As you might know (and if you don't check a map), the city of Aachen lies very closely to the Netherlands. Besides that Aachen had been an important city in German history. Recently I was wondering how important Aachen was for German nationalists. So what if Aachen had become Dutch? And I don't mean in the 20th century after the first or second world war, but earlier late 18th or early 19th century.
If you look at this map, the coloured parts were part of the duchy of Limburg or the "landen van Overmaas", which were divided by the Dutch republic and the southern Netherlands.
In this map you can see which was Dutch and which belonged to the southern Netherlands.
http://www.hoeckmann.de/imagesdeutsch/limburg.gif
In both you see how Aachen is almost surrounded by "Dutch" territory.
So lets assume (for example) that the Netherlands does slightly better during the negotiations of a peace treaty (like the treaty of Utrecht) and manages to gain Ubach-Palenberg, Herzogenrath, Kerkrade and Alsdorf. rnech revolution and Napoleon happens and the Netherlands regains these areas after the wars and gains Eupen and Walhorn (part of Limburg) and to create a reasonable border also gains Aachen.
Or maybe the Dutch simply gain Aachen after the Napoleonic wars in Vienna (It was included in the claims Willem I made, but never got), because the borders around Limburg were drawn slightly differently. Prussia got compensated somewhere else, assuming it is even necessary.
Anyway the Netherlands got Aachen and it remains Dutch after the Belgian revolution (assuming it isn't butterflied away).
So the German nationalism happens. How would they react to Aachen being Dutch? Simply leave the Netherlands alone, like they did OTL and ignore it (and not even care about it). Would they actualy attack the Netherlands to gain it? Or would they stil claim it, but leave it as it is, as the relationship with the Netherlands is more important than 1 small city.
If you look at this map, the coloured parts were part of the duchy of Limburg or the "landen van Overmaas", which were divided by the Dutch republic and the southern Netherlands.
In this map you can see which was Dutch and which belonged to the southern Netherlands.
http://www.hoeckmann.de/imagesdeutsch/limburg.gif
In both you see how Aachen is almost surrounded by "Dutch" territory.
So lets assume (for example) that the Netherlands does slightly better during the negotiations of a peace treaty (like the treaty of Utrecht) and manages to gain Ubach-Palenberg, Herzogenrath, Kerkrade and Alsdorf. rnech revolution and Napoleon happens and the Netherlands regains these areas after the wars and gains Eupen and Walhorn (part of Limburg) and to create a reasonable border also gains Aachen.
Or maybe the Dutch simply gain Aachen after the Napoleonic wars in Vienna (It was included in the claims Willem I made, but never got), because the borders around Limburg were drawn slightly differently. Prussia got compensated somewhere else, assuming it is even necessary.
Anyway the Netherlands got Aachen and it remains Dutch after the Belgian revolution (assuming it isn't butterflied away).
So the German nationalism happens. How would they react to Aachen being Dutch? Simply leave the Netherlands alone, like they did OTL and ignore it (and not even care about it). Would they actualy attack the Netherlands to gain it? Or would they stil claim it, but leave it as it is, as the relationship with the Netherlands is more important than 1 small city.