I've been trying to find some roughly contemporary examples of a king/prince being captured in battle, thus far without much success. The WotAS had several occasions when kings were almost captured - Frederick at Baumgarten, George at Dettingen, and Carlos at Velletri - but these 18th century royals always seem to get lucky. The closest thing I can think of is the "capture" of the Saxon royal children in 1745, who were still in Dresden when it was occupied by the Prussians, but they weren't really prisoners and I rather doubt that their situation had any bearing on the peace negotiations.

I suspect the example that will be on most people's minds will be the capture of Francis I of France at the Battle of Pavia in 1525 and the humiliating (for France) Treaty of Madrid which followed. On the one hand, it's over 200 years in the past but on the other Pavia is only a short distance up the road from Piacenza. The outcome - holding him prisoner until a treaty imposing massive territorial concessions on France was agreed - may still be a desired end game for Austria.
 
Spain is now looking earnestly for peace, the Bourbons have lost their army in Italy pretty much in it's entirety and with their puppet-Kaiser dead and Spain no longer intent on carving out a kingdom of Lombardy for Don Felipe, France will have no war goals left apart from maybe a mostly unofficial attempt to grab a bit of the Austrian Netherlands. I can't see how this would not lead to peace within the coming year at the latest.

The main reason for the war to be prolonged is that it's hard for France to throw in the towel when Maurice is owning so hard up in the Netherlands. As they see it, the longer the war goes on, the harder Maurice will own, and the stronger their hand will be. They are constrained only by a) the possibility of a serious invasion of Provence, and more importantly b) the fact that their economy is in free-fall. And while Piacenza was a debacle, the whole Italian theater is rather small potatoes to France. Losing 20k soldiers seems like a lot until you realize that Maurice has nearly ten times that many up in the Netherlands.

Spain is the soft underbelly here - it's their prince who's in captivity, and Fernando has no interest whatsoever in sending another Spanish army to get butchered in Italy. But while Spain is indeed looking for peace, they have a bargaining chip as long as they still occupy Savoy, and Fernando won't make peace as long as he thinks he can get something for it.

Spain's "strategic plan" from here on out is thus to have all available forces sit on Savoy and defy any attempts to wrest it from them until they can cash it in at the peace conference. Aside from that, they're basically out of the war - unless Maria Theresa manages to expand the conflict by invading Naples.
 
Spain is the soft underbelly here - it's their prince who's in captivity, and Fernando has no interest whatsoever in sending another Spanish army to get butchered in Italy. But while Spain is indeed looking for peace, they have a bargaining chip as long as they still occupy Savoy, and Fernando won't make peace as long as he thinks he can get something for it.

The problem is that what they probably consider a decent consolation prize--Parma--is in Austrian hands, and Austria isn't going to swap it out for Sardinia getting Savoy back. Maybe the Austrian Netherlands, but that involves getting France to give them up, and while they were willing to IOTL, that might not be the case here.
 
Last edited:
Could Austria's A-team and the refocused British blockades and Genoa only fighting to the last Spaniards at Piacenza help Carlos Emmanuel push into Savoy regardless of Fernando wishing to keep it as a bargaining chip?
 
I suspect the example that will be on most people's minds will be the capture of Francis I of France at the Battle of Pavia in 1525 and the humiliating (for France) Treaty of Madrid which followed. On the one hand, it's over 200 years in the past but on the other Pavia is only a short distance up the road from Piacenza. The outcome - holding him prisoner until a treaty imposing massive territorial concessions on France was agreed - may still be a desired end game for Austria.

The problem here is that Felipe isn't Francois--he doesn't actually lead a country, he's essentially a vessel for Bourbon interests in the region. Thus, as opposed to Francois, he's worth, well, nothing as a hostage.
 
The problem here is that Felipe isn't Francois--he doesn't actually lead a country, he's essentially a vessel for Bourbon interests in the region. Thus, as opposed to Francois, he's worth, well, nothing as a hostage.

