149. In Russia
“I once talked to you about the freedom of our peasants, and therefore tried to alleviate the situation of my peasants as much as possible, giving them more will. But experience has proved that where the landlord's power stops over them, the arbitrariness of the government begins, or, better to say, the arbitrariness of a petty official who, under the guise of service, allows himself to rob and corrupt them…The Landlords form a transitional power between the throne and the serfdom, and therefore it is beneficial for us to protect the latter from the predatory arbitrariness of provincial bureaucrats.”
Catherine II to Diderot
“The peasantry maintains all other parts of society and by its works deserves special respect...”
Paul I
“It is much better for it to happen from above than from below.”
Alexander II about abolishment of a serfdom
“I have only two types of the subjects: the loyal ones and disloyal ones.”
Nicholas I
1775. Moscow
Acquisition of the new territories brought an obvious question about their integration into the empire.
Szlachta. Preserving historic rights and liberties of the local nobility was not even considered seriously. Whatever szlachta of these territories may think about itself was quite irrelevant. Now they were subjects of the Emperor of Russia and the recent war demonstrated that as a military force they are pretty much worthless. So they had two options: either accept the Russian laws or emigrate.
Catholic Church was not specifically oppressed but its affairs had been put under control of the Synod’s Department of the non-Orthodox confessions. Existing schools and “academies” were allowed to function. However, the lands had been subjected to the same treatment as those of the Orthodox Church.
Serfs. A need to integrate the new territories provided an opening for a broader reform, implementation of which so far had been postponed. The first steps actually had been made after Peter’s accession to the throne:
The Jews did not receive too much of an administrative attention just because nobody was quite sure what, if anything, has to be done about them. So far those acquired during the LNW were paying taxes and not causing any noticeable problems and if they looked a little bit peculiar and had some religious disputes among themselves, it was their problem. [3]
Now the time was considered ripe for a sweeping reform. A need to establish a proper order on the new territories was a convenient excuse (and limiting rights of the local nobility also was useful) but in a reality there were 2 fundamental factors simplifying the process:
Of course, introduction of a fundamental change, even if it was seriously skewed in the favor of landowners, did not produce an uniform enthusiasm among that social group. Actually, it did not produce an uniform enthusiasm among the liberated peasants either: good or bad, a landlord owner used to have a certain responsibility for well-being of his/her serfs but now this part of a system was gone.
But there were no peasant uprisings on any noticeable scale and the noble revolt did not materialize either so probably with a passage of time the things will going to take care of themselves.
On a cheerful side
In 1776 [4] the exciting news came from the Ural region. A man named Maxim Stefanovich Kozhevnikov, of Beloyarsk, found a few green crystals in the roots of a tree on the bank of the Tokovaya River. He took the stones to Yekaterinburg to sell them, and a small sample was delivered to Yakov Kokovin, commander of the Yekaterinburg Imperial Lapidary Manufactory and the Gornoshitovsky Marble Factory. Kokovin believed that the stone was emerald. Immediately, on 21 January 1776, he traveled with the workers and necessary tools to the place indicated by Maxim Kozhevnikov on the Tokovaya River. Despite the snow and cold, he started prospecting and, on 23 January 1776, a mica vein was found. While following it, several crystals of good quality emerald were discovered.
Further events developed very rapidly. Soon after the extraction of the first emeralds, the best samples were sent to Yekaterinburg, where they were cut at the Yekaterinburg Imperial lapidary manufactory, and later presented to the vice-president of the Cabinet of His Imperial Majesty. Almost all known emerald deposits were discovered between 1776 and 1790: Troitsky Mine (now Pervomayskoye) in 1776; Mariinsky Mine (now Malyshevskoe) in 1777; Hitny Mine (now Red Army Mine) in 1790. For the discovery of eme-ralds, Maxim Kozhevnikov was awarded a cash prize of 200 rubles. Yakov Kokovin was awarded the Order of St. Vladimir of the 4th Degree, which gave the right of hereditary nobility.
From 1876 to 1780, Kokovin supervised the exploration and extraction of emeralds at the Sretenskoye Mine, where a unique 2226-gram emerald was found.
__________
[1] Not to be confused with the “state lands” where the peasants had extensive rights.
[2] 30 years ahead of the OTL schedule.
[3] In OTL the Russian merchants started complaining about their competition to Elizabeth and later CII also had to live up to her “more Russian than the Russians” image. IITL these complaints will produce little sympathy: the government is quite pragmatic and whoever is generating the state income is a good guy as long as he is a loyal subject. The losers has to learn how to compete because the foreign merchants are not going to be forgiving.
[4] In OTL in 1831.
“I once talked to you about the freedom of our peasants, and therefore tried to alleviate the situation of my peasants as much as possible, giving them more will. But experience has proved that where the landlord's power stops over them, the arbitrariness of the government begins, or, better to say, the arbitrariness of a petty official who, under the guise of service, allows himself to rob and corrupt them…The Landlords form a transitional power between the throne and the serfdom, and therefore it is beneficial for us to protect the latter from the predatory arbitrariness of provincial bureaucrats.”
Catherine II to Diderot
“The peasantry maintains all other parts of society and by its works deserves special respect...”
Paul I
“It is much better for it to happen from above than from below.”
Alexander II about abolishment of a serfdom
“I have only two types of the subjects: the loyal ones and disloyal ones.”
Nicholas I
Acquisition of the new territories brought an obvious question about their integration into the empire.
Szlachta. Preserving historic rights and liberties of the local nobility was not even considered seriously. Whatever szlachta of these territories may think about itself was quite irrelevant. Now they were subjects of the Emperor of Russia and the recent war demonstrated that as a military force they are pretty much worthless. So they had two options: either accept the Russian laws or emigrate.
