There’s no chance of the Romans conquering Persia. The more likely scenario is they sack and burn their way through Persia, releasing any peripheral territories they can (maybe even a Despotate in Mesopotamia).Just how Greek is Persia going to be after conquest? The Parthians reversed a great deal of Hellenism in Persian culture but I'm sure there are some echoes left, Iskander's name itself proving.
Odysseus i certainly going to try... And daddy Demetrius has set up the game hugely in his favor.There’s no chance of the Romans conquering Persia. The more likely scenario is they sack and burn their way through Persia, releasing any peripheral territories they can (maybe even a Despotate in Mesopotamia).
It seems the tides have definitely turned. The question is what will the Ottomans and Theodor try next? One more defeat and they will probably be done for, but as it stands they aren't down for the count just yet.
Hopefully Demetrios catches on to what is happening in Georgia before the Roman and Georgian armies actually clash. The last thing Rome needs is a pointless war on a new frontier against people that should be steadfast allies. Those 30,000 men would also probably be the nail in the coffin for either Theodor or the Ottomans depending on where they are sent. Add whatever troops the Georgians can provide as soon as they have solved their succession issues and suddenly Rome's enemies are in even bigger trouble than they were before.
leaving a twenty-kilometer wide swathe of destruction, plumes of burning villagers rising into the clear blue sky
He glanced over at Odysseus, sketching on a large canvas with a lead pencil, nibbling absentmindedly on the end as he pondered the scene in front of him
So let me put all my thought in one post here:
Mesopotamia and the Far East is apparently where all of Rome's capable subordinates have gone off to. Would've been nice if they were in Europe or Syria but c'est la vie. It is certainly working out nicely for them in Mesopotamia and East Indies.
As much as Rhomania would like that I doubt that will happen for two reason. One if they do there is a good possibility the Arabs and Kurds may have the same idea of leaving Mesopotamia. The second, and even greater, reason is that an independent Mesopotamia will only survive and not get reconquered by Ottoman Persia if they having the backing of Rhomania, in essence becoming a near tributary of the Empire.There is already some resentment at Ibrahim from the Mesopotamian Turks.
I won’t be surprised if Mesopotamia completely breaks off
I don't think that mesopotamia can even go the way of the swiss because, unlike Switzerland mesopotamia is very very valuable in agriculture and not a single mountain to protect themAs much as Rhomania would like that I doubt that will happen for two reason. One if they do there is a good possibility the Arabs and Kurds may have the same idea of leaving Mesopotamia. The second, and even greater, reason is that an independent Mesopotamia will only survive and not get reconquered by Ottoman Persia if they having the backing of Rhomania, in essence becoming a near tributary of the Empire.
Their best bet would be to push for greater influence and play kingmaker when Ibrahim dies that way they stay an important province in a powerful empire rather than a state trying to balance two neighboring ones off each other. though the idea of Mesopotamia going Swiss is fun to think about.
No arms industry to speak of either. I can see the Switzerland scheme working for Afghanistan, but not Mesopotamia.
That's assuming the Ottoman Empire takes them, and that the current plan of selling them into slavery isn't enough to recoup losses of making them go away from their ancestral homeland.Wait so the Romans are basically going on a death march against it Muslim populations at home becasue of the constant rebellions and massive losses life, money, soldiers, etc. So due to the fact that just wiping out the entire population is costly and would prob have a physiological impact on them as well. Prob cost some money as well. Why not move these pop to the Ottoman empire destabilize it a bit and foreign populations and stuff concentrate the ethnic groups so that they are they go to becomes the majority that and cause the empire to further fracture and weaken the ethnic groups. This would cost money but the other options is to move them to the European side of the empire and just cause chaos in the enemy empires? Too cRazy
?Wait so the Romans are basically going on a death march against it Muslim populations at home becasue of the constant rebellions and massive losses life, money, soldiers, etc. So due to the fact that just wiping out the entire population is costly and would prob have a physiological impact on them as well. Prob cost some money as well. Why not move these pop to the Ottoman empire destabilize it a bit and foreign populations and stuff concentrate the ethnic groups so that they are they go to becomes the majority that and cause the empire to further fracture and weaken the ethnic groups. This would cost money but the other options is to move them to the European side of the empire and just cause chaos in the enemy empires? Too cRazy
okay however a broke empire battered have to take in a huge amount of people and having to integrate them and after the Romans roam through the empire and raze everything to the ground that feed them. I assume the romasn also want reperations you get my point. So they will have a problem intergrating them for a long time and will certainly cause problems for the empire In the long run becasue they will be vindicative and be anger but once the genratiosn that lived there dies thye just be liek the rest of the emprie.?
How do you figure that Levantine Muslims would be disruptive to the Ottomans? We're in the early modern era, Romanticism and the idea of ethnic-nationalism is far away still. If anything the displaced Muslims would be furious with the Roman Empire for displacing them from their ancestral homes and be fanatically loyal to the Ottoman Shah-Sultan for taking them in. They'd become productive subjects of the Ottomans within a generation at most. Your proposal basically has the Romans spending money and effort to give its biggest rival a bunch of tax-payers. That's the opposite of helpful.
okay however a broke empire battered have to take in a huge amount of people and having to integrate them and after the Romans roam through the empire and raze everything to the ground that feed them. I assume the romasn also want reperations you get my point. So they will have a problem intergrating them for a long time and will certainly cause problems for the empire In the long run becasue they will be vindicative and be anger but once the genratiosn that lived there dies thye just be liek the rest of the emprie.