Go Back   Alternate History Discussion Board > Discussion > Alternate History Discussion: After 1900

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 19th, 2012, 09:02 AM
Adler17 Adler17 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1000 or more
WI U-203 had sank USS Texas

Quote:
1941

U-203 encountered the US battleship USS Texas and its destroyer screen on Neutrality Patrol about 800 miles south-southeast of Iceland. The U-boat followed the ship for over 20 hours and Mützelburg identified her clearly. He even tried to get in attack position because the ships were moving eastwards into the declared blockade area around Britain, but never came into firing range and stopped chasing them as they turned around.
From: Uboat.net

U-203 encountered USS Texas on June 19th. So what if USS Texas did not turn and moved into the blockade area and U-203 sank her? The USA were already fighting a kind of undeclared war against Germany. So what now?

Adler
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old June 19th, 2012, 09:10 AM
Devolved Devolved is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adler17 View Post
From: Uboat.net

U-203 encountered USS Texas on June 19th. So what if USS Texas did not turn and moved into the blockade area and U-203 sank her? The USA were already fighting a kind of undeclared war against Germany. So what now?

Adler
I wasn't aware of this one and if true then what a lost opportunity!

It would be great for everyone except the Germans and of course sailors on the USS Texas.

America would have to come into the war if A BATTLESHIP was torpedoed and sunk. They could overlook a destroyer or two but not the USS Texas. The vote for war would be less than for Pearl Harbor but it would be enough. It also comes 3 days before Barbarossa. What does Hitler do then?

A rather amusing problem I think.The U boat captain is either greeted as a hero on his return or gets a firing squad!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old June 19th, 2012, 09:17 AM
corditeman corditeman is offline
Corditeman
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Dalbeattie, Scotland
Posts: 1000 or more
Cool U-203 in trouble...

...Escort force would probably sink the submarine.

Diplodisaster for Germany - whether immediate US declaration of war is unclear because Wilson was a wuss.

Lloyd-George complained that at Versailles he had Jesus Christ (Wilson) on one side of him and the Devil (Clemenceau) on the other. No wonder the Treaty of Versailles was such a mess...
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old June 19th, 2012, 09:18 AM
Devolved Devolved is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by corditeman View Post
...Escort force would probably sink the submarine.

Diplodisaster for Germany - whether immediate US declaration of war is unclear because Wilson was a wuss.

Lloyd-George complained that at Versailles he had Jesus Christ (Wilson) on one side of him and the Devil (Clemenceau) on the other. No wonder the Treaty of Versailles was such a mess...
Wrong war.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old June 19th, 2012, 09:31 AM
MattII MattII is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 1000 or more
Roosevelt gets his casus belli, and the Pacific War is possibly averted after Japan realises that the the US aren't going to cry mother over losing battleships, they're going to fight even more fiercely.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old June 19th, 2012, 09:52 AM
Shaby Shaby is offline
Sontaran
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Flagship "Undefeatable" of the Battlefleet Ib
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by MattII View Post
Roosevelt gets his casus belli, and the Pacific War is possibly averted after Japan realises that the the US aren't going to cry mother over losing battleships, they're going to fight even more fiercely.
I do not think it would alter that much of Japanese outlook. They wagered their victory more on territorial gains and setting up impenetrable defensive barrier than on sinking fleet units. To them the latter was just a means to get to the former. They might even get encouraged by the fact that US attention is getting focused on Atlantic.

Provided U-Boat captain being so dimwit as to not recognize a US ship when he saw one, then all sorts of unpleasant things will ensue. Unpleasant that is, for Germany. Overall, I do not see US being able to do anything much earlier than it actually did OTL. Additional 5 months of full scale preparation might bring D-Day in May '44. Of course weather permitting. Maybe Africa gets secured before '42 runs out. All of those in itself welcome but not overall game changing differences.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by sharlin View Post
'Oh damn...knew we forgot something! GUYS! WE NEED TO BUNG A CARRIER DESIGN TOGETHER ASAP!'
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old June 19th, 2012, 09:58 AM
MattII MattII is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 1000 or more
If Operation Torch goes through early, the Japanese might be given cause to think again, after all, it will prove that the US can do en masse amphibious invasions.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old June 19th, 2012, 10:10 AM
Devolved Devolved is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1000 or more
June 1941 is a game changer. A mass mobilization in June/July 1941 instead of December 1941/Jan '42 brings a large US army to Europe months earlier than OTL. It would certainly mean that the Americans will get a D Day in 1943 which is closer to what they really wanted OTL.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old June 19th, 2012, 10:20 AM
MattII MattII is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 1000 or more
IMO this is deserving on a proper ATL, and I just wish I was up to writing one.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old June 19th, 2012, 10:28 AM
Devolved Devolved is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by MattII View Post
IMO this is deserving on a proper ATL, and I just wish I was up to writing one.
Based on past threads I don't think the OP will want to write a timeline in which the Americans enter the war just 3 days before Barbarossa and Germany is defeated by mid 1944.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old June 19th, 2012, 10:36 AM
MattII MattII is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 1000 or more
Hm, come to think about it, U-203 sinking USS Texas isn't that plausible IMO, it's be something a bit more like U-203 shadows the battlegroup containing USS Texas. The battlegroup considers the action hostile, and attacks, quickly sinking U-203, but not quickly enough that it can't get a message off. Hitler hears the message, and incensed, declares war on the US against the advice of his generals.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old June 19th, 2012, 12:59 PM
thevaliant thevaliant is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Joe Benton Land
Posts: 320
Quote:
Originally Posted by Devolved View Post
Based on past threads I don't think the OP will want to write a timeline in which the Americans enter the war just 3 days before Barbarossa and Germany is defeated by mid 1944.
Agreed .