Well, if he's dead the Spanish can't claim Parma, right?
 
Don Felipe doesn’t actually have a claim to Parma. Elisabeth Farnese was the heiress of Parma and passed it to her eldest son Don Carlos, but Carlos exchanged it for Naples and Sicily in the 1738 Treaty of Vienna, renouncing any Bourbon claims to Parma in the process.

Elisabeth Farnese wanted to “establish” her sons Carlos and Felipe as sovereigns because she knew the crown of Spain would be inherited by Fernando, not her own sons. She’d prefer Felipe to have Parma because it’s her hometown and she’s still upset about Carlos having to give it up in 1738, but neither she nor Felipe have a recognized claim to it anymore. At this point, Louis and Fernando don’t really care where Felipe goes as long as he gets something.

Of course as we know, Fernando ended up dying without issue at the ripe old age of 45 and the Spanish throne went to Don Carlos anyway, so all of this ended up being rather pointless.

Could Austria's A-team and the refocused British blockades and Genoa only fighting to the last Spaniards at Piacenza help Carlos Emmanuel push into Savoy regardless of Fernando wishing to keep it as a bargaining chip?

They could, and IOTL that’s exactly what Carlo Emanuele wanted them to do. After the Bourbon collapse in Italy, the Austrians said “let’s conquer Naples,” the Sardinians said “let’s liberate Savoy,” and the British said “screw you both, we’re paying for this war and we say you’re invading Provence.” And so they went to Provence.
 
Is there a scenario where they do both (Naples first presumably) and kick the Bourbons out of Italy entirely? Or was Britain too troubled by the Netherlands. Would France only move troops down for Provence?
 
They could, and IOTL that’s exactly what Carlo Emanuele wanted them to do. After the Bourbon collapse in Italy, the Austrians said “let’s conquer Naples,” the Sardinians said “let’s liberate Savoy,” and the British said “screw you both, we’re paying for this war and we say you’re invading Provence.” And so they went to Provence.

Britain spent so much money subsidizing all of these continental wars. Makes me wonder if there's any easy POD that'd make Britain more isolationist so they could've saved all of that cash.
 
Is there a scenario where they do both (Naples first presumably) and kick the Bourbons out of Italy entirely? Or was Britain too troubled by the Netherlands. Would France only move troops down for Provence?

A total expulsion of the Bourbons from Italy was Carteret’s goal, and Britain had at least given some support to Lobkowitz’s attempt at Naples. But by 1746 the war has been going on for five ruinous years, all the belligerent powers are exhausted, and the French invasion of the Netherlands is an all-hands-on-deck strategic emergency for Britain. By this time Maurice had nearly finished up in Flanders and was actually encroaching on the territory of the United Provinces. What the British want now is a decisive blow against France that will give Britain an upper hand at the negotiating table and allow them to restore the situation in the Netherlands to the status quo ante bellum - and, ideally, allow them to keep Louisbourg as well. An invasion of Provence was not merely a means to divert French forces from the Netherlands, but also a chance to hurt France where they would really feel it by taking French land and key strategic targets (like Toulon). The British suspected that an invasion of Naples was unlikely to put the same sort of pressure on Versailles.

The British were also informed by historical perspective: They remembered that Marlborough’s siege of Toulon in 1707 fell apart precisely because the Austrians diverted 10,000 men to go seize Naples. They were anxious to not repeat the mistake, and thus insisted that the Austrians give the Provencal campaign their whole attention. Since their subsidies were the only thing keeping Vienna solvent, they were in a position to demand it.
 
Last edited:

Md139115

Banned
Britain spent so much money subsidizing all of these continental wars. Makes me wonder if there's any easy POD that'd make Britain more isolationist so they could've saved all of that cash.

