Go Back   Alternate History Discussion Board > Discussion > Alternate History Books and Media

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1341  
Old June 18th, 2012, 05:46 AM
Nerdlinger Nerdlinger is offline
The nerd formerly known as DJC
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Anywhere but here
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Kiat View Post
Egads, he's gonna start WWIII isn't he?
No, just the Third Mexican War.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cambyses The Mad View Post
Jedi to Hitler: "These aren't the Jews you're looking for."
Rebs, Reds, and the Race
Worldwar: Out of Balance
Star Wars: Point of Divergence
Reply With Quote
  #1342  
Old June 19th, 2012, 02:14 PM
MatthewFirth MatthewFirth is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Portsmouth, England
Posts: 330
I'm planning a couple of timeline's based on David's

1 = A musical timeline
2 = The UK and how it stuggled after the war
3 = How football was effected by this

Anyone willing to help with a collabarative effort?
Reply With Quote
  #1343  
Old June 19th, 2012, 02:25 PM
GeorgeUK GeorgeUK is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 277
England win the 1954, 1974 and 1990 World Cups, with the 1974 one on home soil. They also lose the final in 1966 (against host nation Germany), 1982 (against Italy), 1986 (against Germany again) and 2002 (against Brazil). They also become known for being virtually unbeatable in penalty shootouts.
Reply With Quote
  #1344  
Old June 19th, 2012, 02:37 PM
MatthewFirth MatthewFirth is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Portsmouth, England
Posts: 330
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeorgeUK View Post
England win the 1954, 1974 and 1990 World Cups, with the 1974 one on home soil. They also lose the final in 1966 (against host nation Germany), 1982 (against Italy), 1986 (against Germany again) and 2002 (against Brazil). They also become known for being virtually unbeatable in penalty shootouts.
Good start.

You would be great to help out with the football one.
Reply With Quote
  #1345  
Old June 20th, 2012, 06:54 AM
Richter von Manthofen Richter von Manthofen is offline
Gnome Fighter Ace
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Österreich
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeorgeUK View Post
England win the 1954, 1974 and 1990 World Cups, with the 1974 one on home soil. They also lose the final in 1966 (against host nation Germany), 1982 (against Italy), 1986 (against Germany again) and 2002 (against Brazil). They also become known for being virtually unbeatable in penalty shootouts.
Thats totaly ASB
__________________
Its a smart move to begin the day with a new mistake - only fools do the same again!
Reply With Quote
  #1346  
Old June 20th, 2012, 08:44 AM
Arkhangelsk Arkhangelsk is offline
Death to Ameriwanks!
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Dairy cow Paradise
Posts: 643
Send a message via Yahoo to Arkhangelsk
The 1980 world map has been fixed as per David's corrections, thank you.

Here's the Alliances as of 1980.
Attached Images
 
__________________
Bolívar dead? War of 1812 averted? President Henry Clay? Check out my TL:
ˇPor la Patria, Viva México Fuerte!: UPDATED 1/3/13
Reply With Quote
  #1347  
Old June 20th, 2012, 02:14 PM
Nerdlinger Nerdlinger is offline
The nerd formerly known as DJC
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Anywhere but here
Posts: 1000 or more
I like your 1980 world map a lot, Arkhangelsk. I had a few questions regarding the ownership of some islands (forgive me if I'm nitpicking too much).

1) Palau seems to be owned by Germany on the map, but as near as I can tell, it should be American. In OTL, the Spanish sold Palau to the Germans in 1899 following their defeat in the Spanish-American War. However, since this war was butterflied away in TL-191, Palau should have been in Spanish hands until the Hispano-Japanese War of the first decades of the 1900s. At that point, the Japanese would have seized control. Though Palau was not mentioned in the Treaty of Sapporo, I assume it was turned over to the US along with the other Japanese island possessions after the Fourth Pacific War. There is the chance that the Germans could have taken Palau from the Japanese at some point before the Fourth Pacific War, but there does not seem to be any indication whatsoever of Palau's fate either in the TL-191 books or in After the End.

