with Constantinople. The Copts are a despotate and Inrahim just a few years before mutilated several thousand Coptic prisoners of war a clear and obvious atrocity against them. The Armenians the... katholikos is an imperial subject.
This is about on par with Adolf Hitler during WW2 trying to bribe Britain with offers of French and Polish loot and territory and about as likely to work. Or Kemal's attempts to set up his puppet "Turkish orthodox church" in the 1920s. His handovers would be rejected out of hand as direct affronts to the faith, any priest that got ideas of accepting against the church hierarchy's orders excommunicated and treated as a traitor and that's about it.
Could see the Catholics or some of them at least accepting, given the continuing bad blood. The Orthodox, Ethiopians and Copts shown here? Sorry but no way.
Short answer: Greed.
Long answer: Note that the Orthodox response to Armenians and Copts having services in the Holy Sepulcher was violence to the point of beating two people to death. Clearly the relations between the various churches on the ground in the Holy Land are not great. The Armenian, Coptic, and Ethiopian churches all consider the Orthodox to be heretics and the Orthodox respond in kind, even if their governments ignore that for geopolitical reasons. Religious clergy won’t so easily forget such things. A local abbot sees an opportunity to get more wealth and stick it to the heretics and grabs it, presenting the Coptic Patriarch or Armenian Katholikos with a fait accompli.
So from the ‘heretical’ churches’ POV they’re getting lots of loot taken from overbearing annoying heretics. If God chooses to work through an unbeliever, well it won’t be the first time. Even if the Romans force them to give it back later, that’s a few years’ revenue they got that they wouldn’t have otherwise. If the Romans push further than that, they risk backlash that could get nasty.
Furthermore, the church higher-ups that might be more politically minded, well, some of that new income is ending up in their coffers. In addition, the churches could leverage return of properties for concessions at the Holy Sepulcher and other sites significant to all Christian denominations. If the churches declined Ibrahim’s offer, the Orthodox aren’t going to give them service rights at the Holy Sepulcher out of gratitude; see their response to the Armenians.
With the Georgians, note that all the foundations they got were founded by Georgians and then lost to the Romans, with efforts to get them back from the Romans later being blocked. So from their POV, they’re just getting their own stuff back.
As for the Russians, well simple greed explains their actions. They’re being offered properties and have a big patron backing them up for any future battles regarding ownership.
Only the logical action if you are the Armenian katholikos or for that matter the archibshop of Kiev (is Russia under its own patriarchate? Probably not TTL as it became de facto autocephalous due to the fall of Constantinople and then proclaimed a patriarchate in 1589 only due to the combination of the patriarch being under Turkish control and broke at the time) it to accept the cost of Ibrahim extending his tender mercies to their holding in the Holy Land if the other option is both helping the enemy and alianating Constantinople on top of this.
Waiting for the excommunications of everyone who was stupid enough to accept. For a start.
The head of the Russian church is the Metropolitan of Kiev, no Russian patriarch. But in terms of wealth, he and the big Russian bishops are very richly endowed compared to many of their Roman counterparts, so they have a clout higher than would be suggested by their mere rank in the church hierarchy.
As for excommunication, that went out the window when the Armenian deacon and priest were murdered. (Ibrahim really lucked out here; coincidence it took so long for the Ottoman troops to intervene in the fight?) If the Katholikos excommunicated now, he’d be denounced as favoring heretics, who’d murdered clergy on the doorstep of the Holy Sepulcher, over the faithful themselves. Sounds like a good way to create a schism. Meanwhile the Copts and Ethiopians know that the same thing would’ve happened to them if they’d been first on the roster instead, so that doesn’t help for a conciliatory mood.
In addition, excommunication would be punishing clergy for political acts (endangering relations with Constantinople); accepting gifts from Muslim rulers has a long history. It’d be blatantly the state using church powers for its own ends, and any independently-minded cleric is not going to like that.
Georgians are just taking back what was rightfully theirs. The Russians here are being greedy, but they’re also strong enough to possibly get away with it.