Well, yes they could have. What you need to stop is the political consensus that no one power can be allowed to control a large portion of Western Europe - an eminently sensibile consensus that got proven right during the Napoleonic Wars.
 
Of course as we know, Fernando ended up dying without issue at the ripe old age of 45 and the Spanish throne went to Don Carlos anyway, so all of this ended up being rather pointless.

Might this not happen in this timeline? I mean, Barbara was sickly, but she was not totally infertile given how they had a stillborn prince. If they have a child, this might also strengthen their dynastic double marriage to the point that in the ATL seven-year war, Spain and Portugal come to a diplomatic solution to their problems?
 
Don Felipe doesn’t actually have a claim to Parma. Elisabeth Farnese was the heiress of Parma and passed it to her eldest son Don Carlos, but Carlos exchanged it for Naples and Sicily in the 1738 Treaty of Vienna, renouncing any Bourbon claims to Parma in the process.

The thing about claims renounced in treaties is that said renunciations were themselves frequently renounced when the renouncers found them inconvenient. Every Spanish Bourbon could look to the example of great-grandpa that more or less got them Spain, and move on from that.

Elisabeth Farnese wanted to “establish” her sons Carlos and Felipe as sovereigns because she knew the crown of Spain would be inherited by Fernando, not her own sons. She’d prefer Felipe to have Parma because it’s her hometown and she’s still upset about Carlos having to give it up in 1738, but neither she nor Felipe have a recognized claim to it anymore. At this point, Louis and Fernando don’t really care where Felipe goes as long as he gets something.

Of course as we know, Fernando ended up dying without issue at the ripe old age of 45 and the Spanish throne went to Don Carlos anyway, so all of this ended up being rather pointless.

I wouldn't call it pointless--her sons got the crowns she wanted, and her grandkids inherited them. The fact that Carlos got to be King of Spain on top of that is just gravy.

Might this not happen in this timeline? I mean, Barbara was sickly, but she was not totally infertile given how they had a stillborn prince. If they have a child, this might also strengthen their dynastic double marriage to the point that in the ATL seven-year war, Spain and Portugal come to a diplomatic solution to their problems?

The thing is Barbara's issues do seem to have been fairly deep-rooted, and not the sort of thing that could casually butterflied away. Though in the end, it's Carp's call.
 
Corsican Arms
Corsican Arms

jxFHdMX.png

Induction of new soldiers into the Vincenti Regiment, 1744


In late July, young man disembarked at Bastia from a Livornesi pinque along with an assortment of barrels and shipping crates. He was dressed in the crisp blue uniform of a Prussian second lieutenant, introduced himself as “Guillaume de la Marck,” and insisted that he had urgent business with “His Majesty, the King of Corsica.” He was directed to Count Marcantonio Giappiconi, then at Bastia with the garrison and his regulars-in-training. The count and the cadet enjoyed a brief chat, and then the young man laid down his pseudonym and reintroduced himself. Actually “de la Marck” (more properly von der Mark) was his mother’s name; his own name was Friedrich Wilhelm Franz Heinrich, Freiherr von Neuhoff zu Pungelscheid, and he was Theodore’s cousin.[A]

Friedrich Wilhelm was the only living son of Franz Bernhard, Theodore’s uncle, who had taken little Theodore and his infant sister under his own roof after the death of their father. Franz Bernhard had provided for Theodore’s education and was one of his two father figures early in life (the other being his stepfather Joseph Marneau, who would later fall out with Theodore and report him for theft). Franz Bernhard appears to have had his own children rather late in life, and Friedrich Wilhelm was only 11 years old when Theodore was crowned as King of Corsica. Nevertheless, the boy heard his father’s stories about his “royal cousin,” who still sent regular letters to Franz Bernhard at his estate in Pungelscheid and received regular mentions in the popular gazettes.

