No GNW (or “Peter goes South”)

2) if Russia doesn't do the stupid thing and get involved anyway, I'd say it's going to be hard to argue there will be a war at all. However the Prussian hunger isn't stilled. Maybe British money can trigger both German speaking nations to round two? This disappointment might be a Prussian motive:

I sincerely doubt it, otl Austria wanted to join second coalition only on condition that Russia joins, while Prussia refused to join at all, only joining in war of fourth coalition after Napoleon decided to create confederation of Rhine.
 
Last edited:
Russia has naught to gain from the Coalition, and much to gain in playing both sides for trade and concessions.

If Nappy can be diverted away from the Baltic and towards messing with the Ottomans or Austria, then Russia can extract more from Britain for aid, or intervene in the vacuum of the post-French period in the region.

It would be defense agreement and without Russia in war it's quite likely that France will gain dominance over Germany which also isn't in Russian interest as that means that Austria and Prussia will be forced to seek other avenues of expansion (namely second partition of Poland and Ottoman's which means problems for Russia), that would be even worse if their actions are supported by France.

Basically Russia has nothing to gain in the war, but it still has a lot to lose if France gets to powerful in central Europe, alliance aimed at defending existing balance of power would be sensible thing.
 
Interesting thoughts but aren’t we jumping instead of walking step by step? 😉

End of the war of the 1st coalition left France with control over the Netherlands, a big part of Italy and the right bank of the Rhine
At that point we have two options (without Russia):
1. Austria is not declaring a war. Which leaves in OTL list: Britain, Naples, Tuscany, Portugal, and the Ottomans (with Syria and Egypt). IMO, out of the list only Britain (because it risks nothing) and the “Ottomans+” (because they have no options) and perhaps Portugal are going to fight but in the worst case scenario Naples and Tuscany are not a military problem.
2. Austria is going to war (contrary to its OTL stance) and there is a complete list of the OTL Italian participants. Anyway, France has two armies in Italy: Army of Naples - 28,000 (or 34,000) and Army of Italy - 63,000 commanded by Moreau. Without Suvorov the Austrians had 55,000 commanded by Melas. How likely would be a series of the OTL victories, which cleared Italy of the French? IMO, the chance would be very slim, optimistically.

In both cases there is no loss of Italy and when certain general returns from Egypt there is no ecological niche for the “savior of France” and no place for the demagoguery about loss of the territories he conquered. Taking into an account that both Moreau and Melas would probably stick to the cordon strategy and that Moreau (IMO) was more talented and had more troops, it is reasonably to assume that the Austrians end up being pushed out of Venice or at least there is a stalemate but most probably Moreau is a hero and what’s the reason for Bonaparte’s return without an order?

I’d assume that the chances for OTL scenario are getting rather slim and there could be other candidates, anyway. Which means that the OTL issues like CS, conquest of Germany, etc. may not even exist.
 
Interesting thoughts but aren’t we jumping instead of walking step by step? 😉

End of the war of the 1st coalition left France with control over the Netherlands, a big part of Italy and the right bank of the Rhine
At that point we have two options (without Russia):
1. Austria is not declaring a war. Which leaves in OTL list: Britain, Naples, Tuscany, Portugal, and the Ottomans (with Syria and Egypt). IMO, out of the list only Britain (because it risks nothing) and the “Ottomans+” (because they have no options) and perhaps Portugal are going to fight but in the worst case scenario Naples and Tuscany are not a military problem.
2. Austria is going to war (contrary to its OTL stance) and there is a complete list of the OTL Italian participants. Anyway, France has two armies in Italy: Army of Naples - 28,000 (or 34,000) and Army of Italy - 63,000 commanded by Moreau. Without Suvorov the Austrians had 55,000 commanded by Melas. How likely would be a series of the OTL victories, which cleared Italy of the French? IMO, the chance would be very slim, optimistically.

In both cases there is no loss of Italy and when certain general returns from Egypt there is no ecological niche for the “savior of France” and no place for the demagoguery about loss of the territories he conquered. Taking into an account that both Moreau and Melas would probably stick to the cordon strategy and that Moreau (IMO) was more talented and had more troops, it is reasonably to assume that the Austrians end up being pushed out of Venice or at least there is a stalemate but most probably Moreau is a hero and what’s the reason for Bonaparte’s return without an order?