2) Easter Island is shown as being under American control. I would think that it would be Chilean. Based on Turtledove's general ignoring of butterflies in matters not concerning the USA or CSA, Easter Island should have been picked up by Chile in 1888 as in OTL. Given that Chile was an American ally, it seems unlikely that the US would have taken the island away. The only reason I can think of for Easter Island to be American in 1980 is if the British (or French) took control of it in one of the Great Wars and the US subsequently took it back. If this were the case, however, I don't see any reason why the US wouldn't give it back to Chile.

3) St. Helena, Ascension, and Tristan da Cunha seem to be under British control, but since the British seem to have lost every other overseas possession, it's likely that they are no longer British (probably American, if I had to guess).

4) The Virgin Islands only appear as two tiny islands on the map, the southern of which is probably St. Croix of the OTL US Virgin Islands. I'm guessing the northern island is Tortola of the OTL British Virgin Islands -- while it could be St. Thomas or St. John of the OTL US Virgin Islands, it'd make sense for that island to be Tortola so that both the US and British VI could be represented on the map. Both islands are indicated as being owned by Denmark. While it makes sense that the OTL US VI would still be Danish (the US purchase of the islands in 1917 in OTL would likely have been butterflied away due to the reduced presence of the US in the Caribbean in TL-191), I would think that the British VI would have been seized by the US after one of the Great Wars along with the rest of the Entente Caribbean islands.

5) The Caribbean island shown as being split between the US and the Netherlands is not likely St. Martin, but rather St. Kitts. As such, it should be all American. Starting east of the Virgin Islands and moving from north to south along the Lesser Antilles island chain, I'd would guess that the islands shown are:

Barbuda (to represent Antigua and Barbuda, though the former is missing)
St. Kitts (to represent St. Kitts and Nevis)
Montserrat
Guadeloupe
Dominica
Martinique
St. Lucia
St. Vincent
one of the Grenadines
Grenada

The easternmost island is Barbados, and the two south of Grenada are Tobago and Trinidad.

In this way, every independent nation in the Caribbean in OTL is represented (as are two dependencies of France and one of the UK). St. Martin is therefore not represented on the map, though this was not too problematic in OTL until recently, when the Netherlands Antilles (already represented further south on the map along the coast of Venezuela) broke up and French St. Martin split off from Guadeloupe.


Anyone can let me know if I'm off-base on anything here.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cambyses The Mad View Post
Jedi to Hitler: "These aren't the Jews you're looking for."
Rebs, Reds, and the Race
Worldwar: Out of Balance
Star Wars: Point of Divergence
Reply With Quote
  #1348  
Old June 20th, 2012, 04:54 PM
MatthewFirth MatthewFirth is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Portsmouth, England
Posts: 330
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richter von Manthofen View Post
Thats totaly ASB
Good.

What about European Championship's though?
Reply With Quote
  #1349  
Old June 20th, 2012, 07:51 PM
CT23 CT23 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1000 or more
A question about Colombia: in one of the American Empire books, it was mentioned Colombia was an American ally, so shouldn't they be in the blue alliance?
Reply With Quote
  #1350  
Old June 20th, 2012, 07:56 PM
Petike Petike is offline
Sky Pirate Extraordinaire
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: The Gothic Clockpunk Kingdom of Zemplín's crown colony of Franz Joseph's Land
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richter von Manthofen View Post
Thats totaly ASB
*sighs*

Because TL 191 is totally plausible...
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thande View Post
History is written by the victors, unless they're illiterate
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coyote Knight on Tom Bombadil's true nature View Post
Either Gandalf's younger brother, or Gandalf's Tyler Durden.
Reply With Quote
  #1351  
Old June 20th, 2012, 09:20 PM
Arkhangelsk Arkhangelsk is offline
Death to Ameriwanks!
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Dairy cow Paradise
Posts: 643
Send a message via Yahoo to Arkhangelsk
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nerdlinger View Post
I like your 1980 world map a lot, Arkhangelsk. I had a few questions regarding the ownership of some islands (forgive me if I'm nitpicking too much).

1) Palau seems to be owned by Germany on the map, but as near as I can tell, it should be American. In OTL, the Spanish sold Palau to the Germans in 1899 following their defeat in the Spanish-American War. However, since this war was butterflied away in TL-191, Palau should have been in Spanish hands until the Hispano-Japanese War of the first decades of the 1900s. At that point, the Japanese would have seized control. Though Palau was not mentioned in the Treaty of Sapporo, I assume it was turned over to the US along with the other Japanese island possessions after the Fourth Pacific War. There is the chance that the Germans could have taken Palau from the Japanese at some point before the Fourth Pacific War, but there does not seem to be any indication whatsoever of Palau's fate either in the TL-191 books or in After the End.

2) Easter Island is shown as being under American control. I would think that it would be Chilean. Based on Turtledove's general ignoring of butterflies in matters not concerning the USA or CSA, Easter Island should have been picked up by Chile in 1888 as in OTL. Given that Chile was an American ally, it seems unlikely that the US would have taken the island away. The only reason I can think of for Easter Island to be American in 1980 is if the British (or French) took control of it in one of the Great Wars and the US subsequently took it back. If this were the case, however, I don't see any reason why the US wouldn't give it back to Chile.

3) St. Helena, Ascension, and Tristan da Cunha seem to be under British control, but since the British seem to have lost every other overseas possession, it's likely that they are no longer British (probably American, if I had to guess).

4) The Virgin Islands only appear as two tiny islands on the map, the southern of which is probably St. Croix of the OTL US Virgin Islands. I'm guessing the northern island is Tortola of the OTL British Virgin Islands -- while it could be St. Thomas or St. John of the OTL US Virgin Islands, it'd make sense for that island to be Tortola so that both the US and British VI could be represented on the map. Both islands are indicated as being owned by Denmark. While it makes sense that the OTL US VI would still be Danish (the US purchase of the islands in 1917 in OTL would likely have been butterflied away due to the reduced presence of the US in the Caribbean in TL-191), I would think that the British VI would have been seized by the US after one of the Great Wars along with the rest of the Entente Caribbean islands.

5) The Caribbean island shown as being split between the US and the Netherlands is not likely St. Martin, but rather St. Kitts. As such, it should be all American. Starting east of the Virgin Islands and moving from north to south along the Lesser Antilles island chain, I'd would guess that the islands shown are:

Barbuda (to represent Antigua and Barbuda, though the former is missing)
St. Kitts (to represent St. Kitts and Nevis)
Montserrat
Guadeloupe
Dominica
Martinique
St. Lucia
St. Vincent
one of the Grenadines
Grenada

The easternmost island is Barbados, and the two south of Grenada are Tobago and Trinidad.

In this way, every independent nation in the Caribbean in OTL is represented (as are two dependencies of France and one of the UK). St. Martin is therefore not represented on the map, though this was not too problematic in OTL until recently, when the Netherlands Antilles (already represented further south on the map along the coast of Venezuela) broke up and French St. Martin split off from Guadeloupe.


Anyone can let me know if I'm off-base on anything here.
Oh no the nitpicking is fine, I'm glad to see the map being analyzed so, it's the only way I can improve them, so thank you!

All your points seem valid to me, I think it was just a matter of me overlooking these tiny little islands, and from the sound of it you sound correct in your assessment. I'm gonna go ahead and fix them as per your corrections. DBE, what do you think?

Anyway, thank you Nerdlinger.
__________________
Bolívar dead? War of 1812 averted? President Henry Clay? Check out my TL:
ˇPor la Patria, Viva México Fuerte!: UPDATED 1/3/13
Reply With Quote
  #1352  
Old June 20th, 2012, 09:20 PM
jycee jycee is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by CT23 View Post
A question about Colombia: in one of the American Empire books, it was mentioned Colombia was an American ally, so shouldn't they be in the blue alliance?
I was wondering the same, and was actually thinking that it should be possible for some countries to be members of more than one alliance. Colombia, for example, meets both the requirements to join the CDS and the IM.

