The territory occupied by Joseph in 1777 (IOTL), based on a treaty signed with Charles Theodore, is said to have consisted of Lower Bavaria and Mindelheim. What exactly was meant by "Lower Bavaria" in this period is not entirely clear to me; certainly it does not align perfectly with the modern province of Niederbayern. Then again, it may not have been altogether clear to people in the 1770s either, as the Habsburg claim was apparently based on a grant from Emperor Sigismund at a time when Bavaria was a divided state.

In 1425 the Dukes of Bavaria-Straubing, one of the divisions of Wittelsbach Bavaria, died out in the male line. The Straubing lands in Bavaria (the house also controlled lands in Holland, which passed to Burgundy) were disputed between the other Wittelsbach dukes of Landshut, Ingolstadt, and Munich. Albrecht V of Austria also raised a claim, presumably because his mother was Duchess Johanna Sophie of Bavaria-Straubing. Ultimately the conflict was settled by the intervention of not-yet-emperor Sigismund in the "Pressburg Arbitration Award" of 1429, which partitioned the Straubing lands between the other three Wittelsbach dukes. Although Albrecht was Sigismund's son-in-law, he received nothing from the award because - as Sigismund pointed out - the Bavarian house laws stated that inheritance could not pass via the female line, but apparently it was alleged (I do not know the source for this) that Sigismund had offered Albrecht a consolation prize that if the Bavarian Wittelsbachs died out (all three of them, I presume?) the Habsburgs would inherit the territory.

Whether this grant is supposed to have meant merely the Straubing lands (very roughly equivalent to the districts VIII and IX on the map that Iserlohn posted, but far from an exact match), or the entirety of Lower Bavaria (which in the 15th century comprised both Bavaria-Straubing and Bavaria-Landshut, very roughly equal to regions VIII, IX, X, and XI on that map), or all of Wittelsbach Bavaria is unclear to me. Politically, however, it doesn't really matter much; Joseph's objectives are based less on the technicalities of some dubious 15th century grant than on what he can squeeze Charles Theodore into accepting.
 
Last edited:
ITYM Hither Austria...

View attachment 907828
Was the Netherlands really that lucrative? Because adding Bavaria to the Habsburg Realm provides a land bridge to Hither Austria, which they might appreciate. (And that in turn could lead to the acquisition of the SW corner Germany when mediatization comes.)
The land was called "Vorderösterreich" or "Die Vorlande", neither of which were widely traduced as "Hither Austria", since "hither" was and is an adverb of ablative connotation, while "vor" and "vorder" were more akin to a locative sense.
Hither means "to this place"
Vor
means "in front of X"
Vorder
means "front, forward"
You can see here how "further", with the sense of "more distant" came to be the translation.
Now the German names did appear in the 14th century I believe, so not exactly prime time for English to directly translate stuff from German about some small geopolitical development deep in the HRE, and it is possible that Italian or Latin served as an intermediary, possibly even French or Occitan, but we would have traces of such successive translations in the English form, that do not appear here (that is most of these languages used terms like "Anterior Austria").

Any source in English naming these lands "Hither Austria" just made a translation error, or perhaps translated from a German "her", "hierher" or "hierhin", who do equate to English "hither".
 
The land was called "Vorderösterreich" or "Die Vorlande", neither of which were widely traduced as "Hither Austria", since "hither" was and is an adverb of ablative connotation, while "vor" and "vorder" were more akin to a locative sense.
Hither means "to this place"
Vor
means "in front of X"
Vorder
means "front, forward"
You can see here how "further", with the sense of "more distant" came to be the translation.
Now the German names did appear in the 14th century I believe, so not exactly prime time for English to directly translate stuff from German about some small geopolitical development deep in the HRE, and it is possible that Italian or Latin served as an intermediary, possibly even French or Occitan, but we would have traces of such successive translations in the English form, that do not appear here (that is most of these languages used terms like "Anterior Austria").

Any source in English naming these lands "Hither Austria" just made a translation error, or perhaps translated from a German "her", "hierher" or "hierhin", who do equate to English "hither".
Indeed its Further Austria on Wikipedia.
 
I will say, Austria is by no means guaranteed to lose here.

They can replace their losses with somewhat more ease than their opponents (bar Russia) can. Russia is the deciding factor, imo.
 
I will say, Austria is by no means guaranteed to lose here.

