George the Iron Fisted
(London 1908)
George III was a man who was very out of touch with the British people, and the people of her colonies. He felt that Parliament had gained far too much power, and proceeded to use bribery to destroy all it's credibility and independence soon becoming a trivial formality for the authoritarian king. While this would allow George III the freedom he wanted it would ultimately speed the end of the old regime, the opposite of George's hope that more power would show how the royal family was more useful than a bickering parliament. He then set himself on a course of disaster angering almost everyone under British rule, except perhaps the Hanoverians. To pay for the cost of the two world wars he raised taxes in Britain and her colonies, the British citizens were pushed through the worst of if as French privateering had made the colonies far less profitable. Despite this George remained convinced that if he could tighten his grip around the American colonies he could get far more out of them for trade, and in doing so he neglected India the only colony thought truly useful by most of the British people. He thus angered the Yankees and the British people in one foul move that only continued to build up difficulties as George sent more soldiers to try to control the Yankees.
Due to the recent Jacobite uprisings during the Second World War George demanded that the remaining Highland clans swear there loyalty to him. This prompted the 1781 Uprising, where 8 000 Government soldiers fought 5 000 Scottish rebels, killed 1 000 rebels and are rumoured to have killed up to 200 women and children who were unfortunate enough to live in the region. This sealed the Scottish hatred for George, the Irish soon became nearly as angry as anti-catholic policies were strengthened. Many thousands fled to the Americas, passing through British colonies before leaving for New France or New Spain. George was unmoved by this and merely used it as a convenience to replace the Scots with sheep, which would do more for improving Britains economy. This led to many thousands of Highlanders forced into the cities during the 1780s and 1790s, where the angry poor Highlanders met with radical Libertists and Communitarians hoping to prepare Scotland for a revolution.
Meanwhile the EIC was left to rot by the government leaving them desperate for investment. While many prominent businessmen were willing to provide capital the RIC and VOC took interest in the weakness of of the EIC, while the Portuguese and Danish companies sought to strengthen their ally. The RIC was however richer than either of the EIC's allies and was able to by back much of their SWW losses. The EIC decided to expand away from the RIC during this period and used what little funds they had to gaind influence over their northern and eastern neighbours. During this period the EIC also began improving conditions for the locals so as to have some for of defence against the inevitable French aggression.
Finally the only respectable thing that George did was his push for the abolition of slavery, which would have been good if not for the fact that many of the Loyal Yankees were loyal because the Libertists and Communitarians opposed slavery, making the British the better choice in the eyes of the slave holders. The slave holders did remain mildly loyal, and used all there power to keep slavery from being abolished, though they new it was merely an inevitability, leading many to move to either Australia or the Natal colony looking to be able to declare Independence from there. It seemed inevitable that things would end badly for George. He only did one thing that improved his standing at all.
In 1780 he was visiting Vienna when he met Mary Caroline
[1] and, despite the fourteen year age difference, they fell in love. This was different from the scattering of affairs that George had had on his travels, something his servants recognized immediately. Many were happy as there was fear that George would not produce and heir, the couple would have to overcome a rather large hurdle . . .
Two English Kings in Vienna
(Budapest 1956)
In 1780 King George III of Britain was visiting Vienna in hopes of rebuilding the alliance that his father and grandfather had destroyed. Also in 1780 Charles IV decided that as the King of England recognized by the Pope he would be able to get Austrian backing as well as French and he therefore set off to Vienna. While in the past the Stuarts had been unpopular with the Hanovarians Charles IV detested the Stuarts for the massacre of his family. At first it was merely a matter of out doing the other, both kings showing up to the best parties attempting to be the center of attention. The desperate Austrians eventually began introducing George as the elector of Hanover, and Charles as the King of the Channel Islands. This was not simply about pleasing both, but also the Austrians not wanting to anger the Pope for recognizing the other King of Britain, but not wanting to ruin a possible alliance with Britain. Things remained chilly, the Austrians needing to please both sides, yet not knowing how much attention would give the right balance.
Things grew more complicated when the sisters of Mary Caroline and Mary Antonia
[2] met the two rival kings. Charles IV was between the two sisters in age, while George III was note ably older. Yet Caroline soon fell for George III in what is considered by many a fairy tale relationship, while Charles IV fell for Antonia long before she fell for him. This left their older brother Emperor Joseph II in a very difficult situation. On one side he risked alienating Britain once again, on the other he risked the rage of the Pope, the French, and their allies. Joseph also new that the Catholic Germans would be angered if he chose George III, while the more radical nationalists would be angered if he chose Charles IV. Eventually Joseph II decided that George III was the better choice and attempted to forbid Antonia from marrying Charles IV, at which point Antonia decided she would leave with Charles IV whom she had finally come to love.
The night before Charles IV and Antonia were set to leave Charles IV was attending a dinner that George III was also attending in order to try and outshine George III as always when he over heard George III talking with some Austrian nobles. What exactly was said is still hotly debated to this day by Indian and English historians
[3]. According to the English George III said something along the lines of: "I wish Charles had died with his family during the War," while the Indians say the real words were closer to: "It's horrible but sometimes I almost wish Charles had died with his family," which while still quite negative are not as horrible as the English accusation. Hearing this Charles IV immediately demanded a duel in his hot blooded rage, which much to everyone's surprise George III accepted. The next morning the two kings met outside the city for a duel with pistols, George III soon revealed that he had hoped to shame Charles IV into giving up, not realising that Charles IV would still be furious the next morning. The two kings thus faced off in a duel, George III being to stubborn to give in. Charles IV proved the better swordsman, cutting George III on the leg. Thus Charles IV left victorious, and George was left with a tell tale limp that would later cost him his life.
[1]Maria Carolina, Mary Antoinette's sister. She did not marry the King of Naples in D-398 as her older sister Maria Josepha survived to marry him instead.
[2]Marie Antoinette, with her name less Frenchified
[3]The Australians, Scottish, Irish and pretty well everyone else argue the point as well but not to the same ferocity.