In 1741, as Europe was plunging into war, the sixteen year old Friedrich Wilhelm joined the Prussian Army. He was was accepted as a cadet in the Musketeer Regiment No. 9 of Major General Otto Friedrich von Leps, which was recruited from his home district of the Prussian Rhineland. His unit had been on garrison duty during the First Silesian War and saw no action, but in the Second Silesian War - now as an ensign, or fähnrich - he had taken part in the decisive battles against Saxony in 1745, and obtained his commission as a second lieutenant in late 1745 or early 1746. Yet although this was a rather promising start to a military career, Friedrich still recalled his father’s stories about Theodore. He had followed news of Theodore’s triumphant return from exile in England, and is known to have bought a copy of Lochner’s 1736 Das Alte und Neue Corsica, which described Theodore’s arrival and coronation as well as the general history of the island. In March of 1746, Friedrich took a leave of absence, traveled to Italy by way of Switzerland, purchased some crates of muskets and other supplies with his father’s money, and secured passage to Corsica.

Theodore heartily welcomed his young cousin at Corti and vowed to put him to use. Befitting his military experience, Theodore commissioned him as a captain and sent him back to Giappiconi to be put in command of a regular company.[1] It was not exactly a high posting compared to Drost and Rauschenburg, who were both lieutenant-generals, but a 21 year old general would not have been very credible. Moreover, generals were a dime a dozen in Corsica; Father Carlo Rostini not Theodore used high military ranks to flatter and win over his prominent subjects in the same way he used titles of nobility. Most had no “permanent” military command or standing troops save whatever local militia they might raise. Pungelscheid may have been merely a captain, but he was a regular captain with his own regular troops in the permanent military establishment.


OhzUsLs.png

Uniform of the Prussian Musketeer Regt. No. 9 in 1750


Pungelscheid, of course, did not transform the royalist army overnight. Giappiconi was not interested in an abrupt overhaul of his training regimen, and one imagines that the forty-seven year old general was not entirely pleased to have a twenty-one year old captain give him “advice” on the training and conduct of his troops. Nevertheless, Pungelscheid did convince Giappiconi to “Prussify” his training and drill regimen in various ways - the reputation of the Prussian army in 1746 was rather good, and it no doubt helped that the captain was the king’s cousin. In the main this amounted to a greater emphasis on marching and maneuvering in step, and Pungelscheid also introduced the new Prussian bayonet drill of 1740 which involved the soldiers holding their muskets against the hip at waist height.[2] He also petitioned Theodore for money to acquire iron ramrods instead of wooden ones, as the latter were prone to snapping when handled roughly in the heat of battle.

As the captain was settling in with his troops at Bastia, the first Corsican battalion was fighting in the Riviera campaign under the overall command of the formidable Karl Sigmund, Freiherr von Leutrum, a German-born officer in Savoyard service known affectionately by the Piedmontese as “Barôn Litrôn.” While King Carlo Emanuele had led the army approaching Piacenza in the east, Leutrum had been entrusted with pushing against the French rearguard forces along the Genoese frontier, and spent the summer personally riding back and forth from Novi to Saorgio, commanding multiple offensives at once and probing the Franco-Genoese defenders up and down the line. The breakthrough came in the far west, where the Sardinian forces at Saorgio, including the “Corsican Regiment,” attacked and outmaneuvered a French force at Sospel. The Sardinians then cut southeast and advanced down the Roya river valley to Ventimiglia, which surrendered after the Sardinians were joined by a squadron of the British Navy, and occupied San Remo on August 15th.

Although the Corsicans continued to suffer from a reputation of indiscipline, particularly when in camp, the Sardinians found them to be well suited for the mountain warfare of the Alpine front. Major Pietro Giovan Battaglini’s battalion had been among those which turned the flank of the French at Sospel by taking a narrow track over the mountains. The features that made the Riviera and the Alpine foothills so difficult for normal military maneuvers - rugged mountains, isolated valleys, and narrow trails - were business as usual in Corsica. Although the battalion had lost some men to desertion in Piedmont, morale after Sospel was high. But it remained to be seen how the unit would comport themselves once they were actually in Genoese territory, particularly given what had happened at the Corsican siege of Bastia. For many of the Corsican rank-and-file soldiers, the rebellion - now in its 17th year - was coterminous with their adult lives; being at war with the Genoese was all they had ever known.