I’d assume that the chances for OTL scenario are getting rather slim and there could be other candidates, anyway. Which means that the OTL issues like CS, conquest of Germany, etc. may not even exist.

I would assume that first possibility is more probable, Austria wasn't in shape to take the fight to France, not even with British financial help.

I this case i assume there won't really be a coalition?
 
I am thinking and hemming & hawing about the too powerful France though. I can certainly see, especially since Russia has been widely successful militarily, that they would be relatively easier to convince then one would hope. But what would be a good incentive that Britian can offer that would really really convince them? Istanbul and Crete are still Ottoman, so that won't fly. So I'm struggling to see a potential gain. Maybe some of the colonies of NL in Asia?

Tldr; I can't see this Russia going to war "just" for putting France down, however the growth of France is concerning, so I can also see why doing nothing is not very appealing either.
 
however the growth of France is concerning, so I can also see why doing nothing is not very appealing either.

Technically growth of France is beneficial for Russia in this case as it keeps British, Austria and Prussia out of their backs, not to mention that France being seen as strongest continental power is nothing new .

For example it's far more useful for France to have it's current borders opposed to otl outcome of Prussia getting the Rhineland as that would make Prussia to powerful in relation to Sweden, same with the British, if French are kept down there won't be anyone to challenge them on the seas .

France is only a threat if it gets too powerful like in otl (unlikely to happen in this TL).
 
I think a strong France is fine for Russia so long as it does not get TOO strong. Such a France will keep the attention of Britain and keep that attention off of Russia.
 
At least in OTL Austria made Russian participation a pre-requisite. If Austria is out, then Naples and Tuscany are either out or their days as the independent states are numbered. Which leaves Britain, the Ottomans and Portugal (not sure how exactly it could get into the picture in a meaningful way). So there is some kind of a coalition and some military activities but nothing remotely close to the OTL European theater.

On a second thought, the Naples may still be in the picture: its army advanced to Rome and was beaten before it formally joined an alliance. So there can be Parthenopean Republic anyway and without Suvorov’s victories in Italy and Ushakov’s naval support of Ruffo it will probably stay.

In this scenario I can see, as a theoretical possibility, Russian purely naval involvement because Russia is not interested in the French strengthening in Levant: ITTL, unlike OTL, Russia conducts a noticeable trade there and France is a competitor of the kind. Actually, the nomenclatures of the imports into the region are seriously different but perhaps competition on the exported goods raises their price or there simply can be a fear that the French are going to establish the trade monopoly. Or there simply can be an appeal from the Ottomans for help: unlike Austria, they are an old friend and important trade partner and the Black Sea Fleet can get an useful experience from a military exercise in the Med, especially if the Brits are going to cover part of the cost.

Then the whole thing may led to creation of the Republic of Five Islands (as in OTL) but while the Russian-Ottoman cooperation is not a problem, one with the Brits is just unlikely as in OTL: Nelson remains the same prick as in a reality. So Russia is getting a Russian-Ottoman vassal state (of a very limited worth) and can brag about the victory at a very low cost.

Now, as far as strengthening of France is involved, I quite agree that within pre-Napoleonic limits it is of no danger to France and perhaps there is some advantage in having Prussia and Austria weakened: if anything, this removes their demands for the next Partition.

Which leaves the following issues:
1. Can/will France without Napoleon expand into Germany beyond the Rhine to a degree which will make this expansion a potential danger for Russia? I don’t think so. There could be bak and forth operations beyond the Rhine until everybody is getting tired.
2. Related to #1: will it get a stable and pragmatic government acceptable to the “royal Europe”? In the assessments of the contemporaries, including the Brits, a military junta would be acceptable with the expectation that its leaders are pragmatic people (would be the case with the expected triumvirate).
3. What will be place of general Bonaparte in alt-France?
(a) Will he be satisfied with a position of just one of the republican generals? I don’t think so and he has a powerful political backing.
(b) Will he be court-martialed and executed or sent to exile for abandoning his army? IMO, execution is unlikely but exile is realistic: after all, he did exile Moreau.
(c) How about he did not make it from Egypt? Look at the fate of general Dumas. Or his ship could be sunk by the Brits.
 
