The Mothers Allowance Reform Act 1887 restricted the Mothers Allowance of twelve shillings a week to a maximum of four children up to the age ten. It provided that the allowance would be payable only to mothers who were married and living with their husbands, and to widows, and who were not in paid employment, including self employment. The Act applied to Britain and the five counties of northern Ireland, but not to the rest of Ireland.
The Act was defended by government ministers on the grounds that it would substantially reduce public expenditure, and encourage marriage. It was a much needed blow against immorality. Women had been getting themselves pregnant with men whom they had no intention of marrying, in order to receive the allowance. A married couple should only have the number of children they could afford. If they could not afford more than four children they should practice restraint. No one mentioned contraception. The allowance was withdrawn from mothers in paid work, because they already had an income,
It was passionately opposed by the Commonwealth and Irish National parties. They condemned it as a vicious attack on working class women and children, Restriction of the allowance to a maximum of four children and abolishing it for unmarried mothers, would cause much distress and hardship, and greatly increase poverty. Children should not be punished for the sins of their parents. Mothers with young children went out to work only because of economic necessity.
Commonwealth Party women MPs and Peers were in the forefront of the opposition to the Mothers Allowance Reform Bill when it was going through Parliament, They said that mothers who had left violent husbands, single women who became pregnant by rape, and mothers whose husbands had deserted them, would no longer be entitled to the allowance. They referred to mothers in those situations who had written to them. The opposition to the bill in the House of Commons was led by Sarah Taylor. She pledged that the next Commonwealth government would repeal the Act in its entirety.
The Act was defended by government ministers on the grounds that it would substantially reduce public expenditure, and encourage marriage. It was a much needed blow against immorality. Women had been getting themselves pregnant with men whom they had no intention of marrying, in order to receive the allowance. A married couple should only have the number of children they could afford. If they could not afford more than four children they should practice restraint. No one mentioned contraception. The allowance was withdrawn from mothers in paid work, because they already had an income,
It was passionately opposed by the Commonwealth and Irish National parties. They condemned it as a vicious attack on working class women and children, Restriction of the allowance to a maximum of four children and abolishing it for unmarried mothers, would cause much distress and hardship, and greatly increase poverty. Children should not be punished for the sins of their parents. Mothers with young children went out to work only because of economic necessity.
Commonwealth Party women MPs and Peers were in the forefront of the opposition to the Mothers Allowance Reform Bill when it was going through Parliament, They said that mothers who had left violent husbands, single women who became pregnant by rape, and mothers whose husbands had deserted them, would no longer be entitled to the allowance. They referred to mothers in those situations who had written to them. The opposition to the bill in the House of Commons was led by Sarah Taylor. She pledged that the next Commonwealth government would repeal the Act in its entirety.
Last edited: