Go Back   Alternate History Discussion Board > Discussion > Alternate History Discussion: After 1900

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 7th, 2006, 06:25 PM
Agentdark Agentdark is offline
Claiming the Falklands
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Logical Federation
Posts: 1000 or more
USA/CSA reunifaction

Okay, presume that the CSA wins independance in one of a 100 different ways, but what would be a possible way for the CSA to be incorporated back into the USA, either by Unifaction, Anexxation, whatever...
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Communist Wizard
Agentdark, either a SW player or an Eldrich Abomination. You decide.

No Rest for the Wicked

NG Death Count-0
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old September 7th, 2006, 06:30 PM
David bar Elias David bar Elias is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Agentdark View Post
Okay, presume that the CSA wins independance in one of a 100 different ways, but what would be a possible way for the CSA to be incorporated back into the USA, either by Unifaction, Anexxation, whatever...
The USA becomes a thriving social democracy.....by the 1980s, the USA is even wealthier than it is today.....far less racism than in Dixie. By the 1990s, the Confederacy begins to break apart. The southern states begin to break away back to the Union.....depends on just how big the CSA is in such a scenario. If the CSA just comprises the 11 states of OTL, then the border states go first. Then the CSA eventually declares war on the USA, and the USA conquers the South, and revives the Union, but has to spend billions rehabilitating the South to match the North........
__________________
So long and thanks for all the fish.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old September 7th, 2006, 06:34 PM
Straha Straha is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Cthaco Bell
Posts: 1000 or more
Send a message via AIM to Straha Send a message via MSN to Straha
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

*is laughing on the floor*

THe two cultures are STILL pretty different and somewhat hostile even after 140 years of northern reeducation plus the second reconstruction/civil rights in 1960 to 1980 which destroyed the old order. An indie dixie would NEVER want to reunite with the US
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old September 7th, 2006, 06:37 PM
Nicole Nicole is offline
Apologies for the inconvenien-
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 1000 or more
I can't see USA/CSA Reconciliation as being possible after 1900... now maybe before then, if the early CSA falls apart soon after it's creation, but after 40 years the generation in power will have known only the CSA for their entire adult lives, and don't feel that connection to the USA. Now, I can see the USA and CSA ending up close allies, for example, but reunification..
__________________
Austriae Est Imperare Orbi Universo
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old September 7th, 2006, 06:40 PM
Straha Straha is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Cthaco Bell
Posts: 1000 or more
Send a message via AIM to Straha Send a message via MSN to Straha
I don't see either the US or CS falling apart. I see the best political analogy for the CS being brazil or another unstable latin american country. Regional troubles yes, juntas yes? implosion into many peices no
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old September 7th, 2006, 06:43 PM
Nicole Nicole is offline
Apologies for the inconvenien-
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Straha View Post
I don't see either the US or CS falling apart. I see the best political analogy for the CS being brazil or another unstable latin american country. Regional troubles yes, juntas yes? implosion into many peices no
Well, the CSA is a state built on secession from a similar union (unlike the USA, built on "secession" from a colonial system to a radically different union), so it might be possible, but I think that secession would be treated as a very last resort- like it was OTL, in fact... the South put up with a lot of percieved injustices before they seceded. (I'm not saying they were injustices, but they were percieved that way and that's what's important)
__________________
Austriae Est Imperare Orbi Universo
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old September 7th, 2006, 06:44 PM
Straha Straha is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Cthaco Bell
Posts: 1000 or more
Send a message via AIM to Straha Send a message via MSN to Straha
IIRC the CS constition forbids secession. As would a psot CS victory US constittion.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old September 7th, 2006, 06:45 PM
Nicole Nicole is offline
Apologies for the inconvenien-
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Straha View Post
IIRC the CS constition forbids secession. As would a psot CS victory US constittion.
The CSA Constitution forbids secession? That's strange...