Well if you want for a more fun in future have Napoleon court martialled and exiled....... to Russia (seriously Napoleon in Russia is a promise of interesting times for everyone)
 
At least in OTL Austria made Russian participation a pre-requisite. If Austria is out, then Naples and Tuscany are either out or their days as the independent states are numbered. Which leaves Britain, the Ottomans and Portugal (not sure how exactly it could get into the picture in a meaningful way). So there is some kind of a coalition and some military activities but nothing remotely close to the OTL European theater.

On a second thought, the Naples may still be in the picture: its army advanced to Rome and was beaten before it formally joined an alliance. So there can be Parthenopean Republic anyway and without Suvorov’s victories in Italy and Ushakov’s naval support of Ruffo it will probably stay.

Yea i agree with that.
In this scenario I can see, as a theoretical possibility, Russian purely naval involvement because Russia is not interested in the French strengthening in Levant: ITTL, unlike OTL, Russia conducts a noticeable trade there and France is a competitor of the kind. Actually, the nomenclatures of the imports into the region are seriously different but perhaps competition on the exported goods raises their price or there simply can be a fear that the French are going to establish the trade monopoly. Or there simply can be an appeal from the Ottomans for help: unlike Austria, they are an old friend and important trade partner and the Black Sea Fleet can get an useful experience from a military exercise in the Med, especially if the Brits are going to cover part of the cost.

Yea, a short no risk war where France can't really reach them in order for Russia to protect it's trade interests and boost it's diplomatic standing and prestige seems like no brainer, i could see cause of the war being all things above, from trade interests to Ottoman appeal.

Then the whole thing may led to creation of the Republic of Five Islands (as in OTL)

You mean Republic of the Seven United Islands (Septinsular Republic) ?

It will be interesting for Russia to have a base in Med, this helping hand to the Ottoman's will probably earn Russian Black Sea fleet a right to conduct naval operations in Eastern Med .
 
Last edited:
Yea i agree with that.


Yea, a short no risk war where France can't really reach them in order for Russia to protect it's trade interests and boost it's diplomatic standing and prestige seems like no brainer, i could see cause of the war being all things above, from trade interests to Ottoman appeal.



You mean Republic of the Seven United Islands (Septinsular Republic) ?

Oops. Yes.
It will be interesting for Russia to have a base in Med, this helping hand to the Ottoman's will probably earn Russian Black Sea fleet a right to conduct naval operations in Eastern Med .
For a while I was considering Russian capture of Malta (without any Order-related implications): as a base on the Med it is probably more attractive than Corfu on the Ionic Sea. But, on a negative side, Corfu is better protected being near the Ottoman (Albanian) coast and, unlike Malta, will not generate any British hysteria.
 
Well if you want for a more fun in future have Napoleon court martialled and exiled....... to Russia (seriously Napoleon in Russia is a promise of interesting times for everyone)
An idea already had been used in at least one alt-history book but famous general Bonaparte entering the Russian service is an interesting twist. An obvious question is with whom he is going to fight? Well, there is one tempting option that I’m presently considering but, generally, ITTL the window of opportunity for the “interesting times” is rather limited due to the generally peaceful course. Thanks for the idea

Of course, a court-martial can exile him but it can’t exile into a specific country so going to Russia would be a matter of him negotiating admittance into the Russian service.
 
An idea already had been used in at least one alt-history book but famous general Bonaparte entering the Russian service is an interesting twist.
I wouldn't call Sverzhin's book solid alt history as far as PoDs develop - for example, Alexandre Dumas (a general, not his writer son) taking the place of OTL Napoleon as far as pan-European conquests go.
 
I wouldn't call Sverzhin's book solid alt history as far as PoDs develop - for example, Alexandre Dumas (a general, not his writer son) taking the place of OTL Napoleon as far as pan-European conquests go.