As it turned out, there was not much to fear. Genoese claims that the Sardinians had unleashed a mob of Corsican “bandits” upon them appear to have been unfounded,[3] and the nickname which the unit acquired in Italy - il reggimento nero, “the black regiment” - appears to have been based on their uniforms rather than their conduct. Indeed, the Corsicans were surprised to find that the Sanremesi hated the Genoese almost as much as they did and greeted the Sardinian forces as liberators (although their ardor for the British, who had shelled their town twice, was presumably more muted). The Genoese Republic was a conglomeration of former city-states and principalities which had been acquired by the Genoa over the centuries - often by force - and not every one of these constituent parts loved Genoese dominion. In 1729, the same year the rebellion had broken out on Corsica, the Sanremesi had filed suit at the Imperial Aulic Council in Vienna (as Genoa was nominally an imperial vassal) claiming that the Republic’s authority over them was unlawful, but without success. A later (and possibly apocryphal) folk legend quotes Major Battaglini as telling the Sanremesi elders that “the Genoese do not heed lawsuits and treaties, but only muskets and cannon.”

After the fall of Piacenza and the swift approach of the imperial army, the demoralized Genoese government quickly abandoned any hope of resistance and signed an armistice with Feldmarshall Josef Wenzel, Fürst von Liechtenstein. The marshal assured them that they would be treated with leniency, and that coming to terms with Austria would be preferable to being left at the mercy of the Sardinians. Carlo Emanuele, however, was not bound by this armistice and had no intention of observing it. Although the allied cause probably would have been best served by a close pursuit of the remaining French forces as they retreated west, Carlo Emanuele instead launched Leutrum’s army in a race eastwards along the Ligurian coast in an attempt to occupy as much Genoese territory as possible before the Austrians could reach it. Such was the state of trust and cooperation between Turin and Vienna.

The post-armistice Genoese army existed in a strange limbo. The army was formally declared to be prisoners of war, but they were not actually imprisoned or even disarmed. Only the expeditionary force at Piacenza and the garrison of the fortress of Gavi (which had surrendered before the armistice) were actually interned, and most of them subsequently died from hunger and disease in the atrocious conditions of their captivity. Elsewhere the Genoese battalions continued to hold their posts, either at their barracks in Genoa or in the Republic’s various fortresses, but their numbers were fearfully reduced by desertion. The Austrians actively solicited the demoralized Genoese soldiers to join them, offering a release from their “captivity” and steady pay that the indebted Republic had trouble providing (in part because of the end of the Spanish subsidy and the indemnity which the Austrians levied upon the supine republic). Most of Genoa’s foreign regiments - the Germans, Swiss, and Grisons - virtually evaporated, with even their senior officers jumping ship (and sometimes even encouraging their soldiers to join them). Turnabout, it may be argued, was fair play; in years past, the Genoese had taken to replenishing the numbers of these regiments with Austrian deserters.

And then there were the Corsicans. The number of Corsican regiments in the Genoese army had been gradually declining since the outbreak of the rebellion, and by 1745 there were only two. The quality had also gone downhill. While some were micheletti driven into exile by the rebels, generally considered reliable, many were poor Corsicans put into a desperate position by the privation of the long rebellion who saw an army enlistment bonus as their only way out. The oldest and most reliable of the Corsican battalions, the 1st battalion of the Giacomone regiment, was captured at Piacenza. The others, the 2nd Giacomone battalion and the single battalion of the Vincenti regiment, had been relegated to garrison duties throughout Liguria. In particular, most of the Vincenti regiment had been assigned to the western Ligurian garrisons under the command of Major-General Escher, who was now conducting a fighting retreat towards Finale together with several “lost” battalions of the French army.