- For those who decided to stay certain accommodations had been made so that their children would be qualified for the military and administrative service in the empire. An university had been open in Minsk and the military schools in Minsk and Mogilev. The adults could apply to the service just by passing an exam.
- Those who wanted to leave could sell their estates either to the private buyers or to the state.
Catholic Church was not specifically oppressed but its affairs had been put under control of the Synod’s Department of the non-Orthodox confessions. Existing schools and “academies” were allowed to function. However, the lands had been subjected to the same treatment as those of the Orthodox Church.
Serfs. A need to integrate the new territories provided an opening for a broader reform, implementation of which so far had been postponed. The first steps actually had been made after Peter’s accession to the throne:
- The serfs had been included in procedure of swearing the loyalty oath to the new sovereign, which underscored their status as subjects of the empire.
- On his own lands [1] he reduced peasant duties (in particular, there was a two-day corvee), allowed peasants to get engaged in any type of work during corvee-free time, issued loans to peasants, built new roads in villages, opened two free medical hospitals, built several free schools for peasant children (including disabled children), as well as several new churches. In the state like Russian Empire example set by the monarch was not, of course, a mandatory to copy but it could not be simply ignored, either. Especially by those close to the court.
- In 1767 [2] Peter issued “Manifesto On 3 Days Corvee Labor” which forbade the serf owners to force their serfs to work on Sundays and major religious holidays and limited a number of corvee labor days to 3 per week. Unlike the personal example, the Manifesto was a mandatory document.
- Decree on the release by landlords of their peasants to conclude conditions based on mutual consent. According to it the landlords received the right to liberate serfs (for ransom or some agreed upon duties) alone and by villages with the issuance of a land plot. This one proved to be not very effective because Russian nobility was rather reluctant to do such a thing. However, it established a legal base for the future reforms.
- Decree on Quitrent allowed serf owners to replace corvee with the cash payments while allowing serfs to start their own businesses, work for salaries outside the estates, etc. This was much more popular: getting cash always was a high priority for the Russian nobility. Now the burden of selling the agricultural products or getting cash by some other means had been shifting to the peasants. And one of the surest ways to get cash was to work in the growing industrial plants.
The Jews did not receive too much of an administrative attention just because nobody was quite sure what, if anything, has to be done about them. So far those acquired during the LNW were paying taxes and not causing any noticeable problems and if they looked a little bit peculiar and had some religious disputes among themselves, it was their problem. [3]
Now the time was considered ripe for a sweeping reform. A need to establish a proper order on the new territories was a convenient excuse (and limiting rights of the local nobility also was useful) but in a reality there were 2 fundamental factors simplifying the process:
- Due to the policies of preceding reign percentage of the serfs in an adult male population already fell between 40% and out of those an overwhelming majority belonged to the estates indebted to the State Bank. Which meant that potential opposition did not have a strong financial & economic base.
- At least equally important was the fact that, while the officers corps of the Russian army was almost completely noble (with the exception of few lowest rank officers), percentage of those from the estate-owning families was in the low single digits and the same applied to the civic administration. In other words, a potential opposition did not have a “tool” willing to support its demands.
Of course, introduction of a fundamental change, even if it was seriously skewed in the favor of landowners, did not produce an uniform enthusiasm among that social group. Actually, it did not produce an uniform enthusiasm among the liberated peasants either: good or bad, a landlord owner used to have a certain responsibility for well-being of his/her serfs but now this part of a system was gone.
But there were no peasant uprisings on any noticeable scale and the noble revolt did not materialize either so probably with a passage of time the things will going to take care of themselves.
On a cheerful side
In 1776 [4] the exciting news came from the Ural region. A man named Maxim Stefanovich Kozhevnikov, of Beloyarsk, found a few green crystals in the roots of a tree on the bank of the Tokovaya River. He took the stones to Yekaterinburg to sell them, and a small sample was delivered to Yakov Kokovin, commander of the Yekaterinburg Imperial Lapidary Manufactory and the Gornoshitovsky Marble Factory. Kokovin believed that the stone was emerald. Immediately, on 21 January 1776, he traveled with the workers and necessary tools to the place indicated by Maxim Kozhevnikov on the Tokovaya River. Despite the snow and cold, he started prospecting and, on 23 January 1776, a mica vein was found. While following it, several crystals of good quality emerald were discovered.
Further events developed very rapidly. Soon after the extraction of the first emeralds, the best samples were sent to Yekaterinburg, where they were cut at the Yekaterinburg Imperial lapidary manufactory, and later presented to the vice-president of the Cabinet of His Imperial Majesty. Almost all known emerald deposits were discovered between 1776 and 1790: Troitsky Mine (now Pervomayskoye) in 1776; Mariinsky Mine (now Malyshevskoe) in 1777; Hitny Mine (now Red Army Mine) in 1790. For the discovery of eme-ralds, Maxim Kozhevnikov was awarded a cash prize of 200 rubles. Yakov Kokovin was awarded the Order of St. Vladimir of the 4th Degree, which gave the right of hereditary nobility.
From 1876 to 1780, Kokovin supervised the exploration and extraction of emeralds at the Sretenskoye Mine, where a unique 2226-gram emerald was found.
__________
[1] Not to be confused with the “state lands” where the peasants had extensive rights.
[2] 30 years ahead of the OTL schedule.
[3] In OTL the Russian merchants started complaining about their competition to Elizabeth and later CII also had to live up to her “more Russian than the Russians” image. IITL these complaints will produce little sympathy: the government is quite pragmatic and whoever is generating the state income is a good guy as long as he is a loyal subject. The losers has to learn how to compete because the foreign merchants are not going to be forgiving.
[4] In OTL in 1831.