All wars are dependent on political will, but this one especially so. Spending even more money to fund a war against Austria just a few years after the end of the American War is not universally popular in Britain; for now, outrage over Joseph's high-handed acts and vague concerns about the balance of power are driving policy, but at some point Parliament is going to start seriously questioning why they're paying for Germans to kill other Germans over a cause that appears to be more in the interest of Hanover than England. Pyotr is involved to shore up his alliance with Berlin and to get British subsidies, but he's not throwing his whole army into this. War with Austria (a traditional ally against the Ottomans) is not very popular at the Russian court and if the British subsidies dry up, so will the emperor's interest. That leaves Saxony and Brandenburg, who can't even get along when Britain is paying them to cooperate. If Britain and Russia were to pull out, the princes would have no chance, and it would be a race between Dresden and Berlin to see who could sue for peace with Joseph first.

Austria has considerable advantages here, both in manpower and political commitment. Their limiting factor is money. Frederick the Great once remarked that only Britain and France really counted as "great powers" in Europe, because they were the only states that could afford to subsidize others to fight for them, but by the 1780s France can't play that role anymore. Austria is in somewhat better shape financially than IOTL, because the "Prussian War" was shorter than OTL's SYW and Austria gets tax receipts from Silesia again, but they are fully reliant on their own resources. One campaign season is no problem, but if Joseph has to start paying for hundreds of thousands of active troops over successive campaigns, he's going to be in a lot of trouble.

Thus, this war may come down to which is exhausted first - London's patience or Vienna's treasury. Some extraordinary military success could also force one side or the other to throw in the towel early, but this might be a longshot given that the leadership of both sides is composed of geriatrics of varying degrees of competence. Prince Heinrich was a talented general, but even in his prime he was cautious and deliberate. Vienna could bring Laudon out of retirement, but he's nearly 70. The fact that there's been no war in central Europe for a quarter-century really shows in the lack of officers under 60 with formation-level (brigade/division/corps) command experience. (Russia has some - they've fought Denmark and the Ottomans in this time frame - but so far they're in a supporting role.)
 
Last edited:
Ironically those same factors might result in delaying the active resolution of the crisis, via like literally every summer of campaigning being wound down in the expectation of the flurry of diplomatic intrigue into the winter.

Like fundamentally, all the different Germanies are still part of the post-Westphalian structure of the Empire, and the division between its constitutional order and the Hapsburg family that wraps itself around that constitutional order even as it is build out from them is in many ways, a symbiosis. So really it comes down to either you do get something if a diplomatic resolution, or you get a significant step towards the death of the Empire much as the OTL divorce of Austria.
 
François Sébastien Charles Joseph de Croix, Count of Clerfayt should be around to take command (b. 1733), Wilhelm von Wartensleben should have joined the Habsburgs in TTL and could be the right rank to lead a part of the imperial army, while Friedrich Josias von Sachsen-Coburg-Saalfeld was born around 1737, he might still be around to serve Joseph. Dagobert Sigismund, Count von Wurmser should be a major general in the Habsburg army, and in OTL he distinguished himself during the Bavarian succession war, becoming a field marshal and might be in the running to replace Lacy.
 
One thing for Austria is that symbolically worst case it could badly damage their position as Emperors if they are successfully defeated by basically all their subjects. Into the early 1700s it was a real thing that was a huge source of Austrian manpower. Maria Theresa’s father and the War of the Austrian Succession basically ended it as a major source of manpower and created a near-peer in its neighborhood. Here it succeeded in cutting Prussia down to size so more potential to dominate a fairly autonomous but real structure. One challenge of being allied with France is it makes it much harder to keep the team together. Austria at this point has no real foreign threat and the German states don't either. So when Austria does a power grab...
 
Like in a lot of ways 1663-1714 was the peak of the Holy Roman Empire as an actor. Before than for a long time the Emperor had to rely almost soley on his own power and same after it. But for a glorious half century, fractiously but with few defectors, Prussians, Saxons, Bavarians, Austrians were fighting together against the great foes of France and Ottoman. Close to half the Habsburg manpower during this period was *not* from their lands. 1740 was result of Austria looking pathetically weak and temptation to pile was too strong. But after that until French Revolution there was not great external threat. And that time the response was much worse. I wonder what would have happened if Prussia was 1/3rd the size, so instead of being an independent, mostly aloof, power, it could be pressured to be a team player. Because last time Austria was clearly the leader. But Prussia was close enough to Austria in power to make its incentives very questionable in terms of Austrian performance in fighting France before 1805 when things started seeming rather scary. Which coincidentally is when it started mobilizing...
 
