1840s-50s immigration to Texas

While much is made in history books about German immigration to Texas during the antebellum period, it was surprisingly limited. According to the 1860 census, Texas had an overall population of 604,000, having rapidly grown during the 1850s by almost 400k. However, the number of residents who were foreign born was a little over 40k. Approximately 20k were originally born in one of the German states, while over 12k had been born in Mexico, with the others having been born in other various European countries. While immigration to Texas was somewhat significant when compared to other southern states, it was very small compared to most northern states. Wisconsin, for instance, was being settled and its frontier being civilized during this same period as Texas. However, the 1860 census shows that Wisconsin, out of 775K residents, had over 250k residents who were foreign born, with over 120k being originally from German states. The foreign immigration fueled the growth of towns and cities, especially Milwaukee.

While the lack of slavery and the abundance of cheap good land available to the small farmer made Wisconsin more attractive to the immigrants from Europe, I wonder if there was anything that promoters in Texas could have done to have siphoned off a bigger chunk of the immigrants coming to America? What would have been necessary to attract another 50k to 75k German and other European immigrants to Texas during this antebellum period? And then, if Texas ended up with 2 to 3 times the number of immigrants on the eve of the Civil War, could this much larger immigrant population have kept Texas in the Union? Or could Texas have gone the way of Virginia with its Western and Northern counties seceding from the rest of the state? Would love to hear some opinions.
 
The biggest draw for more Germans would have been an end to slavery, or a TX indep struggle that didn't turn into a race war as it did IOTL.

Recall that many of the Germans coming to TX were refugees from the 1848 revolutions, freethinkers, proto socialists and other radicals. In much of the German Hill Country in TX, they didn't bother to build churches for 30-50 years. They were mostly pro abolition, tried to get along with Mexicans and Indians, and joined the Union Army in huge numbers. After Blacks, they were the most heavily represented ethnicity among Unionists.

So imagine a TX Republic that agrees to end slavery, perhaps as a way to join the British Empire, and then later becomes part of the US as a free state. (Yes, I know there'd be quite bit of conflict over that admission.) Or imagine a TX indep struggle where the Alamo is abandoned and the executions at Goliad never happen either. A less racist TX with less of the ethnic cleansing that happended IOTL gets a higher proportion of Germans early on.

Or imagine a German entrepenuer being the one to propose colonization to the Mexican authorities, rather than Moses and Stephen Austin.
 
The biggest draw for more Germans would have been an end to slavery, or a TX indep struggle that didn't turn into a race war as it did IOTL.

The Texas revolution was no race war! Many Tejanos supported Texas Independence, some of whom became prominent - Juan Seguin and Lorenzo de Zavala especially spring to mind.
 
And the Tejanos were then essentially threatened with being robbed and killed by the white Texans after independence. If I remember correctly (not posting from home and library) Seguin himself had to make a rather hasty exit under pain of some sort of injury/death/mayhem.
 
And the Tejanos were then essentially threatened with being robbed and killed by the white Texans after independence. If I remember correctly (not posting from home and library) Seguin himself had to make a rather hasty exit under pain of some sort of injury/death/mayhem.
Weren't the Tejanos more criollos than mestizo, let alone indio?
 
Yeah, but in the parlance of the day they certainly weren't viewed as white or more importantly, 'real' Texans.
 
Weren't the Tejanos more criollos than mestizo, let alone indio?

Not really. The biggest city, San Antonio, starts out as a series of Indian missions. A few were criollo, but their numbers were smaller. Most were mestizo. And some were Indio by descent (esp Tlaxcallan and Opata), though assimilated culturally by the time of the indep uprising. There are still cultural assns today in San Antonio of the mission Indians.

To Mike: To expand on Files's points, Seguin was far from the only Mexican to have to flee. In Victoria, Gonzalez, even San Antonio after the uprising. Plus the new TX Rep began ethnically cleansing Indian tribes, the Caddo, Cherokee, etc.

The uprising didn't begin that way, but after the Alamo and Goliad, it became a de facto race war. There's a cenotaph in front of the Alamo, a memorial to those who died in the uprising. The Tejanos who died are almost all left off, and several dozen Anglos who weren't there have their names on the monument instead. I agree, it's a damned shame that Tejano roles in the uprising are (excuse the term) whitewashed away.
 
Top