Hey Guys,
Let's say that some time after the reestablishment of British control in the Falklands that Britain and Argentina actually made a Treaty about the Falklands, confirming British rule over them.
What would the butterflies of this be? I mean globally it probably won't have any major effects until around the time IOTL when Argentina invaded the Falklands. However would this invasion be butterflied away? If not what would other nations feelings be towards British control over the Falklands? Currently the main argument against British control is that the British are mere 'squatters' on the islands.
However would more/all nations recognize British sovereignty if there was a treaty? Would it simply be Spain not recognizing British control (as a trade-off for Argentina not recognizing British control in Gibraltar).
Let's say that some time after the reestablishment of British control in the Falklands that Britain and Argentina actually made a Treaty about the Falklands, confirming British rule over them.
What would the butterflies of this be? I mean globally it probably won't have any major effects until around the time IOTL when Argentina invaded the Falklands. However would this invasion be butterflied away? If not what would other nations feelings be towards British control over the Falklands? Currently the main argument against British control is that the British are mere 'squatters' on the islands.
However would more/all nations recognize British sovereignty if there was a treaty? Would it simply be Spain not recognizing British control (as a trade-off for Argentina not recognizing British control in Gibraltar).