So after a couple months of intermittent reading, I’ve finally caught up to the end of this timeline, and all I can say is wow. Like others have said, this is the most detailed timeline I’ve ever read, but the narrow scope allows these tiny details to be interesting (I remember thinking “oh no!” when Britain lost Tabarka; I don’t know any other TL where I’d be bent out of shape over a coral fishery). Unfortunate that I’m finishing this timeline and participating in it when it seems to be nearing its end, but I’m happy I joined the ride at all.

My favorite moment was probably the Siege of Ajaccio under Theodore I. I remember thinking that it was the most Theodore-esque way to do a siege: who else would have a ship from a world power shoot down an enemy vessel, salvage the guns from the ship after it sinks, and then have his men carry them up a cliff to build a new fort? Just the level of braggadocio that that takes is something only Theodore, Pater Patriae Corsicae himself, could pull off.

Other questions/comments:
1) Any particular reason why the names of important characters are no longer bolded in updates? Were there just too many characters to keep track of? It’s a shame, I liked that bolding.
2) Since Theodore I and Eleonora died without issue, who owns Guastalla now? It looks on the maps like it’s just reverted to the Habsburgs; is that true?
3) I echo the sentiment of the other readers that this should be sent to Sea Lion Press for publication, at least after the reversions on the other website are finished. Maybe split it up into three volumes (the war, the rest of Theodore I’s reign, then the reigns of Frederick and Theodore II)?

Eagerly awaiting the next update, can’t wait to see how you wrap up this masterpiece of AH :)
 
1) Any particular reason why the names of important characters are no longer bolded in updates? Were there just too many characters to keep track of? It’s a shame, I liked that bolding.

It's something I started doing with my first TL, Sons of the Harlot Empress, because that was an early medieval TL in which nobody had last names and it was really easy to confuse people. I kept doing it in this thread, but people occasionally asked me why. "Why indeed," I thought, as the characters in this story are rather more distinct (and this whole story covers a little over 50 years rather than centuries like SotHE), and I eventually stopped doing it. I could certainly do it again, if people found it helpful.

2) Since Theodore I and Eleonora died without issue, who owns Guastalla now? It looks on the maps like it’s just reverted to the Habsburgs; is that true?

Correct. Guastalla was an imperial fief, and it thus reverted to the emperor when the last duke died without issue in 1746. That would have happened ITTL even if Theodore and Eleonora had children, though - Eleonora was only the duchess of Guastalla by marriage and had no personal rights to the duchy (she was the wife of the last duke, who was insane, and they had no children together). There is no circumstance in which Theodore or his progeny could have inherited Guastalla; it simply doesn't work that way. Eleonora ruled over the duchy for a few years after her husband's death (1746-48) as a sort of interim regent because the Habsburgs were occupied with the WAS, but it had already formally reverted to imperial sovereignty.

IOTL, the Habsburgs then ceded Guastalla to the Spanish Bourbons along with Parma and Piacenza in the Treaty of Aix-la-Chapelle. ITTL, the (slightly) better outcome of the WAS for Austria means that they keep Guastalla and it remains part of Austrian Italy rather than joining Parma.

3) I echo the sentiment of the other readers that this should be sent to Sea Lion Press for publication, at least after the reversions on the other website are finished. Maybe split it up into three volumes (the war, the rest of Theodore I’s reign, then the reigns of Frederick and Theodore II)?

I'm considering it. At the moment I'm still trying to wrap this up (sorry for the delay) and working on restarting the "edited" timeline over at SV, which has stalled because I've reached one of my least favorite chapters in KTC and I'm trying to figure out what to do with it.

Thanks for the support, and I'm glad you've enjoyed it!
 
Last edited:
…Thanks for the support, and I'm glad you've enjoyed it!
Of course, looking forward to following this story to its conclusion!

So what are some of the major changes you’ve made to the SV/final version? Did you end up retconning the second PoD with Richard Ortega?
 
So what are some of the major changes you’ve made to the SV/final version? Did you end up retconning the second PoD with Richard Ortega?
I did indeed straighten out the Ortega situation. Aside from that, most of the changes have been to wording/grammar. Occasionally I have made edits in the name of narrative consistency (now that I know where the story ends up going) or to reflect things that I know now which I didn't know back in 2018, but the plot points have not changed significantly.

If the Sufficient Velocity one is the "edited" version, does that mean this one is no longer canon?