Pardon me, but the book both of you mention is Seyatel bur by Vladimir Sverzin ?

If yes do you know if there is an english translation (as my knowledge of Russian language is rather poor) of it?
 
I wouldn't call Sverzhin's book solid alt history as far as PoDs develop - for example, Alexandre Dumas (a general, not his writer son) taking the place of OTL Napoleon as far as pan-European conquests go.
Well, there is a fantasy element, the whole organization allowing travel in parallel universes. Other than that, it can be something of the alt-history with Russian field marshal Bonaparte and Basileus Dumas. There was, IIRC, one more (don’t remember the title) when Bonaparte helps to restore Louis XVII and Bernadotte ends up as French ambassador in Sweden. Don’t remember if it is the same or a different book: read the cycle many years ago.
 
Last edited:
Napoleon in the US would be interesting, as would a Napoleon serving as a mercenary/general in the Porte, Iran, India or further afield...
 
Coalitions
165. Coalitions


“There are but two powers in the world, the sword and the mind. In the long run, the sword is always beaten by the mind
Napoleon
The hedgehog, porcupine and cactus created a coalition of "untouchables" in wildlife.”
D. Semenihin
Treaties exist in order for the weaker one to fulfill them."
Karel Čapek
If the treaty is not supported by force, it worth nothing.”
N. Khruschev​

1797.

The War of the Coalition (so far, it was the only one so the number did not make sense) was over except that France and Britain still were at war. The French-Austrian Treaty of Campo Formio was seemingly satisfactory for both sides:
  • The treaty transferred tthe Austrian Netherland into French hands.
  • Territory of the Republic of Venice was divided between the two states: certain islands in the Mediterranean, including Corfu and other Venetian possessions in the Ionian Sea were turned over to the French, while the city of Venice with Terraferma (Venetian mainland), Venetian Istria, Venetian Dalmatia and the Bay of Kotor region were turned over to the Habsburg emperor.
  • Austria recognized the Cisalpine Republicand the newly created Ligurian Republic, formed of Genoese territories, as independent powers.
  • The states of the Kingdom of Italy formally ceased to owe fealty to the Holy Roman Emperor, finally ending the formal existence of that Kingdom, which, as a personal holding of the Emperor, had existed de jure but not de facto since at least the 14th century.
  • France got the border by the Rhine, the Nette and the Roer.
  • Free French navigation was guaranteed on the Rhine, the Meuse and the Moselle.
France also got Nice and Savoy from Piedmont.
1656720755374.png

However, there were numerous remaining issues:

  • Partition of Venice provided Austria with a foothold in Italy allowing a convenient starting point for the next war and at least the Cisalpine Republic did not have a direct connection with France.
  • Ferdinand of Naples refused to pay tribute to France.
  • In 1798 Republicans in the Swiss cantons, supported by the French army, overthrew the central government in Bern and established the Helvetic Republic.
  • The Ottomans were opposite to happy with having the French within spitting distance from their Balkan possessions.
  • Compensation of the German prices for the losses on the left bank of the Rhine and a general peace between France and the HRE was deferred to the Congress Rastatt which achieved only two important results during the first months of the congress: the official recognition of the loss of the entire left bank to France, and the recognition that any compensation plan should be based on the secularization of the ecclesiastical states of the Empire. No specifics could be agreed upon.
Although indecisive from a diplomatic point of view the Congress brought high society to the area of Baden and was responsible for resurgence of interest in the spa town of Baden Baden.

From October 1797 until March 1799 France and Austria, the signatories of the Treaty of Campo Formio, avoided armed conflict but remained suspicious of each other and several diplomatic incidents undermined the agreement including attack on the French embassy in Vienna after which the Ambassador (general Bernadotte) left Austria. The French demanded additional territory not mentioned in the Treaty. The Habsburgs were reluctant to hand over designated territories, much less additional ones.