I agree that a Constitutional Amendment would be rushed through to explicitly ban secession after the ATL's ACW.
__________________
Austriae Est Imperare Orbi Universo
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old September 7th, 2006, 06:46 PM
Straha Straha is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Cthaco Bell
Posts: 1000 or more
Send a message via AIM to Straha Send a message via MSN to Straha
Note: That's what I recall... I may or may not be right./
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old September 7th, 2006, 06:54 PM
Agentdark Agentdark is offline
Claiming the Falklands
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Logical Federation
Posts: 1000 or more
Meh...It was just a thought.....
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Communist Wizard
Agentdark, either a SW player or an Eldrich Abomination. You decide.

No Rest for the Wicked

NG Death Count-0
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old September 7th, 2006, 07:06 PM
The Ubbergeek The Ubbergeek is offline
Insane internet demigod (TN)
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Province of Quebec
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Imajin View Post
The CSA Constitution forbids secession? That's strange...

I agree that a Constitutional Amendment would be rushed through to explicitly ban secession after the ATL's ACW.
The Confederate Constitution = the USA one at time, minus maybe a few items, as far I know.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fred View Post
The Ubbergeek kills Canada
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old September 7th, 2006, 07:11 PM
Nicole Nicole is offline
Apologies for the inconvenien-
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Ubbergeek View Post
The Confederate Constitution = the USA one at time, minus maybe a few items, as far I know.
And the US constitution doesn't explicitly ban secession anywhere...
__________________
Austriae Est Imperare Orbi Universo
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old September 7th, 2006, 07:17 PM
The Ubbergeek The Ubbergeek is offline
Insane internet demigod (TN)
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Province of Quebec
Posts: 1000 or more
Was not there anything about that added later after the ACW, or I am wrong? At least something that is interpreted as it?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fred View Post
The Ubbergeek kills Canada
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old September 7th, 2006, 07:57 PM
MerryPrankster MerryPrankster is online now
www.accordingtoquinn.com
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Ubbergeek View Post
Was not there anything about that added later after the ACW, or I am wrong? At least something that is interpreted as it?
The Supreme Court ruled secession unconstitutional in 1867, after it had already been crushed by the Union Leviathan.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old September 7th, 2006, 07:58 PM
MerryPrankster MerryPrankster is online now
www.accordingtoquinn.com
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Imajin View Post
I can't see USA/CSA Reconciliation as being possible after 1900... now maybe before then, if the early CSA falls apart soon after it's creation, but after 40 years the generation in power will have known only the CSA for their entire adult lives, and don't feel that connection to the USA. Now, I can see the USA and CSA ending up close allies, for example, but reunification..
Makes sense.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old September 7th, 2006, 08:03 PM
HueyLong HueyLong is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Cowering behind bodyguards
Posts: 1000 or more
Straha, where are you getting this stuff? The CSA constitution said nothing more on the matter of secession. Why? Because they felt it was an inherent part of the constitution-as-contract. To disavow it or even add an amendment allowing secession would have removed the legitimacy they had.

The States would have held the right to secede. There was nothing stopping them in CSA law or thought.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old September 7th, 2006, 08:08 PM
Max Sinister Max Sinister is offline
Retired Myriad Club Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The Chaos TL
Posts: 1000 or more
Gurps AE claims that the CSA constitution doesn't allow secession. Could be a mistake (or is only valid in the Dixie TL), though.
__________________
Finished: Chaos TL - Genghis Khan dies in 1200
Timeline, Scenario, Stories!
Hitler's Med Strategy
Jaredia: A tilted Earth (NOW: 4000 BCE)
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old September 7th, 2006, 08:15 PM
HueyLong HueyLong is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Cowering behind bodyguards
Posts: 1000 or more
Just in GURPs. The only major differences were the addition of a line item veto, a six year one-time term for presidents, and more restrictive commerce clause.

The line in their preamble that suggests secession and more independence:


We, the people of the Confederate States, each State acting in its sovereign and independent character..

And here is a site, with a slightly anti-Confederate bias, I'll note, that does look at each change made to the Constitution.

http://www.filibustercartoons.com/CSA.htm
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.