I mean... what is canon, really? 🤷‍♂️ There is no "Neuhoff Cinematic Universe" over which I need to maintain consistency - this story is this story, and the story over at SV is the story over at SV. I suppose the latter is more "polished" than the former because of my editing, and if I did eventually publish KTC I would use the edited version, but that doesn't make this one wrong or illegitimate or something. This is my original work and I intend to keep it in its original condition.
 
All for Nothing New
All for Nothing


GOuWlSM.png

Emperor Joseph and his generals


The allied plan for the autumn campaign of 1786 had to be hastily modified because of the unmanageable breach which had opened between Berlin and Dresden. The disproportionate losses of the Saxon army at Polkowitz, the arrival of the presumably pro-Hohenzollern Russian Army of Observation, and the general umbrage of the Saxon elector Friedrich August III towards subjecting his army to the command of his old enemy Prince Heinrich combined to make the continued existence of the united “Electoral Army” untenable.

The solution formulated in London was to conduct the war with two armies on two fronts. The Brandenburgers and newly-arrived Russians would comprise the “eastern” army, under the command of Prince Heinrich of Brandenburg and general Alexander Suvorov, commander of the Russian Army of Observation. The “western” army would be composed of Saxons, Hanoverians, Hessians, and other German contingents under the command of the Saxon Field Marshal Ludwig Ernst von Benekendorf and Karl Wilhelm Ferdinand, Prince of Brunswick-Wolfenbüttel. While the eastern force would continue its push into Silesia, the western army would invade northeastern Bohemia. The main imperial army, presently encamped near Liegnitz, would thus be threatened from both north and south in a grand pincer movement.

The Austrian forces had also undergone a leadership change. Emperor Joseph had opted to take personal command of the army at Liegnitz, but as he had no battlefield experience, practical command rested with Field Marshal Ernst Gideon von Laudon. Laudon, one of Marshal Browne’s most talented and aggressive corps commanders, had come out of retirement at the emperor’s request to replace his comrade Lacy.[1] Laudon took the opportunity of the coalition’s reshuffle to drive Prince Heinrich off his high ground and place Glogau under siege, but the arrival of the Russians forced Laudon to back off and regroup. The Austrians very nearly suffered another disaster when Suvorov led his corps in an unexpectedly swift crossing of the Oder behind Laudon’s army and smashed a division on his right flank. It was now Laudon’s turn to be driven back until he was finally forced to make a stand before Liegnitz. At the Battle of Lüben, perhaps the finest tactical achievement of the war, Prince Heinrich and Suvorov managed to divide and defeat the larger Austrian army.

While this victory was hailed in the courts of the coalition, Suvorov was dissatisfied. He blamed Prince Heinrich for allowing the Austrians to escape with the bulk of their army at both Glogau and Lüben. Although the two men were both famously talented commanders, the prince’s cautious, deliberate style continually clashed with Suvorov’s audacious aggression. If Heinrich had been more like his late brother, Suvorov lamented, the autumn campaign would have ended with the complete destruction of the imperial army. But their situations were not the same: When Friedrich had invaded Silesia 45 years earlier, he had done so to seize the province for himself. In 1786, however, the ostensible goal of the war was to check Habsburg ambitions, not to regain Silesia for the Hohenzollerns. Prince Heinrich believed that this was a worthy goal, but because it was a shared goal, there was no reason that Brandenburg ought to risk everything to achieve it. Suvorov, in contrast, was just a tourist; he had no other purpose than burnishing Russia’s glory, and risked nothing but his own reputation.

As the armies went into winter quarters at the end of 1786, there were fresh hopes that a diplomatic solution might finally be possible. France, still a neutral party, hosted secret talks between British and Austrian envoys at Lunéville, and the British were hopeful that the “lesson” of Lüben would be sufficient to make Joseph back down. This lesson, however, was undermined by Field Marshal András Hadik, the commander of a secondary imperial army defending Bohemia. The Saxon commander Benekendorf had insisted on wintering his army in Bohemia to avoid placing the burden of forage on his own country, prompting Hadik to plan a surprise counterattack. Hadik’s cavalry commander, Karl Borromäus von Liechtenstein, launched repeated raids to conceal the fact that Hadik’s army had broken out of winter quarters in the middle of January and was trudging through the snow straight for Benekendorf’s camp. At the ensuing Battle of Reichenberg, the “western” coalition army was caught entirely off-guard and driven back into Saxony in disarray.[2]

While Austrian diplomats stalled at Lunéville after news of Reichenberg, other Austrian envoys traveled to Dresden to see if the weakest link of the coalition could be broken. Saxon suspicion towards their Russian and Brandenburger allies was well known, and they would bear the brunt of any Austrian counteroffensive. While Saxony’s army was not the most formidable part of the alliance, their territory was strategically critical, as the supply lines of all coalition forces ran through it. By April, as the armies began preparing to leave winter quarters, the British found themselves faced with wavering allies and declining domestic support. The signal victories at Polkowitz and Lüben seemed to mean nothing at all.