Unless being a member of the CDS is seen by most as becoming an American puppet willingly. However, now that Russia and China are in they are probably almost on equal footing with the US as senior partners.
__________________
Poor Little Mexico, So Far From God, So Close to The United States. Or maybe not so. Follow: A Mexican "Victory" 2.0 to witness an alternate.
Reply With Quote
  #1353  
Old June 21st, 2012, 06:49 PM
Archangel Archangel is offline
Battery-powered Bureaucrat
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Portugal
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arkhangelsk View Post
The 1980 world map has been fixed as per David's corrections, thank you.

Here's the Alliances as of 1980.
Good map, Arkhangelsk!
__________________
My stories
_________________________________________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thande View Post
(I assume all my readers are from OTL...)
Reply With Quote
  #1354  
Old June 22nd, 2012, 02:39 AM
Mac Gregor Mac Gregor is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1000 or more
Central Asia

Let me first say I love this TL and can't wait for it to come back.

Something that could use a little work though would be the central Asian states. Correct me if I am wrong but I believe that the boundaries of the 5 “stans” are largely a result of Soviet era population shifts. With no USSR in the TL, shouldn’t they be considerable different?
__________________
Watch the TL on Youtube
Reply With Quote
  #1355  
Old June 22nd, 2012, 02:56 AM
CT23 CT23 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1000 or more
Did Germany complete the takeover of Alsace-Lorraine?
Reply With Quote
  #1356  
Old June 22nd, 2012, 03:13 AM
Saladan Saladan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 946
will texas ever rejoin the US?

seems like it would be nice for old union to be truly reunited
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by catboy637 View Post
I'm not ignorant, I'm patrioitc!
Reply With Quote
  #1357  
Old June 22nd, 2012, 03:13 AM
Zmflavius Zmflavius is online now
Ich will Knödel!
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Happy Fun Sunshine Land
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by CT23 View Post
Did Germany complete the takeover of Alsace-Lorraine?
I would assume so, given that it never lost it (well, except temporarily in the Settling Accounts series)
__________________


Quote:
Originally Posted by JamesSmith View Post
I am a natural man, not a sockpuppet.
Reply With Quote
  #1358  
Old June 22nd, 2012, 07:30 AM
Vexacus Vexacus is offline
Evil Space Ninja
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Abyss Of Evil
Posts: 1000 or more
After looking at the map, I take it the Republic of Ezo does not have a territorial dispute with Russia over the Northern Territories?
__________________
Check Out My ASB timeline:
http://www.alternatehistory.com/disc...=1#post7434980
Reply With Quote
  #1359  
Old June 22nd, 2012, 12:19 PM
Zmflavius Zmflavius is online now
Ich will Knödel!
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Happy Fun Sunshine Land
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vexacus View Post
After looking at the map, I take it the Republic of Ezo does not have a territorial dispute with Russia over the Northern Territories?
It's not like they're in any position to complain?
__________________


Quote:
Originally Posted by JamesSmith View Post
I am a natural man, not a sockpuppet.
Reply With Quote
  #1360  
Old June 24th, 2012, 07:10 AM
jycee jycee is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mac Gregor View Post
Something that could use a little work though would be the central Asian states. Correct me if I am wrong but I believe that the boundaries of the 5 “stans” are largely a result of Soviet era population shifts. With no USSR in the TL, shouldn’t they be considerable different? [/FONT]
Kazakhstan's border with Russia is different, but aside from that the rest are the same. Guess it goes with the whole ignoring certain butterflies theme of TL 191.
__________________
Poor Little Mexico, So Far From God, So Close to The United States. Or maybe not so. Follow: A Mexican "Victory" 2.0 to witness an alternate.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.