Maria Manuela I of Portugal - A sovereign state free from the Iberian Union

Maria Manuela I of Portugal
A sovereign state free from the Iberian Union

QkF0aM2.jpg
Majestic, isn't she?

As we know, Maria Manuela Avis-Habsburg was the eldest surviving daughter of John III of Portugal and his wife (and first cousin) Catherine of Austria, the youngest daughter to Philip "the Handsome" and Joan of Castile, "the Mad".

Maria Manuela was a quiet and melancholy girl that in her mid teens was sent to Spain in order to marry her double-first-cousin, the soon-to-be Philip II of Spain. Their only son, Don Carlos Lourenço of Asturias, is regarded as one of the most controversial royals of late Renaissance. Born deformed, ugly and mentally incapable, with a fond for torturing animals and humiliating servants, he died aged 23 after being held prisoner by his own father for some time.

Maria Manuela herself died only a few days after giving birth. Her younger sibling, João Manuel, would marry Joan of Spain, who was Maria Manuela's sister-in-law. Their offspring would result in another woe: Sebastian I of Portugal, the infamous prince that died after a suicidal battle against the moors in 1578 (Battle of Alcácer-Quibir). He was much more handsome and athletic than his 10 years older double-first-cousin Carlos, but he enjoyed a health as pitiful as the latter's and was strongly misogynistic, refusing to marry and producing issue.

This eventually led to the 1580 Portuguese Succession Crisis, that made his uncle, Philip II of Spain, also king of Portugal, throwing the country in a 60 year long period of subservience to its Castilian neighbour and dragging the Portuguese Colonial Empire down to a slow but painful decadence.

However, as some people here may know, John III of Portugal had a younger sibling: Duarte (or Edward), the Duke of Guimarães. Duarte had two daughters, Maria (married to the Duke of Parma) and Catherine (married to the duke of Bragança). Eventually, IOTL, Catherine of Guimarães's grandson would be John IV Bragança of Portugal. But Duarte had another son, born posthumously: Duarte II of Guimarães (1541-1576). Contemporary record describes Duarte II as a handsome, cultivated, politically skillful and popular prince. He also seemed to be chaste, since there are no records of mistresses or children born out-of-wedlock. Actually this guy never even married.
This popularity caused very much jealousy on Sebastian, who in turn mistreated his first-cousin-once-removed in every possible way. It is said that Sebastian purposedly didn't invite his cousin to a royal bull-fight in Xabregas, which had upset Duarte to the point of making him withdraw from court.

So, basically:

There would be three crucial POD's here: the first would be Maria Manuela surviving longer enough to maybe producing more heirs or even assuming the throne after her father's death. The second would be her brother João Manuel dying as a child, before marrying, so there would never be a Sebastian. The third would be Duarte II of Guimarães living longer that he lived and marrying.

Maria Manuela was, IOTL, sworn heiress to the throne of Portugal in the absence of surviving brothers (the Iberian kingdoms were much more female-friendly in terms of inheritance). Let's butterfly that John III of Portugal (who was still alive at the time of his grandchildren's births) stipulated in the marriage contract of his daughter that the crowns of Portugal and Castile-Aragon should never reunite, and Maria Manuela should nominate one of her children to the throne of Portugal, renouncing to their rights to the Spanish throne. Let's suppose that she gives birth to another daughter: let's name her Catherine Isabella of Spain, born around 1546. This would surely mess a little bit with the succession again, but there's a very bright light in the end of the tunnel.

With John III dying in 1557 just as he died IOTL, supposing that Maria Manuela lives longer, she would be declared Maria I of Portugal or Maria Manuela I of Portugal. Unhappily in those times, the stupidest excuses were given in order to alienate women from ruling, and this certainly would be the case, since the girl seemed to be a little too delicate and moody to rule (Maria's grandmother was Joan the Mad, don't forget it), and probably her husband Philip would be the "de facto" sovereign of Portugal during the minority of their children.