The British ministry, even as they declared their commitment to ending the war, seemed set on escalating it. The British ambassador in Turin sought to interest the King of Sardinia in joining the war, or at least threatening to; the king declined. Britain urged the princes to commit more forces, and asked the same of Pyotr, but this latter request became irrelevant in June when the Ottoman Empire declared war on Russia. The Sultan had never resigned himself to the humiliating loss of the Crimean Khanate and his control over the Danubian Principalities, and now seemed as good a moment as ever to strike while Russia was committed elsewhere.

Nevertheless, the Austrian position remained difficult. Pyotr soon recalled Suvorov but maintained the expeditionary force, not only to preserve his reputation but to keep the British subsidy. The Saxons considered defecting, but the one thing that could have secured this - territorial concessions - Joseph was still unwilling to give, and Austria’s attempt to turn the screws on the elector with an incursion into Saxony led by FZM Michael Johann von Wallis was foiled by Prince Karl of Brunswick-Wolfenbüttel at the Battle of Zittau in July. In Silesia, Laudon and Heinrich spent the whole summer maneuvering around each other. Increasingly outnumbered, Prince Heinrich was technically the loser of the Battle of Striegau in September - in terms of the overall troops committed, the largest battle of the war - but he withdrew in good order and Austrian casualties were much higher than his own. At the same time, a coalition corps invaded and occupied the Rhenish Palatinate and Austrian Luxembourg, and Wallis was forced back onto the defensive in Bohemia. Faced with a seemingly intractable and increasingly expensive war, with no indication that his enemies would be evicted from Austrian territory any time soon, Joseph finally consented to serious peace negotiations.

Joseph was not ready to abandon the “Bavarian Plan,” but it was clear that pursuing it without laying the proper diplomatic groundwork had been a blunder. Austria had been completely isolated; France, their actual ally, had remained neutral, while Russia, a longtime partner against the Ottomans, had turned against them. For now, the emperor had to swallow his pride and accept that the forces arrayed against him at the moment were too difficult and costly to overcome, but the affair permanently embittered him against the British and Russians, who in his view had intervened in a conflict not their own in order to humiliate the House of Habsburg. The King of Britain, at least, had an excuse in that he was also the Elector of Hanover and thus had a personal stake in imperial politics, but Russia’s intervention looked cynical and mercenary, an attempt to throw their weight around in Germany while Britain paid them to do it.

Although Britain’s coalition partners urged some sort of punitive peace against Austria, the British did not believe they were in a position to drive a hard bargain at the peace table. The coalition still occupied Austrian land, including Lower Silesia and Luxembourg, and the electors of Saxony and Brandenburg both hoped to gain something with it. The British, however, were only really interested in checking Austrian expansion - a goal which now seemed attainable - and were worried that the balance of power might shift against them if they were slow to act. The French had recently warned them that they would not be able to stand idly by if the coalition attempted to carve up their Austrian ally. This was surely a bluff given the state of French finances, and some British diplomats suspected as much, but it could not be entirely discounted. More seriously, the Ottoman advance into Russia had not yet been checked and the British feared that Pyotr might decide to withdraw his Army of Observation any day now. Prince Heinrich was already being forced to yield ground in the face of superior numbers, and stringing out the negotiations for weeks or months longer might only erode the coalition’s territorial leverage.

On November 30th of 1787, the principal belligerents signed the Treaty of Leipzig, which formally ended the War of the Bavarian Succession. The treaty represented a return to the status quo, with Austrian forces withdrawing from Lower Bavaria in exchange for the withdrawal of coalition forces from Silesia and the Netherlands. A few minor territorial adjustments and diplomatic concessions were made to make sure everyone - at least, everyone except the Elector of Bavaria [3] - walked away with something. Saxony received rights to the “Schönburg lordships,” a number of Bohemian fiefdoms located within Saxon territory, and received monetary compensation in exchange for the elector renouncing his claims to Bavaria. Brandenburg received imperial consent for the union of the Hohenzollern principalities Ansbach and Bayreuth with Brandenburg. For all its efforts, Austria walked away with only Mindelheim, which Bavaria had acquired in 1714, as well as a promise from the electors that they would not follow through on their threat to deny the next imperial election to the Habsburgs.

