I want an Alliance with the British, post WW1 I'd transfer the alliance to the USA as soon as they could. That means uninterrupted trade, there is little that the others can offer Russia needs. So count me in the objections list.
Why should there be WWI at all? And, if anything, OTL WWI demonstrated that Britain and France had been terrible allies to the RE. So I’ll try to avoid the major OTL disaster (and you can curb your bloodthirstiness 😜).
Anyway, as an ally Britain can offer nothing that can’t be provided by the normal economic relations (tea, rubber (*), some shipbuilding) while creating a lot of the dangerous obligations. ITTL, in an absence of AH as an aggravating factor, Russia has no quarrels with Germany (except for the short term tariff issue) and, unless Britain manages to mess things on the Far East (which I’m trying to avoid), with Britain as well.
Why there is a need of alliance with the US, I can’t figure out. Alliance against whom? Two countries have very few mutual or seriously contradicting interests (except for the grain trade) and normal economic relations would suffice.
(*) I already mentioned that synthetic rubber will appear ahead of the schedule.
I’m tempted to go ahead of the schedule even if not on the same scale. After all, in OTL “all big guns” idea was around in 1902-03 (Cuniberti published his article in 1903) for the ships under 20,000 tons and the long-distance battle of the Yellow Sea had been fought by the ships mostly built in 1890s.In terms of Shipbuilding, I hope Russia can dither for a while until around OTL 1905 level of tech, then build oil fed 20,000 tonne Battleships and 15-17,000 tonne BCs. Not too many, but just enough.
Well, pretty much everybody got stuck with the old ships after Dreadnought had been built, C’est la vie.