Footloose

PA-1507880_a6x4kq.jpg

The early hours, 25th March 1983

“Balls!”

Michael Foot let his go-to word for these kind of situations reverberate through the dark rooms of his north London town house. Almost simultaneously, he threw his dog-eared copy of H.G. Wells at the television screen, with all his anger, frustration and strength, yet still doing little to alter what was being broadcast, in all its grainy technicolour.

Darlington had been lost.

Vincent Hanna was to blame, of course. Having been off with a bloody flu for the last few weeks, some tea boy had filled in, giving an easy ride to all the candidates, which was good for Ossie, but left the good people of Darlington with the silly impression that that bloody Cook had at least half a brain-cell! Foot couldn’t stand the sight of him, the light-weight soggy bastard was on the telly now, smiling away. He’d come third, but only just. The damage had been done none the less, the anti-Tory vote was split, and Michael bloody Fallon had come straight up the middle.

This had been something of a last chance saloon for Foot for some time. Rumblings in the PLP about a “fresh start” in the lead up to the election had been growing, and he couldn’t exactly blame them for it. He was getting tired of the job, not that he’d exactly wanted it in the first place. Benn and Healey tearing chunks out of each-other, the gang of four, the Falklands, it had all been a nightmare, and as each day went past the chance of election victory, the chance to get the country back on track, seemed to vanish further and further away from his grasp. Now his chances of even staying on as leader had all but evaporated. Neil, bless him, would stand up for him, but it was no good. The unions would be making arrangements by the morning, probably planning for Healey to take over in the meantime, or would they plan a quick leadership election? Christ, anything but that. Benn would no doubt already be whipping up support, and he had heard a lot of positive things about Neil from others.

What would happen to him now? Muddling on, he supposed. There would be more books to read and more books to write. He had missed the backbenches for some time.

He heaved a little as he leaned over to pick the book off the floor. By the time he got back to an upright position, which, to be frank, wasn’t exactly a quick manoeuvre for him anymore, the telephone started ringing.

Things were moving a lot quicker than he thought.
 
I think I see what's happening...

But I don't think replacing Foot at this point will do much for Labour this late in the game. Consider me interested.
 

Sideways

Donor
Good start, and an interesting period. 1983 seems to be really topical at the moment. I am intrigued.
 
Thank you all for the kind words.

I cannae be arsed to do the whole back-and-forth thing so I think I'll just lay out a quick introduction here.

So here we go, this is my first TL for quite some time (discounting the various SW Election Games I always have on the go) and hopefully one I'll be able to finish. The origins of it come from my pretty hefty reading around the subject of Labour in the 1980s as part of some personal study. I came across this POD almost by accident, and it is one I have been playing with for sometime.

So yes, the premise is that Labour has lost the 1983 Darlington by-election due to Vincent Hanna, the famed by-election journalist, being off sick during the campaign, his tough interviewing style thus being unable to highlight the weaknesses of the SDP's candidate Tony Cook, a man described by many in hindsight as a very unsuitable candidate for such a critical election, who later was described by Bill Rodgers as destroying the party's momentum. As such, with Tony Cook still seen as a reasonable candidate, the SDP's vote share remains high, splitting Labour's vote and allowing the Conservative candidate Michael Fallon (our OTL Defence Secretary) to come through the middle and win. The by-election was touted at the time as being Foot's last chance to prove himself as leader, with the by-election lost, Foot has no choice but to resign.
 
This is Shore to be Healey good. I just hope you don't try to be too Wedgie.

Roy Hattersley.

You have got to be Kinnocking me. I'll Heffer you know that-[is blown up by the Conquerer]

Anyway, looks good. I think Labour might do worse as a result from tha fallout of a leader resigning mere months before an election.
 
Sorry for the wait guys, I've recently moved house so internet connection is temperamental-to-nonexistent.
 
denis_healey_labour.jpg


Foot’s resignation as leader of the Labour Party in the early hours of Friday, 25th March 1983 plunged the PLP into one of the strangest long weekends in its history. Many on the right saw Foot’s departure as one final, great opportunity to save the party from complete decimation at the general election, tipped by many to be just weeks away. Many centrists and figures of the emerging soft-left, such as Kinnock and others in the Pro-Foot Tribune Group saw it instead as a shattering loss, costing the party its last, truly unifying figure. While in the shadows of the backbenches, the Bennite Campaign Group, still licking its wounds since the dashed dreams of 1981, saw its chance to bring the party back to its democratically decided socialist program under the leadership of the Group’s firebrand patron, Tony Benn.

Party, Union and Parliamentary offices were alive with activity within the first few hours, with various ambiguous and vague press releases spreading through various conflicting channels. David Basnett, chairman of the Trade Unions for Labour Victory campaign was quick to call for a “unifying” parliamentary vote for an acting leader, while Tony Benn’s office warned against an “undemocratic coronation”, a rather obtuse jab at the tipped favourite to replace Foot, his deputy Denis Healey. Healey himself, a stalwart of the right, had missed out on taking the leadership three years before, mostly due to a brash, neglectful and overconfident campaign. Now, however, as his talented loyalists began to circle around him in a defensive testudo of press releases and media appearances, all of whom calling for an interim leader in the run up to the general election, all efforts were made to avoid any form of contest but instead a unanimous approval for him, as Deputy, to take over.