Russia received nothing material from the war, but emerged with greater prestige and influence both within the Empire and beyond it. Despite being caught off-guard by the Turkish invasion and suffering a few initial setbacks, the Russians rallied and were able to chase the Ottoman armies back over the Danube. In 1790 the Sultan was forced to relinquish Budjak, including the fortresses of Izmail and Akkerman, and had to accept the formal independence of Dacia, which despite being unified under a Wettin prince had remained a notional vassal of the Porte. “Prince Xaveriu” subsequently declared himself King of Dacia, the latest addition since the Neuhoffs to the crowned heads of Europe. Regrettably, a royal crown did not make his state any more functional, and his newfound “independence” was burdened with considerable Russian influence. Some remarked that Franz Xaver had simply exchanged one master for another.

One final casualty of the war was the nascent Anglo-French rapprochement. Following the Treaty of Paris, British leaders had attempted to end the longstanding rivalry between their two countries on the basis of supposed mutual interest. With their colonial squabbles settled (in Britain’s favor), the British hoped that their two countries could bury the proverbial hatchet and turn their attention to the east in order to check the “imperial powers” of Austria and Russia. France’s response to these overtures was somewhat cool, but their refusal to take Austria’s side in the Bavarian war seemed to suggest that they shared Britain’s concern for Habsburg expansionism. Yet Britain’s outreach to the Russians had alarmed French leaders, who suspected that Britain’s declared interest in checking the “imperial powers” was not entirely genuine, while the British suspected that the French - who had considerable influence in Constantinople - were the puppet masters behind the Sultan’s inopportune intervention.

The final straw was the situation in the Netherlands, which had been sliding into disorder even as the Habsburg and coalition armies clashed in Silesia and Bohemia. A long-brewing conflict between the “Patriots” and the “Orangists” seemed to be on the verge of boiling over into outright civil war, and the British suspected - correctly, as it turned out - that the French were actively encouraging the Patriot movement against the pro-British stadtholder Willem V. By 1787 the British cabinet had come to the conclusion that military intervention on Willem’s behalf might be necessary, which was impossible while the Bavarian War continued. Even after Leipzig, however, the British were unable to effect a military solution, as the Elector of Brandenburg refused to offer his assistance and the British could find no other suitable proxy. Soon Emperor Joseph was offering succor to the Patriots as well, if only to stick a finger in Britain’s eye after they had caused him such injury and humiliation over the matter of Bavaria. Nobody actually wanted a civil war, and France would eventually broker a deal between the factions that gave significant concessions to the Patriots. From Britain’s perspective, there was no other way to see this other than an attempt to erode British influence in the Netherlands while strengthening the Austro-French alliance. The ephemeral dream of Gaul and Albion joining forces to give the law to Europe was dead.



Europe in 1790 after the Russo-Turkish War


Footnotes
[1] At 69 years old Laudon was even older than Lacy, but central Europe had not seen war for a quarter-century and trotting out gray-haired veterans of the Prussian War was all anyone in Vienna could really think of.
[2] This was the last battle of Hadik, an acknowledged master of cavalry and irregular warfare. At 76 years old he was ancient even by the standards of Austrian commanders, and riding around in the snow at Reichenberg very nearly killed him. He became gravely ill after the battle and had to relinquish command to Wallis, who proved to be less effective. Astonishingly, Hadik eventually recovered and would live to see his 80th birthday, but he would never take the field again. In contrast, this was the first major battle in the career of “Karl von Neuhoff, Herzog von Sartena.” As a close personal aide to Liechtenstein, Hadik’s chief cavalry commander, Sartena was in a position to witness the planning of Hadik’s winter offensive and saw action at Reichenberg. Indeed, the young adjutant got closer to the action than he meant to: while carrying orders to one of Liechtenstein’s brigade commanders, Sartena ran right into a Saxon picket in the woods. One of the soldiers shot a hole through Sartena’s coat, but the prince was not injured and managed to gallop away.
[3] Although Bavaria was the object of the war, it did not actually take part. Karl Theodor did nothing to oppose the Austrian occupation, and the Bavarian army was never mobilized. Most of the other imperial princes who took part in the war were on the side of the coalition, but some remained loyal to the emperor - most notably the Duke of Württemberg, whose policy was to do whatever pleased Vienna in the hopes that the emperor would reward him with an electoral title.
 
Top