That reminds me. I really really must read Happy and Glorious. I keep getting distracted by other things (like work).
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old June 19th, 2012, 01:36 PM
corditeman corditeman is offline
Corditeman
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Dalbeattie, Scotland
Posts: 1000 or more
Red face Whoops...!

Sorry, Devolved - Great War fixation....
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old June 19th, 2012, 01:54 PM
HMS Warspite HMS Warspite is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: 2nd star to the right and then straight on.
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by MattII View Post
Hm, come to think about it, U-203 sinking USS Texas isn't that plausible IMO, it's be something a bit more like U-203 shadows the battlegroup containing USS Texas. The battlegroup considers the action hostile, and attacks, quickly sinking U-203, but not quickly enough that it can't get a message off. Hitler hears the message, and incensed, declares war on the US against the advice of his generals.

U-203 could easily avoid the US DD screen, as in early 1941, USN ships were completely illequipped and trained to combat submarines and needed time to learn how to do things from their future British Allies first. Secodnly, DD's are not optimised for ASW, being more multi purpose ships in a sort of warfare asking for specialised ASW vessels, such as the Loch class Frigates.

By the way, Operation Barbarossa was a huge operation, demanding months, or even years of planning, not easily postponed in as few as three days. Even if the Germans wanted it, they simply lacked time to postpone the attack on Russia. Things had already set in motion beyond the point of no return.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old June 19th, 2012, 05:07 PM
Decatur Decatur is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Decatur, Illinois
Posts: 68
German submarine U-203 sinks USS Texas. USA promptly declares war on Germany. Invasion of USSR goes as planned, since it is too far along to delay (and Hitler expects he can knock the Soviets out of the war before the USA can significantly intervene).

Britons are stunned at film footage of Winston Churchill dancing a jig when he learns that both USA and USSR are his new allies.

A few months later, Japan takes advantage of the international situation to launch attacks on US, British, and Dutch colonies in the Far East.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old June 19th, 2012, 05:50 PM
metastasis_d metastasis_d is offline
Full Battle Rattle
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Texas occupied Missouri
Posts: 1000 or more
I don't have much understanding of the alliance between Germany and Japan. Would Japan declare war immediately after a US/German declaration, like Germany did OTL after the US declared in December?
__________________
Basemap
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old June 19th, 2012, 06:47 PM
sloreck sloreck is offline
Grunt Bear
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Midwest
Posts: 899
The Japanese-German Alliance was defensive. In this scenario, since Germany "attacked" the USA Japan is not obligated to declare war. OTL Since the Japanese attacked the USA Germany was not obligated to declare war in December, 1941 - but due to Hitler's (usual) idiocy they did. The "defensive" clause was how the Japanese stayed out of the Germany-USSR business...Soviet ships carrying Lend-Lease from US Pacific ports sailed past Japan on the way to Vladivostok where the goods would be shipped east on the Trans-Siberian RR.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old June 19th, 2012, 06:51 PM
BlairWitch749 BlairWitch749 is offline
resident right wing apologist
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Long Island NY
Posts: 1000 or more
Send a message via MSN to BlairWitch749
this is an interesting question to ponder and worthy ah fodder

there was a similar incident in feb 1941 when a u-boat accidently got inside the screen of the USS Yorktown when she was on a neutrality patrol

there could have been a shooting incident one way or the other that could have wound up with yorktown being torpedoed
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Astrodragon View Post
OK, where is the real BlairWitch and what have you done with him!!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fleetlord View Post
I feel a little dirty supporting BlairWitch
Manstein in Africa: resumed
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old June 19th, 2012, 07:15 PM
Wet Coast Wet Coast is offline
Knight of the Dinner Table
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 284
Quote:
Originally Posted by sloreck View Post
The Japanese-German Alliance was defensive. In this scenario, since Germany "attacked" the USA Japan is not obligated to declare war. OTL Since the Japanese attacked the USA Germany was not obligated to declare war in December, 1941 - but due to Hitler's (usual) idiocy they did. The "defensive" clause was how the Japanese stayed out of the Germany-USSR business...Soviet ships carrying Lend-Lease from US Pacific ports sailed past Japan on the way to Vladivostok where the goods would be shipped east on the Trans-Siberian RR.
Hitlers decalaration of war on the US was not as idiotic as it may appear. Once the US and the UK were allies in a war against Japan the US would no longer be constrained by neutrality rules or the US Congress when escorting ships to the UK.

Germany faced its submarine campaign being bypassed and the UK becoming much stronger. Hitler gambled that he could knock Russia out of the war and then either negotiate or make Europe impregnable before the US became a factor, especially if the US was intially preoccupied with Japan as would seem likely after Pearl Harbor.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old June 19th, 2012, 07:51 PM
MattII MattII is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by HMS Warspite View Post
U-203 could easily avoid the US DD screen, as in early 1941, USN ships were completely illequipped and trained to combat submarines and needed time to learn how to do things from their future British Allies first. Secodnly, DD's are not optimised for ASW, being more multi purpose ships in a sort of warfare asking for specialised ASW vessels, such as the Loch class Frigates.
Okay then, WTF would U-203 fire on the Texas, knowing it would lead to war?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.