As this retreat was underway, two of the Vincenti regiment’s captains - Giuseppe Antonio Lepidi and Domenico Maria Vincenti (none other than the son of the regimental colonel) - decided that this was an opportune moment to desert. It seems unlikely that their disloyalty was the result of a belated conversion to Corsican nationalism. Vincenti’s motives are unclear; he belonged to a family of Venzolasca with a proud history of Genoese military service. Lepidi’s motives can be more easily guessed, as he had been in trouble with his superiors over accusations of misusing army funds, and had retained his rank (for the moment) only because the Genoese were desperate for officers. After making contact with the Sardinians through a certain Ensign Colonna, the captains agreed to defect and surrender their companies in exchange for Sardinian commissions.[B] On August 27th, a Sardinian army detachment including Battaglini’s Corsicans “attacked” a portion of the Genoese line manned by the Vincenti battalion, only for the defenders to immediately throw down their weapons in a pre-arranged surrender. The Sardinians moved quickly to exploit this gap and the defenders were routed, falling back to Savona and its formidable Priamar Fortress, which would remain under siege for months. This betrayal so unnerved Escher that he excluded the rest of his Corsican troops from the fortress garrison, forcing them to surrender to the Sardinians after failing to escape eastwards.


ApTlUG2.png

Priamar Fortress, Savona


The ripple effect spread still further to Genoa, where the senators - fearing more such planned betrayals - dissolved the Vincenti regiment altogether and removed the Corsican Lieutenant-Colonel Paolo Francesco Petralba from command of the fortress of Sarzanello in the east. This left only the significantly under-strength 2nd Giacomone battalion in Genoa itself, and seeing no ready means to replenish it, this too was disbanded several weeks later. By the end of October, although individual Corsicans continued to serve in various “Ligurian” regiments (mostly soldiers from the former 2nd Giacomone), there were no longer any active Corsican national units in the Genoese Army. Overall, nearly 250 Corsicans in Genoese service were adopted into the (Royal) Corsican Regiment, the majority into two new supernumerary companies under Lepidi and Vincenti. Although the quality of these new recruits was mediocre and the desertion rates of the two new companies were the highest in the battalion, Battaglini was still able to boast in the autumn of 1746 that his battalion had actually gained men over the course of its service in Italy. In contrast, the Genoese forces had dwindled dramatically from defeat, disease, desertion, and defection. In July of 1746 the Genoese army, at least on paper, had over 12,000 men; four months later, the army commissioners reported that the entire regular army had barely 4,000 soldiers fit for service.

Back on Corsica, Genoa’s surrender and occupation was received with delight by Theodore and his cabinet, but they soon realized that it was not necessarily an unambiguous victory for their cause. Genoa’s armistice was only with the Austrians, and it said nothing about evacuating or disarming their overseas garrisons at Bonifacio and Capraia. As with the Genoese garrisons in Liguria, they were to remain in place. Genoa’s withdrawal from the war also threatened the resumption of Genoese shipping to these beleaguered garrisons, for now that the Republic had dropped out of the war there was no longer any need for a British blockade. For the moment, however, the blockade continued - not out of any sympathy for the Corsicans, but because of the fury of Britain’s minister to Turin Arthur Villettes, who was so incensed by Austria’s “separate peace” with Genoa that he demanded that Vice-Admiral Henry Medley continue the blockade as a sort of diplomatic protest. It was not until early November that Medley received orders from Secretary Thomas Pelham-Holles, Duke of Newcastle telling him to desist immediately and divert all available forces to the planned invasion of Provence.