Of course, all of the above were relatively minor issues which could be eventually resolved more or less peacefully but the French Republic had been governed by a bunch of the small-scale scumbags with two main goals in life, how to exploit the opportunities presented by their position and how to prevent the army from turning against them, and not being very good in either: none of them was smart enough to amass a really big fortune and having the troops undersupplied and underpaid surely was not a good idea in a long run. However, a fear of their own army forced the Directorate to keep it away and busy and this was just a ticking bomb.

On the opposite side, Austria was slowly recuperating from the recent war, the German princes were not too important and the same goes for the Italian rulers. The Brits were still at war but all their attempts to cause mischief on the continent failed. On the North the Baltic League was explicitly neutral and Russia even restored the diplomatic relations with France. To sum it up, it looked like there is going to be a peace for a while.
1656723710634.png


Unfortunately, the time of peace had been made even shorter by the excessively ambitious general with the Big Idea. After spectacular success in Italy general Bonaparte was not one to be ignored and he came with …er… “logical” plan on how to defeat the only remaining enemy, Britain. In early 1798, Bonaparte proposed a military expedition to seize Egypt. In a letter to the Directory, he suggested this would protect French trade interests, attack British commerce, and undermine Britain's access to Indiaand the East Indies, since Egypt was well-placed on the trade routes to these places.
1656723981953.jpeg

Bonaparte wished to establish a French presence in the Middle East, with the ultimate dream of linking with France's ally Tipu Sultan, ruler of Mysore in India.

On a map everything looked quite reasonable, especially taking into an account that the maps were of a relatively small size, and he even managed to convince Talleyrand who usually did not suffer from an excessive naïveté. Converted to the cause, Talleyrand reported to the Directorate: “Having occupied and fortified Egypt, we shall send force from Suez to the Sultanate of Mysore, to join the forces of Tipu Sultan and drive away the English”.

Being assaulted by the leading military and diplomatic figures, Directory agreed to the plan. Whatever doubts its members may have about plausibility of getting from Suez to Mysore [1] they kept them to themselves by two reasons: first, general Bonaparte tended to push through his ideas with a verbal barrage so intensive that it was easier to agree than to try to understand what he is talking about (besides heavy accent, he tended to bring as an argument various ancient gods, his luck, glory and, what’s most important, the looting opportunities; and in the last area he, so far, delivered handsomely); second, the most ambitious general was volunteering to go to the far end of a nowhere. The second consideration proved to be very important because when, during one more routine diplomatic crisis with Austria, the Directory recalled Bonaparte in case war broke out, in a stormy meeting with the Directory, Bonaparte threatened to dissolve them and director Reubell gave him traveling order and a pen saying "Sign there, general!" So off he sailed with 40,000, 10,000 sailors and a mighty naval squadron.

Of course, it would be unfair to declare that all following troubles had been caused by Bonaparte’s expedition. Driven by <whatever> the Swiss Republicans overthrew the cantonal government in Bern and declared République Hélvetique, (German: Helvetische Republik, Italian: Repubblica Elvetica).

Picture below shows a Swiss who wakes up from his sleep (the ancien régime) and is handed his weapons by Liberty. In the background, the rising sun and the Gallic rooster herald the new era.
1656727242246.jpeg

Another picture, “William Tell fights the revolution” (1798), by Dunker, praises the struggle of the Old Confederation against the Helvetic revolution supported by French invasion. It depicts the Swiss folk hero William Tell, carrying a shield with the Rütlischwur, and his son fighting the revolution, represented as a chimera wearing a phrygian cap.
1656727526323.jpeg

So at least it can be claimed that otherwise pointless mess had been beneficial for proliferation of the arts. 😂


After which the French Army of the Alps invaded , ostensibly to support the Swiss Republicans. The invasion proceeded largely peacefully since the Swiss people failed to respond to the calls of their politicians to take up arms. [2] The treaty of alliance of 19 August with France, which also reaffirmed the French annexation of the Prince-Bishopric of Basel and imposed French rights over the Upper Rhine and the Simplon Pass for evident strategic reasons towards Germany and Italy, also broke the tradition of neutrality established by the Confederation. Well, it also was considered by Austria as a potential problem.