If the aforementioned Catherine of Spain marries her first-cousin-once-removed Duarte II of Guimarães, who was only 5 years her senior and in all grounds a perfect match, Catherine would be after her mother's death Catherine I of Portugal, being the rightful granddaughter of the previous male king. Her husband and cousin Duarte, by "jure uxoris" and being also a male-line grandson of Manuel I Avis, Duarte II of Portugal. So, after all, if the young couple manages to produce a large and healthy offspring, the Dinasty of Avis would be kept alive and Iberian Union would never take place. Carlos Lourenço, Catherine's elder brother, could also be a little less messed up and could've married Elisabeth of Valois instead of his father, thus stopping for a while the tradition of incestous marriages (and inbreeding) in the Habsburg tree. Their issue would certainly be much healthier and also could even prevent the Habsburg collapse of Charles II of Spain, a century later.

Finally, which would be the short-term and long-term consequences of this solution to the succession crisis? Would Portugal resume being the great and glorious colonial/comercial empire it was before IOTL's Iberian Union? Would the Inquisition in Portuguese domains stop for the sake of peace and respect to natives and jews/moors? Would Maria Manuela and her daughter Catherine manage to be powerful rulers and be sort of Iberian-Catholic versions of Elizabeth I of England in terms of "ass-kicking women in power"?

Any suggestions to stretch it further and better? They will all be appreciated!

Thanks in advance!
 
Last edited:
Interested but I know almost nothing of Portugese history.

Would an independent Portugal be an ally or rival to England, or is England too removed from Portugese concerns?
 

Lusitania

Donor
If she does not die after the birth of her fist child and had one or more children. We in Portugal could only hope that they would not suffer from the affliction that her first born suffered from.

Now if the second child (girl) becomes heir to Portuguese throne. There are a few questions.
1) Does Maria Manuela have any other children who survive
2) Does King Phillip II lock up his heir to the throne for being a sadistic, deformed child.
3) King Phillip II re-married after Maria died, so what would happen,
4) If Prince Carlos dies, and no other siblings does the queen of Portugal inherit Spain throne.
 
If she does not die after the birth of her fist child and had one or more children. We in Portugal could only hope that they would not suffer from the affliction that her first born suffered from.

Now if the second child (girl) becomes heir to Portuguese throne. There are a few questions.
1) Does Maria Manuela have any other children who survive
2) Does King Phillip II lock up his heir to the throne for being a sadistic, deformed child.
3) King Phillip II re-married after Maria died, so what would happen,
4) If Prince Carlos dies, and no other siblings does the queen of Portugal inherit Spain throne.

I particularly plan Catherine Isabella of Spain to be a very healthy, lively, intelligent and even witty girl, much to the delight of her teenage father Philip. About Charles/Carlos, I can figure him ITTL as the opposite of his OTL counterpart in terms of personality and behaviour, being an affable and introspective boy with one or another health problem, but not enough to make him a real-life Quasimodo.

On the questions:

a) Yes, besides Charles and Catherine it would be interesting if, for instance, they had other children. And not to steal Catherine's place on succession, only girls.
b) No, Philip's relationship with Charles would be some sort of cold and distant as OTL I guess, but with Charles being a normal and well-meaning boy, such drastic measures wouldn't have to be taken.
c) If Maria Manuela dies around 1550, I can figure Philip marrying again, this time to Margaret of Valois, Duchess of Berry. IOTL there were, indeed, plans for a marriage. They were however dismantled and then there was given preference to Maria Manuela.
d) If Charles dies before having any children, then Catherine Isabella would be for some time the heir to the throne. But as said, her father could remarry, and any possible sons could pass her behind in the spanish succession line, thus ensuring the independence of the Portuguese crown.
 
From the 1560s on Irish Catholic rebels might look to an independent Lisbon (as against Spain) for aid - though obviously this a non starter if Portugal and England are allied!
 
This is the second tl I've read in the last few days featuring Duarte of Guimarães and it makes me quite happy.

Maria Manuela (and/or her descendants) inheriting Portugal is an interesting possibility with Duarte available as a pretty perfect king consort for Catherine Isabella.

A healthier/saner Carlos is possible and can be fun (Now Blooms the Tudor Rose features an awesome incarnation), but honestly when it comes to this gene pool we can’t expect too much. Fortunately for Catherine Isabella, healthy/sane daughters are a little more likely. I think inbreeding affects daughters less than sons (two x-chromosomes moderating each other or something) which is certainly how it worked out for Habsburgs.