In the meantime, Theodore focused his diplomatic efforts on Austria, as the Austrians now held the whip hand in Genoa. His route to Vienna ran through Tuscany; in particular he had the friendly ear of Emmanuel François, Comte de Richecourt, who sat on the Tuscan Council of Regency, as well as James Mills, an English-born former Austrian colonel living in Pistoia who still had friends in Vienna.[4] His overtures were received favorably because although she knew nothing of Corsica, Empress-Queen Maria Theresa despised the Genoese. She credited them with opening the gates of Italy to her enemies (ignoring the fact that by offering Finale to Carlo Emanuele she had arguably betrayed them first) and was absolutely pitiless towards the current plight of the Republic. It was probably for the best that Austria was represented there by the rather more restrained General Ludwig Ferdinand, Graf von Schulenburg. But her feelings towards the Sardinians were little better. Trust between Turin and Vienna was at a nadir, with only the British keeping the tenuous alliance together.

Theodore’s appeals, conveyed through Richecourt’s correspondence, played on these prejudices. The Empress, Theodore noted gratefully, had already voiced her support for the “liberty” of the Corsicans, but Carlo Emanuele had done that much and more, sending money into Corsica and raising a regiment of Corsican expatriates (that is, Theodore’s regiment) with the obvious intent of advancing his own agenda in Corsica. Theodore suggested that imperial recognition of his Corsican state - and not merely a statement in support of the abstract “liberty” of its people - would win the eternal admiration of both himself and the Corsicans while also frustrating the Genoese, the Sardinians, and even the French.[5] A pro-Austrian Corsica would provide Austria with much better harbors than Livorno, useful if the Austrians were to attempt to reassert themselves in the Mediterranean, as well as denying these bases to France and Genoa. He did not fail to mention that Bonifacio had a substantial cache of impounded Spanish artillery, badly needed by the forces of General Maximilian Ulysses, Graf von Browne which were now preparing to invade Provence. Critically, however, he asked for nothing in return save recognition - no money, no troops, no supplies. However meager his contribution to the war might be, he was offering it for no more than a scrap of paper - and, he added, the opportunity to serve the rightful emperor and his just and benevolent empress.

It was certainly a bold strategy. Theodore obliquely implied that imperial suzerainty would be welcomed by the grateful Corsicans, but he made it quite clear that what he was asking was the recognition of the Kingdom of Corsica as a state, with himself and his naziunale government at its head. This was not quite the same as claiming to be king; he might, after all, rule the Kingdom as a viceroy or regent, and thus the possibility was left open that Corsica’s king might yet be Franz Stefan, ruling by proxy in the same way that he ruled Tuscany. But it was nevertheless a recognition of independence and sovereignty, provided the Empress-Queen was willing to oblige him.

The Corsicans had yet one more iron in the fire. While young Pungelscheid was pleased with his new commission and hard at work training the infantry in Bastia, he shared the desire common to many young officers of attaining glory in combat, this time as a captain leading his own men rather than a mere ensign. Theodore would not send him to the continent, lest his cousin be thrown carelessly into the bloody fray by some callous Sardinian general. Yet there were other targets which seemed tempting now that the Genoese were vulnerable, and thus Giappiconi and Pungelscheid began laying plans for an assault on the isle of Capraia.