1656728123312.png

In a meantime general Bonaparte with his army landed in Egypt and proceeded with demonstration of an obvious fact that the modern army had serious advantages over the ill-organized bands of the Eastern horsemen [3]. The first serious offset happened in August 1798 when the British squadron destroyed most of the French flotilla in a battle of the Nile.
1656728783071.jpeg

Unfortunately (for them), the victorious Brits suffered a heavy loss: their leader, Rear-Admiral Sir Horatio Nelson, got a mortal wound and died [4], just as the French commander, Vice-Admiral François-Paul Brueys d'Aigalliers. For all practical reasons the expedition was cut off from France with no realistic chance to return but this did not stop general Bonaparte who kept conquering Egypt and then invaded Syria.

The Ottomans were not watching the events idly and after received news of the French fleet's destruction at Aboukir, Sultan Selim III decided to wage war against France, and sent two armies: one to Egypt and one to Syria. He also made to alliance treaties.

One with Britain was an obvious and easy deal because Britain already was at war with France.

Another, with Russia, was more tricky to conclude because Russian interest in the ongoing events was limited. However, the Treaty of Campo Formio did change situation on the Balkans because the French, now positioned on the islands close to the Ottoman territories, had been secretely inciting the anti-Ottoman movements of the Greeks of the Ionic islands and Morea. The Russian Empire preferred strong Ottoman Empire capable of maintaining an order on the Eastern Med so that the trade would not be disturbed and a need to deal with the rebellions would be negatively impacting the Ottoman purchasing capacities.

OTOH, Emperor Paul did not have any intention to get Russia dragged into a major war far from its borders and without a realistic hope to get any serious tangible advantage out of it. So he was willing to commit a naval squadron for the joined operations on the Eastern Med/Ionic Sea and, if necessary, as far as Sicily to protect the Russian naval bases there.

The parties defined in the published articles of the treaty as a common goal the preservation of the integrity of their possessions and possessions of the Allies, ensuring security, tranquility and political balance between the powers, as well as countering the aggressive plans of France.

But the most significant obligations of the parties were contained in the secret articles of the treaty. One of them established that Russia had promised military assistance to Turkey in the fight against France - in particular, to provide 12 warships to help the ally, and the maintenance of the Russian squadron was entrusted to Turkey. According to another secret article, Russia for the first time received the official exclusive right to freely conduct the military fleet through the Straits - from the Black Sea to the Mediterranean and back, where, in particular, it was said that the Strait of Constantinople "opens to Russian vessels only in this case, the entrance to the Black Sea will be closed to all other nations without exception."

So this would be a coalition war if not a bizarre fact that while Britain and Russia had treaties with the Ottomans, they did not have any treaties with each other.

Russia. Paul assigned vice-admiral F.F.Ushakov [5] as a head of the expedition. On August 12, 1798, the squadron under the command of Ushakov consisting of 6 ships of the line, 7 frigates, 3 avisoes and landing troops (1700 marine grenades of the Black Sea Fleet Battalions and 35 midshipmen of the Nikolaev Naval School) left Sevastopol and headed for Istanbul. In Istanbul, Kadyr Bey's squadron consisting of 4 ships of the line, 6 frigates, 4 corvettes and 14 gunboats was transferred under Ushakov's command, after which the combined fleet went on a campaign.
1656737811579.jpeg


In 6 weeks, the Russian naval troops occupied the Ionian Islands: Kitira, Zakynthos, Kefalonia and Lefkada (French total losses amounted to 1,500), after which the fleet began an operation to seize the island of Corfu.
1656732259355.jpeg

Town Corfu was located on the east coast in the central part of the island between two fortresses:
  • "Old Fortress" ("Venetian" or Paleo Frurio), located at the eastern tip of the city, cut off from the city by an artificial moat created in natural runoff, with sea water below.
  • “New Fortress" ("coastal" or Neo Frurio) - northwest of the city, consisting of three separate fortifications connected by underground passages, extremely fortified and modernized by the French.
A high wall stretched from the new fortress to the old one along the very shore. The city itself was covered from the sea by an old fortress, from the land side - by an earthen rampart with bastions (forts of San Salvador and San Abraham, redoubt of San Rono (San Roco)). From the sea, the city covered the well-fortified island of Vido. In addition, two miles from the coast was the island of Lazaretto, which was also fortifies by the French.