However if Philip and Maria Manuela have a surviving son, I can't see Philip II being content with letting their daughter inherit Portugal instead of even further increasing the Habsburg empire. He was pretty intense about this sort of thing. The splitting of his father's empire basically turned into a months long family brawl where he had to give up much of the HRE. I can see him wanting to unify his realms and pass everything on in one piece. It's true that he did cede the Spanish Netherlands to Isabella Clara Eugenia (his favorite child) and her husband-cousin Archduke Alfred, but the conditions there were very stringent. For example, if a female descendant of their ever succeeded, she would be bound to marry the king of Spain and failing that, someone he chose. Oh and also, Philip was pretty invested in the idea of a united Iberia, as a sort of Manifest Destiny thing.
Anyway that would be a stumbling block, but not insurmountable. Even Philip can't always get what he wants. Especially when it's not even his blood claim.

The Spanish-style inquisition had been introduced into Portugal during the Iberian Union. Relatively soon after declaring independence, John IV weakened the power of the Inquisition which was pretty popular among his subjects. The Portuguese were definitely Catholic, not as fanatic as the Spanish, but enough to make enemies overseas with their zeal for conversion.

Without the power void in Lisbon, their empire would be in a more secure position, but they still faced similar vulnerabilities. They'd had a huge head start in establishing markets/colonies, but local rulers would be happy to see the Portuguese have competition. The Dutch or a similar power (England?) with their chill approach to religion and more businesslike (aka less murderous) to trade would definitely be a threat. Also Portugal has too limited a population to be too ambitious.

Portugal and England have historically been friendly and I don't think they would step on each others toes much. England is probably going to follow OTL and focus on North America to begin with.

Okay I'm going to stop now.
 
Okay I'm going to stop now.

No, no, no, please don't stop! Your views on this subject are awesome and based! Feel free to help in this timeline with any opinions and thoughts that please you.

In other timelines I've read in this forum, there were suggestions of a Portuguese colonization of modern-day Canada. If Manuela (or Catherine I) manages to be an ally to Elizabeth I, imagine how interesting would be if the two powers unite in a single force against Spanish powers?

I imagine something really ambiguous coming from them... Like Manuela, while being Catholic, would have fine and amiable relations to protestant nations like the Netherlands, Denmark-Norway, Sweden and the already mentioned England... Just as Henry IV Bourbon of France said, "Paris is well worth a Mass". Maybe Manuela/Catherine's moto becomes "The Atlantic/Indies/Americas are well worth feigned religious convertions" hahahaha :rolleyes:
 
Ranuccio I Farnese, Duke of Parma

what about Ranuccio I Farnese, Duke of Parma, who was rightful heir of the throne when succession crisis arose. what if his claim was made strongly and succeeded. then no iberian union but union of portugal with parma could strengthen the portuguese empire. since he was ally and subject of habsburgs, they would prefer him over catherine.
 
what about Ranuccio I Farnese, Duke of Parma, who was rightful heir of the throne when succession crisis arose. what if his claim was made strongly and succeeded. then no iberian union but union of portugal with parma could strengthen the portuguese empire. since he was ally and subject of habsburgs, they would prefer him over catherine.

Well, IOTL indeed Ranuccio had the strongest claim due to the Inheritance laws of Portugal, however his father was a half-nephew and subject to Spanish King Philip II, and I guess it wouldn't be a clever idea if Alexander Farnese pushed the inheritance of Portugal to his son, disobeying his beloved (and feared) uncle to whom he was dog-loyal.

For such a situation of having Parma united with Portugal, according to the intended ideas ITTL in which Ranuccio's uncle Edward/Duarte becomes king consort, probably Ranuccio could be married off to a Portuguese cousin instead of OTL Margherita Aldobrandini (maybe a hypothetical daughter to Catherine I of Portugal and Edward), then marrying a surviving son of such union into the Portuguese house again (probably a first born daughter to however is the heir to Catherine and Edward).

However, Spain would never allow such proximity between Parma and Portugal, and it seems unlikely to happen even in this fabricated timeline. Supposing if such thing happened, the successive intermarriages between Parmese and Portuguese royal houses could bring a "Charles II of Spain" situation, with a deformed, mentally disabled child leading to fights over the inheritance of the duchy.
 
Top