Footnotes
[1] Friedrich Wilhelm appears to have been merely “on leave” from the Prussian army at the time, which presumably did not permit him to take a commission with a foreign power. But nobody in Berlin seems to have noticed at the time, and Friedrich would never return to Prussia to attempt to regain his old lieutenancy. Whether he ever formally resigned from the Prussian Army is unclear; if not, he may qualify as the most famous Prussian deserter.
[2] The old drill, derived from the use of pikes, involved a soldier holding the musket out in front of himself at shoulder height with his right palm against the butt. This was useful enough for presenting a wall of points to receive a charge or force back an enemy, but it was awkward for real hand-to-hand combat. The Prussian waist-high method allowed easier handling of the weapon, a more effective thrust, and in general promoted a more offensively-minded use of the bayonet. This method eventually became universal. Some sources argue that the Prussian drill at this time was not actually waist-height but somewhat higher, still held against the soldier’s side but just under the breast. Either way, in this matter the Corsican Army was rather ahead of the curve; the army of Great Britain did not officially adopt a Prussian-style bayonet drill until the 1760s.
[3] This was rather rich coming from the Genoese, who had unleashed an actual regiment of bandits upon the Corsicans in 1736 whose soldiers were literally pulled from the Republic’s jails and offered amnesty for service.
[4] Mills may have liked Theodore because he was something of a visionary adventurer himself. He had served with the East India Company forces in Bengal, and wrote a curious memo to the British government explaining how Britain might conquer and rule all of India.
[5] In light of the fall of Calvi, King Louis had affirmed his continuing support for the Republic by declaring himself “in favor of the Corsicans faithful to the Republic of Genoa, and against those who seek to evade her domination.”

Timeline Notes
[A] Finally, we meet our last royal cousin. I don't know that much about Friedrich Wilhelm - he was indeed a junior officer in the Infantry Regiment No. 9, although the details of his military career are just my guesses based on his age and the actual history of the 9th Regiment during the WotAS. After that, however, he becomes a mystery - I don't even know his death date, or whether he attained any higher rank than lieutenant. The dearth of information and the fact that he had no known wife or children suggests he may have been killed in the war or died of other causes shortly thereafter, but I don't actually know that. I figured we could use a new royal cousin in the mix - and a little Prussian martinet, to boot - so here you go.
[B] Lepidi and Vincenti did indeed desert from the Genoese army in 1746. I’m not sure what happened to Vincenti, but Lepidi subsequently became a captain in Sardinia’s Corsican regiment - that is, Rivarola’s regiment - and was part of the attempted invasion of Corsica. He may be the same “Captain Lepidi” who, according to a British newspaper, made some statements “injurious to the Honor of the Daughters of Count Rivarola” and was shot dead by Rivarola’s men. Gosh, I wonder why that expedition went so poorly?
 
[4] Mills may have liked Theodore because he was something of a visionary adventurer himself. He had served with the East India Company forces in Bengal, and wrote a curious memo to the British government explaining how Britain might conquer and rule all of India.
Do you have a link to a page on this guy by chance? (Nothing on him on Wikipedia, it seems.)​
 
Do you have a link to a page on this guy by chance? (Nothing on him on Wikipedia, it seems.)​

I have very little. Mills (or "Mill") is mentioned in Glay and Gasper (two biographies of Neuhoff), and is apparently only known from correspondence (including that of Horace Mann, the British resident in Florence). He's presumably not famous enough for Wikipedia, although he does have an article in the (not publicly available) Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, where he is listed as a "writer on India." Sources seem to disagree on whether his plan for the conquest of India was submitted to the British or the Austrian government, although the notion that the Austrians might conquer India (as the Oxford biography claims) with their complete lack of a navy seems rather incredible to me, so I've assumed the former. He was considered in 1747 as the prospective leader for an Austrian-backed attempt at gaining control of Corsica in which Neuhoff was cooperating, but it never got off the ground, and the war ended not long thereafter.

How long has it been now since Genoan soldiers in Corsica have been paid?

Probably over a year in Bonifacio. Capraia is likely to be better as they're closer and easier to access from Genoa. Fortunately, both garrisons are so isolated that desertion is rather difficult.
 
Last edited:
I have to say, it's so rewarding to see the corsicans on the brink of victory like this after 67 pages of struggle and defeat. I think because of how difficult it was, this feels all the sweeter.
 
I do wonder/hope that Sardinia can do better in TTL (Venice as well... *quietly hides notes on a Morean War Timeline). Full annexation of Genoa is probably not in the cards, but they could end up with part of Genoa's coast potentially, and if either France or (more likely) Austria collapse they might get opportunities in Provence or Milan...
 
Top