Looks like Wilson's government and Wall Street could being seeing a few of these in their futures.
Last edited:
Faggots are a unit of weight for the measurement of Iron and steel, so they could be used for unfilled bombs, but not filled ones, or oc course for solid steel shot. Possibly for guns and their carriages?
They were all on about carriers, radars, Swordsfish and Albacores, and would you believe Turret fighters! We are now back on track over there having had a brief mention of experimental semi automatic .303 rifles. It is getting hard to tell which thread I'm on.....Dear Sir, may I opine that this is not the “Tank Gun Calibre Argument Thread”, but rather the “Small Arms Calibre Argument Thread”. I think you may be looking for “Sir John Carden Survives”…
I restrained the urge to comment on the horrifying prospect of a garand in 303. But he is moving to the Ross rifle company in my timeline so who knows what he and huot might develop together.They were all on about carriers, radars, Swordsfish and Albacores, and would you believe Turret fighters! We are now back on track over there having had a brief mention of experimental semi automatic .303 rifles. It is getting hard to tell which thread I'm on.....
I have now finished the project lightening video. The Lewis gun is much heavier the the Farquhar beardmore LMG. I see the Lewis as being an excellent example of a heavy LMG whilst I see the Farquhar beardmore as being more like a bren gun. I think it will be a case of more of both and also a question of the tactical uses.So BSA started working on the Lewis around 1911 and had it pretty much ready by 1913, this is when the Belgians get involved and start both purchasing from BSA and starting their own production. In addition the Lewis was combat ready by 1914, most of the kinks and quirks had been worked out by the start of the war, something that couldn't be said for a lot of other designs. The fact that the Lewis was only adopted by Britain in late 1915 is not due to any flaw in the weapon or it not being ready but more because the need for it was not officially recognised until after the 1915 Battles. In 1914 and early 1915 the British were desperately moving to a full war footing then preparing for the 1915 offensives.
If you want to see just how far ahead of the competition the Lewis was then watch Project Lightening from Forgotten Weapons and C&arsenal. It's 8 video's long but is comparing all the LMG's and LMG likes used in WW1 and the Lewis is the clear winner.
It will take a lot for any new, clean sheet design come out on top verses the Lewis in this time period. Designing a new gun, even from a head start position takes time and requires a lot of iteration and fine tuning.
I wasn't suggesting that the Lewis was a HMG just that it was a heavier light machine gun.I an not sure at under 30lb I would ever call the Lewis a heavy machine gun, Maxim's and Vickers are around double that weight and I would consider that the Bench mark for a HMG.
The Bren was only around 5 Lb less in weight than the early shrouded Lewis guns.
The stripped down Lewis as carried by the Home Guard soldier nearest the camera in the back row probably weighs little more than a Bren gun.
Thank you for the post. Wilson’s problems are escalating, I don’t know if the American response to japans visiting South America will be any stronger than their response to the battle of Easter island . In Mexico the Americans are as normal so far but the Mexican the various groups are going to actually meet so Mexico’sWell Wilson might have a way with bringing some people together. Between having the Anarchists and Red agitators that were the undesirables in Europe and now having the Japanese sending a Squadron of ships to South America, in what might be a violation of the Monroe Doctrine, and could even threaten US interests in the Far East, he now can take that to the American people and use that to get laws passed like they did in the Red Scare and improve the US's Navy and Army. Since Vera Cruz predates the start of this time line, what is going on down there in Mexico?
Enthusiastic young officers are almost as dangerous as enemy bullets.The sergeant was pleased that the prince would be an active participant in the platoon, he had been concerned that he was going to have to carry him, now it seemed more likely that he would have to restrain him.
No, other way around. A bullet can generally only kill one or two people at maximum. Enthusiastic young officers can get entire units killed.Enthusiastic young officers are almost as dangerous as enemy bullets.
This is where the sergeant needs to point out to Edward that the sword will make him a target to the enemy.The Prince weighed up the Sergeants advice “Sergeant I have another Pistol in my baggage, it was a gift from my father so that will give me two, I will use a rifle if we are in the open, but I think I will keep the sword, I have been training with them since I was a boy at Osborne, then Dartmouth and aboard Hindustan”
More to the point, it will make those around him a target for the enemy. That's why Prince Harry never deployed to Iraq, and why he subject to a medial blackout in Afghanistan then withdrawn as soon as it leaked. He's unlikely to listen to advice that he's in danger, but hopefully will to advice that he's putting his men in danger.This is where the sergeant needs to point out to Edward that the sword will make him a target to the enemy.
Not necessarily. The sword will not label him as "royal" but as "officer", as would, though perhaps less obviously, a revolver. A rifle would label him as "soldier". If anything, giving the enemy an obvious high value local target to fire at might give him men a slight, if brief respite.More to the point, it will make those around him a target for the enemy. That's why Prince Harry never deployed to Iraq, and why he subject to a medial blackout in Afghanistan then withdrawn as soon as it leaked. He's unlikely to listen to advice that he's in danger, but hopefully will to advice that he's putting his men in danger.
Half right, if they are going into urban combat then some non officers could be carrying a revolver, shotgun or some other item of what became known as trench stores instead of a rifle. Swords, for infantry, different for Cavalry as everyone had one, had already been shown to be a bullet magnet in South Africa and ordered there to be withdrawn to depot. It was therefore some form of utter madness/incompetence that allowed them to be carried by Infantry officers in the early days of WW1.Not necessarily. The sword will not label him as "royal" but as "officer", as would, though perhaps less obviously, a revolver. A rifle would label him as "soldier". If anything, giving the enemy an obvious high value local target to fire at might give him men a slight, if brief respite.
The British Army hadn't yet lowered its standards enough to allow an officer to dress as an Other Rank. Statistically a subaltern was more likely to be killed than a ranker so the move made perfect sense, although probably causing aneurisms at Horse Guards.Half right, if they are going into urban combat then some non officers could be carrying a revolver, shotgun or some other item of what became known as trench stores instead of a rifle. Swords, for infantry, different for Cavalry as everyone had one, had already been shown to be a bullet magnet in South Africa and ordered there to be withdrawn to depot. It was therefore some form of utter madness/incompetence that allowed them to be carried by Infantry officers in the early days of WW1.
Half right. Not all officers would be wearing swords, I grant you, in fact most would not have been, for the very cogent reasons you so correctly quote. However everyone seen to be carrying a sword would definitely be taken to be an officer though possibly a very silly one. Perhaps some soldiers would not shoot at an officer beariang a sword as would self evidently be an idiot and doing his side more harm than good., although I doubt it.Half right, if they are going into urban combat then some non officers could be carrying a revolver, shotgun or some other item of what became known as trench stores instead of a rifle. Swords, for infantry, different for Cavalry as everyone had one, had already been shown to be a bullet magnet in South Africa and ordered there to be withdrawn to depot. It was therefore some form of utter madness/incompetence that allowed them to be carried by Infantry officers in the early days of WW1.