Though carrying sway the once dominant right-wing of the party, an entity severely withered by defections to SDP and the Bennite ascension over the last three years, the soft and hard left respectively were up in arms at the prospect of a coronation. Though a supporter of Healey in all but name during the 1981 Deputy Leadership crisis, Kinnock’s affiliation to the CLPD and position as a firm supporter of the new Electoral College, made him quick off the mark to attack the so called “undemocratic elements” within the PLP, with many soon beginning to discuss the prospect of his own candidacy. Peter Shore, another figure of the Tribunite soft-left, though having no great love for the new order of things said that it would “not be sensible” to go against the new rules of the party for the sake of convenience.

A war of words and interviews between varying factions began soon after. Hattersley and Prescott, in scenes that would prove to foreshadow events four years later, traded verbal blows in a joint appearance on the six o’clock news. At a CLP meeting in Islwyn, the issue of Kinnock’s future ambitions came under intense scrutiny and discussion, an issue he himself sort to infamously dodge. In Bristol, Benn began plans for a new grassroots campaign for the leadership, a campaign which had been in the making since the Winter of Discontent sealed the fate of Callaghan and had come under its first trial run just two years before. Throughout the tea rooms of Westminster, Shore sought to whip up support among the soft-left and centrists of the party, both fearful of Benn, resentful of Healey and uninspired by Kinnock. Meanwhile, Healey himself, the once-heir apparent, found himself left far behind in a leadership campaign he never anticipated.

Ultimately, however, after a three day phoney war between the various factions of the party, with the Alliance experiencing another polling “bump” after Darlington and Conservative MPs licking their lips over the prospect of a decimating general election against a leaderless Labour Party, it was Tony Benn who fired the first real shot.


Monday, 28th March 1983

With his wife by his side and a collection of supporters around him, Tony Benn strode confidently towards the crowd of waiting journalists on iconic lawn of parliament square.

Benn had always been an ambitious man. From his early days as an MP, a loyal Gaitskellite, through his career as a cabinet minister under two Prime Ministers, and up to his rise to prominence as a left-wing campaigner and darling of the grassroots. All of it had been with a clear goal in mind, and all of it had led to this key moment. From the disappointment of 1976, to the ham-fisted speculation of 1980, to the incredible result of 1981, all of it had been a preparation.

“Good morning, gentlemen.” He said, with a curt nod. “I shall try and keep this as brief as possible as I am sure we shall all have a very busy schedule over the next few weeks.”

He retrieved from his jacket pocket a folded paper and began to read from it. “Today I am formally announcing my candidature for the leadership of the Labour Party. First I would like to pay tribute to our departing leader, Michael Foot. Michael has been a loyal and intensely active member of the party for nearly fifty years, and has dedicated his life to public service, to intellectual rigour and the course of British Democratic Socialism. And for that, he has earned my immense respect and admiration. But things have changed, and it is time for a new leader. A leader committed to transforming this party into a true democratic, social movement with the aim of creating a more equal, democratic and social society, for all. I believe - if the party is willing to support me - that I am someone willing and able to achieve this…”
 
Last edited:
As soon as the internecine warfare really starts, then Margaret Thatcher decides to go and see the Queen and have the general election on May 6th 1983, which was under consideration and would almost certainly have happened if Fallon had won Darlington. As it was, Maggie who was always a bit frit of elections, decided to look at the entrails coming out of the local elections first.

Such Fun!
 
Very good, Alf.

I said the other day I'd defer to Iain on the 80s, but I still think there's a reasonable chance that Mrs T would back away from an election while Labour were leaderless. It's just Not The Done Thng. On the other hand, if it looks like Benn will win the leadership, he's the one man the Tories are so afraid of (as an ideologue, not an election winner) that they'd maybe be able to be convinced to go to the country while there isn't a permanent LOTO.

Other notes: Benn was a cabinet minister, not cabinet secretary. And Gaitskellite he was, but stalwart of the right is a step too far IMHO. He certainly moved left but his focus shifted from building socialism through technology to building socialism through a mass movement.

Keep this up, I don't know what's next and I like that.
 
As soon as the internecine warfare really starts, then Margaret Thatcher decides to go and see the Queen and have the general election on May 6th 1983, which was under consideration and would almost certainly have happened if Fallon had won Darlington. As it was, Maggie who was always a bit frit of elections, decided to look at the entrails coming out of the local elections first.

Such Fun!

We'll see, won't we. ;)

Very good, Alf.

I said the other day I'd defer to Iain on the 80s, but I still think there's a reasonable chance that Mrs T would back away from an election while Labour were leaderless. It's just Not The Done Thng. On the other hand, if it looks like Benn will win the leadership, he's the one man the Tories are so afraid of (as an ideologue, not an election winner) that they'd maybe be able to be convinced to go to the country while there isn't a permanent LOTO.

Other notes: Benn was a cabinet minister, not cabinet secretary. And Gaitskellite he was, but stalwart of the right is a step too far IMHO. He certainly moved left but his focus shifted from building socialism through technology to building socialism through a mass movement.

Keep this up, I don't know what's next and I like that.

Thanks mate!

Indeed, that's some of my own thinking as well. But with that quite a while away I am not fully decided on how to proceed.

Yeah, couple of typos I've only just noticed. Will change.

Thanks again! :D
 
Very nice read. It would be interesting to see the reaction to Thatcher calling an election a year early when Labour didn't have a leader. Some might call it the sort of iron-fisted, divide-and-rule opportunism that made her a bad leader - or a good leader, depending on your view.
 
Top