In Corfu, the French had the following forces: 3,000 soldiers, 650 guns + 500 soldiers and 5 artillery batteries on the island of Vido. In the harbor there was a French squadron consisting of 2 ships of the line (74-gun "Genere" ("Generose") and the 54-gun "Leander"), 1 frigate (32-gun frigate "La Brune"), the bomber ship "La Freemer", a brig and four auxiliary vessels.

On October 24, 1798, a Russian-Turkish squadron consisting of 3 ships of the line, 3 frigates and a number of small ships began the blockade of Corfu. On October 31, the battleship Holy Trinity, 2 Turkish frigates and 1 Turkish corvette joined the squadron, and on November 9, the main forces of the united Russian-Turkish fleet under the command of Vice Admiral F. F. Ushakov. Soon they were joined by a detachment of ships of Captain 1st rank D. N. Senyavin (3 ships of the line and 3 frigates).

Waiting for arrival of the Ottoman troops the squadron started blockade of the island. In December, detachments of Rear Admiral Pustoshkin’s ships joined the squadron (74-gun ships of the line "St. Mikhail" and "Simeon and Anna") and Captain 2nd rank A. A. Sorokin (frigates "St. Michael" and "Our Lady of Kazan"). Thus, the Allied squadron consisted of 12 ships of the line, 11 frigates and many small vessels.

On the night of January 26, "Genere" (painting the sails black) together with the brig successfully broke out of the bay.

On February 10, the promised Turkish troops (about 4,250 Albanian troops) arrived in Corfu. They were augmented by 2,000 local Greeks unhappy with the French occupation.

At the military council on February 17, held on the flagship St. Paul, an operation plan was developed. It was decided by ship artillery to suppress coastal batteries and land troops on the island of Vido - the key to the defense of Corfu. The assault on Corfu began at 7 a.m. on February 18, 1799. As a result of four-hour shelling, all five coastal batteries of the island were suppressed. The ship of the line Leander and the frigate La Brune tried to support the island, but, having received damage, they were forced to withdraw under the protection of Corfu batteries. At 11 o'clock, 2,160 troops were landed on both sides on Vido. By 2:00 p.m. after a two-hour battle, the island had been taken. Of the 800 people defending the island, 200 were killed, 402 soldiers, 20 officers and the island's commandant, Brigadier General Pivron, were captured. About 150 people managed to swim to Corfu. Russian losses amounted to 31 people killed and 100 wounded. Turks and Albanians lost 180 people killed and wounded.
Russian batteries located on the captured island opened fire on the fortifications of the New and Old Fortresses. They were supported by batteries near the village of Manducchio and from the hill of St. Panteleimon, the ship of the line "Holy Trinity", the 46-gun frigate "Descent of the Holy Spirit", akat "Saint Irina", shebek "Macarius" and a Turkish ship standing near the southern part of the old citadel. The Albanians went to storm bastion St. Roca, but were repulsed. The repeated assault of the Russian-Turkish forces forced the French, riveting guns and blewing up gunpowder cellars, to retreat to the strengthening of St. El Salvador. But the Russians broke into the bastion on the shoulders of the retreating and after half an hour of fierce hand-to-hand combat also captured it. After a while, the last forward outpost of the New Fortress is the fortification of St. Abraham fell under the onslaught of stormers. An assault on the old and new fortresses was scheduled for February 19, but in the morning the French sent parliamentarians to discuss the surrender. After negotiations, on February 20, 1799, an honorary surrender was adopted. According to its terms, the French were allowed to leave the island with a promise not to participate in hostilities for 18 months.

2,931 people (including 4 generals) surrendered. The military trophies of the winners were: 114 mortars, 21 howitzers, 500 guns, 5,500 rifles, 37,394 bombs, 137,000 cores, etc. In the port of Corfu, the ship of the line Leander, the frigate Bruene, a bomber ship, 2 galleys, 4 semi-galleys, 3 merchant ships and several other ships were captured. Allied losses amounted to about 298 killed and wounded, including 130 Russians and 168 Turks and Albanians. Rather unique was the direct usage of the naval artillery against the land fortifications: a prevailing wisdom was that a major warship is too expensive for such a risky deployment.

