Does the glorious revolution still happen? People are still peeved about James' religion, but his properly Protestant elder daughters haven't been superseded. Will people just quietly chafe and wait for James to die so Mary (and William?- would he have been co-king if Mary inherited the throne) to ascend the throne?
Now a scatter-gun of mildly relevant questions
If James II isn't deposed at the birth of his daughter (name? Elizabeth like her aunt? Is Henrietta too French?), but has a son a few years later will we see something like the Glorious Revolution, or will James be better established/more willing to fight?
If James is forced out of the country in 1688, Jacobitism would be dead in the water with only a female heir, right?
In an England ruled over by her sisters, what are *Elizabeth's prospects? Presumably a loyal and staunchly Protestant tutor, but marriages and stuff?
Now a scatter-gun of mildly relevant questions
If James II isn't deposed at the birth of his daughter (name? Elizabeth like her aunt? Is Henrietta too French?), but has a son a few years later will we see something like the Glorious Revolution, or will James be better established/more willing to fight?
If James is forced out of the country in 1688, Jacobitism would be dead in the water with only a female heir, right?
In an England ruled over by her sisters, what are *Elizabeth's prospects? Presumably a loyal and staunchly Protestant tutor, but marriages and stuff?