For this assault, Paul I made Ushakov admiral and awarded diamond badges of the Order of St. Alexander Nevsky and the sultan with a , chelenk [6] the highest award of Turkey.

On the liberated islands, the Republic of Seven Islands was established under the temporary protectorate of Russia and Turkey, which for several years served as a support base for the Russian Mediterranean squadron. For the rest of the war it was mostly patrolling the Eastern Med. There were no joined operations with the Brits.

France. Military planners in Paris understood that the Upper Rhine Valley, the south-western German territories, and Switzerland were strategically important for the defence of the Republic. The Swiss passes commanded access to northern Italy; consequently, the army that held those passes could move troops to and from northern and southern theatres quickly. Toward this end, in early November 1798, Jourdan arrived in Hüningen to take command of the French forces there, the so-called Army of Observation because its function was to observe the security of the French border on the Rhine. There were also the Army of the Danube, and its two flanking armies, the Army of Helvetia and the Army of Mayence, or Mainz. All these armies needed supplies and manpower but the Directorate did not care: most resources were already directed to the Army in Northern Italy, and Army of Britain, and the Egyptian expedition. Even before war had been declared by anybody, these armies were ordered to move to the forward positions outside French territory.

Austria. Austrian State Chancellor Thugut did not want to go to war unless Russia would also enter the coalition. Emperor Paul rejected any coalition idea which would get Russia involved in the land operations but the French movement left Austria without options so it made alliance with Naples. Britain and Austria were not able to formalise an alliance due to the lack of an agreement on the loan convention that would cover Austria's outstanding debt to Britain from the previous war, let alone British subsidy to Austria for the upcoming war; they would end up resorting to ad hoccooperation without formal agreement.

Naples made alliance treaty with Britain so this “coalition” was looking like Ottoman-British-Russian situation so, strictly speaking, the coming war was a “War of 4 coalitions”.

Fighting in Europe started in the most bizarre way: the Neapolitan Queen Maria Carolina induced Ferdinand to go to war with France once more. The Neapolitan army had 70,000 men was hastily summoned under the command of the Austria general Karl Mack. On 29 November, this army entered Rome, which had been evacuated by the French, to restore Papal authority. However, after a sudden French counter-attack, his troops were forced to retreat and eventually routed. A contemporary satirist said of the king's conquest of Rome: "He came, he saw, he fled". The king hurried back to Naples. Although the lazzaroni (the lowest class of the people) were devoted to the Bourbon dynasty and ready to defend it, Ferdinand sailed to Sicily and established his court in Palermo. The French troops, accompanied by the local Republicans, entered Naples and Parthenopean Republic was proclaimed after 8,000 Neapolitans had been killed defending fortress of Castel Sant'Elmo.
1656736943875.png

________
[1] After all, perhaps in these exotic places the ships are just growing on the trees or maybe that water space could be just crossed on foot (didn’t Moses cross the sea somewhere in that area). Anyway, the details are not going to be their headache.
[2] Making cheese and cuckoo clocks was leaving little time for the political activities, which were left to the good for nothing nincompoops. So when the new republic was proclaimed most of the politicians from the previous assembly were re-elected.
[3] There was enough on this specific subject in the earlier chapters and events of the Egyptian Expedition are mostly irrelevant (except for those which aren’t).
[4] (a) I don’t like him and (b) don’t want him to mess the future developments. 😜 He was wounded at the Nile so let this be a mortal wound.
[5] Much earlier I already used, ahead of his time, Ushakov and his victories on the Black Sea so now this will be the real one in a real time with a (part of) real actions during the War of the Second Coalition. For those really concerned about the names, let’s assume that he is a son or a nephew of the first one. 😜
[6] Silver jewelry for a turban in the form of a sultan strewn with precious stones. It had the shape of a flower with petals, from which 13 rays departed.
 
Top